This note checks the concepts of Note 365(2) and shows that the inverse square law in the presence of a fluid vacuum produces the general precessing ellipse (3). It would be very interesting to graph this as a function of partial R / partial r, which is by definition not a function of theta. It can also be compared with the results of UFT328, in which it was shown that the general precessing ellipse emerges from the simultaneous solution of the ECE2 lagrangian and hamiltonian. The Einstien theory does not produce the correct precessing ellipse, in fact it gives a wild result in general (previous UFT papers).