WebLog Feedback for Sunday 29/12/13

There were 1995 hits from 382 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN, yandex and sistrix. Computer Science University of Illinois general; Graduate Students Hebrew University of Jerusalem UFT146; Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences UFT140. Intense interest all sectors.

LENR: Some Comments on the E Cat Reactor

OK , I will finish off UFT255 and then write the chapter, followed by the LENR paper.

In a message dated 30/12/2013 10:16:53 GMT Standard Time writes:

This sounds good. I am sure there is more than enough in the two papers plus notes to form a solid chapter for the em monograph also. The discussion on B(3) will fit very nicely also.

The LENR discussion is very timely.
Doug

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:50 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

The reactor explodes if too much initial energy is used. I note that in the article just sent over by Steve Bannister the reactor is stable at 1,100 C, see a later posting on this blog. A temperature rise of 1,000 C was observed in 10 seconds. When an explosion occurs steel is vapourized, i.e. sublimated and recondensed, indicating tremendous latent power as one might expect from a nuclear reaction. This reminds me of the first conversation I had with Horst Eckardt back in about 2007 at Craig y Nos Castle on a variable frequency Faraday disk generator which exploded under certain conditions. That led to hugely popular papers such as UFT63 and UFT107 based on spin connection resonance. The U. S. Navy seems satisfied with the explanation I have given of the giant resonance observed by Alex Hill, again in terms of spin connection resonance. There should be a certain Nobel Prize for people such as Rossi and the Alex Hill group. Otherwise the Nobel Prize means nothing, politicized and devalued by self seekers. Hopefully the Royal Swedish Academy will right itself and recognize true merit. So in future work on LENR I wil work spin connection resonance in to the fermion equation. The last paper UFT254 and the notes for UFT255 discuss simplified vector formats of the Cartan identity that can be used to study spin connection resonance.

LENR: Some Comments on the E Cat Reactor

The reactor explodes if too much initial energy is used. I note that in the article just sent over by Steve Bannister the reactor is stable at 1,100 C, see a later posting on this blog. A temperature rise of 1,000 C was observed in 10 seconds. When an explosion occurs steel is vapourized, i.e. sublimated and recondensed, indicating tremendous latent power as one might expect from a nuclear reaction. This reminds me of the first conversation I had with Horst Eckardt back in about 2007 at Craig y Nos Castle on a variable frequency Faraday disk generator which exploded under certain conditions. That led to hugely popular papers such as UFT63 and UFT107 based on spin connection resonance. The U. S. Navy seems satisfied with the explanation I have given of the giant resonance observed by Alex Hill, again in terms of spin connection resonance. There should be a certain Nobel Prize for people such as Rossi and the Alex Hill group. Otherwise the Nobel Prize means nothing, politicized and devalued by self seekers. Hopefully the Royal Swedish Academy will right itself and recognize true merit. So in future work on LENR I wil work spin connection resonance in to the fermion equation. The last paper UFT254 and the notes for UFT255 discuss simplified vector formats of the Cartan identity that can be used to study spin connection resonance.

Checking Note 255(2)

Thanks as usual for going through this note. The questions are answered as follows.

1) The complex circular basis was used:

e(1) x e(2) = ie(3)*
et cyclicum

so
e(3)* = e(3) = k = -i e(1) x e(2)

and – i appears. In eq. (1) the notation indicates any basis (Cartesian, cylindrical polar, and so on).

2) Yes A(3) is assumed to be:

A(3) = A(3)* = – i A(1) x A(2) / A(0) = A(0) k = constant

3) Yes agreed.

So the B(3) field comes out of ECE theory and this could be written up in the new textbook. Doug asked me to prepare a section on the B(3) field.

In a message dated 29/12/2013 19:14:05 GMT Standard Time, writes:

I have some points I do not understand in the note, probably due to unsufficient knowledge of B(3) theroy:

1. How did you derive the expressions in the parenthesis in eq.(12)? According to (1), these are the factors omega x A, but without an imaginary unit i, and all with equal sign. From the terms in parenthesis the conjugate complex has to be taken. This is different from multiplying by i.

2. Why is
nabla x A(3)* = 0
in eq. (13)? is A(3) assumed constant?

3. in (14) it has obviously been assumed
A(1) = A(0) e(1),
A(2) = A(0) e(2).

Horst

Am 25.12.2013 12:14, schrieb EMyrone

This note can be used to introduce the B(3) field in the new monograph with Doug and Horst. It shows that the B(3) field concept is rigorously self consistent, and also rigorously consistent inter alia with ECE theory. The unit vectors of the plane wave frame of reference are, self consistently, spin connections. The theory is shown to be rigorously consistent with the Cartan identity in vector format of UFT254. The frame of reference is a cyclic relation between vector spin connections, so electromagnetism is a theory of general relativity, part of the ECE unified field theory. Gravitation can be described in exactly the same way.

More on Rossi’s LENR reactor and Happy New Year.

Many thanks indeed to Steve Bannister for this new information. This looks exceedingly important and it may be a good new year resolution to try to understand this in terms of spin connection resonance. So after the present paper (UFT255) is finished I will start thinking in that direction. I am looking forward to the time when a domestic device of this type is in the shops. I wish that my ancestor, the industrialist Morgan Morgan, could have seen this, I am quite sure that he would have detested wind turbines. To date they have kept them out of the Brecon Beacons National Park. My ancestral cousin Lord Tudor Watkins (Labour M. P. for Brecon and Radnor for many years) would also have vehemently detested wind turbines. He started as a coal miner and appreciated the fresh air and beauty of nature, as did all coal miners and pit ponies. The work being done by the Alex Hill company is also exceedingly important. No sane person can deny the existence of thess new sources of energy. The wind turbines around here have been such a complete disaster that most people are going back to coal and wood burning, and new pits like Aberpergwm are opening around here. Turbines have driven up electricity prices very sharply, and as usual, the poor get hit the hardest. However energy form spacetime and LENR will hopefully eliminate any need for fossil fuel burning. new and very tough laws are needed to prosecute people who bother the scientists who are doing this important work. It is a pleasure to do what I can to help.

Happy New Year to all!
Blwyddyn Newydd Dda i Bawb!

cc Prime Minister’s Office and Martin Caton, M.P.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/12/2013 17:27:35 GMT Standard Time
Subj: More on Rossi&apos;s LENR reactor

Dear Myron. Enclosed is a recent link on the Rossi device which supports and enhances the report several months ago regarding the three tests conducted by a team of scientists:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/12/rossi-provides-more-explosive-e-cat-information/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rossi-provides-more-explosive-e-cat-information

Most notable here to me is the extraordinary temperature rise Rossi reports; you have me very well trained to think they must be finding some spin coupling resonance and being able to sustain that. Now, in addition to high power levels reported earlier this year, we have very short times for increased power levels, and apparently the ability to sustain those power levels for some significant time period.

It seems the limiting commercial factor now is in controlling the reaction, which is simply an engineering problem. I do not trivialize the engineering work at all, pace Horst and Doug, but this kind of engineering problem indicates a very powerful underlying physical mechanism.

So I add this to my kit of potential evidence for what may be a true breakthrough, and feel deeply how important your work is to fully understanding and using this discovery.

Very best,

Steve Bannister
University of Utah

255(4) : The Correct Second Bianchi Identity

This is Eq. (25), with torsion. The second Bianchi identity is derived from the first Bianchi identity. Full details are given to supplement UFT88. It is shown that the second Bianchi identity is a trivial extension of the first Bianchi identity, and both are incorrect due to neglect of torsion. In consequence the Einstein field equation is trivially incorrect, as is the entire Einstein era of physics. The post Einstein era relies on the Cartan identity and the Evans identity, which are rigorously correct identities of geometry. There is no need to consider further the second Bianchi identity, the Cartan identity is adequate both for gravitation and electromagnetism.

a255thpapernotes4.pdf

The Thought Police of Philosophy

This is a precise and interesting summary as usual by Dr. Melanie Purcell. Aristotelians ruled for over a thousand years until Bacon initiated the enlightenment along with figures such as Copernicus, Galileo, Brahe, Kepler and Newton described in the online “The Sleepwalkers” by Arthur Koestler. The Einsteinian era was a regression to darkness. It is kept alive by our very own contemporary thought police, lurking in the cesspits of society. When dealing with the them the scientist smiles in secret and looks at Cartan geometry, or studies UFT88 and UFT225. The hierarchy in the Higgs pantomine had to make sure that nothing was discovered in order to feed themselves a lot of money. As Dr Purcell argues here, that was “extremely unscientific, sensational and entirely fictional …” No collection of circus clowns could make us laugh so heartily were it not all so evil.

Things can get nasty

this is the sad state of affairs with most disciplines, unless one’s work is entirely useful for a specific form of information that serves corporate partnerships with academic institutions, or indeed, in support of a “criminal landscape”…and in this, such work may be extremely unscientific, sensational and entirely fictional or mixed with half truths which hook an audience that is inherently disenfranchised from scientific knowledge, or may simply appeal to the presumption of a “natural” or inherent corruption in the human being which is thought to be impossible to transcend …for example a relatively recent book called “In praise of Prejudice”. There is no mention of the means through which a higher order of information may be accessed from that which is apparent. In fact the visible is commonly denied as the font of illusion, incapable of leading us on towards higher truths………..there are so many philosophical works that simply get caught in the semantic/semiotic debate, or the labyrinth of mystical notions, and generally add to the confusion, where the notion of conspiracy stimulates the anarchistic intention to destroy the very things which attempt to provide necessary services for a civilised and complex society. These works I see to be most useful to those who seek to negate the value of context, of revelations regarding the source and cause of evidence, of the process within which the gathering of raw data, its dependence on specific technological defined tools and domains, and the implications of these, or the denial of there being facts at all, or any means of accessing truth and in turn of accessing a sensible comprehension of the aspects of reality that our technologies have permitted us to engage with—-with our gaze cast on macrocosmic and microcosmic domains that have previously been impossible, in a manner where the progression of technologies, also progressively conceals the foundational means through which such technologies have come into being in the first place…….and for whatever reason- be it couched in terms of supporting or negating forms of theology or other culturally conditional impositions which arise from the construction or deconstruction of fixed social hierarchies or cast systems which reflect some simplistic presumption of a naturally occurring hierarchies and the assumed right for top down information flows and control systems—- all a necessity particularly if the realisation of foundational research is itself negated from the child’s process of educational induction……….the maintenance of an adult/ child distinction, where the child is not permitted to become an adult, and is instead cultivated to accept fictions is a problem which takes us right back to plato’s hope for a censorship of the very fictions (particularly in his case, concerning the myths of chronos et all related “gods and goddesses”) which destroy or conceal the means through which a scientifically matured community of adults may flourish……..in fact the opposite form of a community than that which an oligarch, despot or tyrant would wish to cultivate…….and as such, Plato informs us of a principled attempt to reveal which is contrary to Aristotle’s political point of view which supports those who seek to deny education of foundational facts to masses.

best regards

melanie

Experimentation under Question

I have never heard of Rick Delano, but COBE / FIRAS is certainly dubious. In my opinion all the experimentation that was used in the old Einstein era should come under the microscope as Crothers is doing here. The Einstein field equation is meaningless (e.g. UFT88) because it neglects torsion. Stephen Crothers has shown many times over that the methods of the old Einstein era are erroneous. I no longer read articles based on the old Einstein era because they would waste my time and that of AIAS. In my experience the old physics was and is intellectually dishonest, for example it has failed completely to answer UFT225. Stephen Crothers should be elected to a chair of theoretical physics in my opinion to compensate for the cynical destruction of his Ph. D. studies by dogmatists.

Mr. DeLano,

Please refrain from cluttering this communication with your garrulous interference. The two simple questions are for Mr. Tegmark since Mr. Sungenius failed to answer them. You have vehemently expressed yourself extensively previously. Let Max Tegmark speak for himself.

We all await your answers Mr. Tegmark. Or will you seek protection in silence instead of facing Professor Robitaille?

Stephen J. Crothers

(1) When you put a glass of water inside a microwave oven and turn it on does the water in the glass reflect the microwaves or does it absorb them?

(2) Is a powerful absorber of microwaves also a powerful emitter thereof?

Stephen J. Crothers

WebLog Feedback 26-27/12/13

On 26/12/13 there were 3219 hits from 743 distinct visits. On 27/12/13 there were 2269 hits from 526 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN, softlayer and yandex. Bosch Company UNCC Saga 1; Harish-Chandra Research Institute India CV, Universe of Myron Evans; Japanese University of Electrocommunications Department of Electronic Engineering LCR Resonant 2; Mesh Corporation Japan general; Edu System Pakistan Numerical Solutions; School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences University of Edinburgh UFT177. Intense interest all sectors.

The Second Bianchi Identity

This is in differential form notation:

d ^ R sup a sub b + omega sup a sub c ^ R sup c sub b – R sup a sub c ^ omega sup c sub b = 0

and is eq. (3.141) of Carroll’s online notes. Note carefully that it neglects torsion. UFT88 restores the torsion. In vector notation it is for spacelike indices:

del dot R sup a sub b + omega sup a sub c dot R sup c sub b – R sup a sub c dot omega sup c sub b = 0

Einstein used it as the basis for his field equation of 1915 but it is completely wrong because it neglects torsion. Obviously torsion was not known to Bianchi, and Einstein used Bianchi uncritically. In the next note I will attempt to correct it in a simple way with vector notation rather than tensor notation as in UFT88, where the correct Cartan identity was used as a starting point. The second Bianchi identity is obsolete and is no longer needed in gravitational theory because it has been replaced by the Cartan and Evans identities. Nevertheless it is very interesting to correct it as in UFT88. The latter give a vast amount of information because they have the same structure as the electromagnetic field equations. Obviously there are thousands of textbooks on electromagnetic theory, electricity and magnetism. Being just one individual, working with a small group able colleagues, I have only had time to produce a microscopic fraction of what is possible with the ECE theory of gravitation, but what has been produced is very interesting. So I must be careful and selective in what work I am going to do.