Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

Welcome back and happy new year to Doug and yourself! I agree about the Lamb shift, and will send over the first calculation shortly. It is very simple, and uses the minimal prescription to define a vacuum angular momentum via the vector potential. The standard approach is claimed to be precise, but in views of UFT85 that claim is almost certainly wildly optimistic.

Sent: 01/01/2016 13:22:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

I am back and will catch up with the latest notes now. Studying the impact of “classical” ECE2 vacuum is very important and up to date. A lot of people is currently trying to reproduce the devices of Keshe. Also some people here in Munich are trying to reproduce them. Keshe asserts that they work by utilizing the vacuum anyway but he is not able to give an explanation in clear physical terms. His online seminars are very chaotic. The devices are “low tech”, you have to produce certain salts by “kitchen chemistry” and use a coil with coated copper wires for example. Currently I am thinking how this can be explained by a reasonable physical theory. My current working hypothesis is that the coating of wires enhances the interaction of matter with the vacuum flow which I equate with the vector potential. Enhanced interaction means creation of vorticity in the vector potential, and according to ECE2 then a magnetic field is created which should enhance that produced conventionally by the coil. The mechanical interaction mechanism between vacuum flow (vector potential) and matter is currently open. I f someone has a good idea, please let me know.
The Lamb shift is certainly created by the non-rotational part of the vector potential, this part has never been considered in physics (except time oscillations which contribute to the electric field). So UFT 337 should become an important paper.

Horst

Am 01.01.2016 um 12:34 schrieb EMyrone:

This paper will aim to explain the Lamb shift in the H atom with the Aharonov Bohm vector potential of ECE2. This means that the same vacuum will be used for both phenomena. At present they are explained with diametrically different ideas about the vacuum. The definitive papers on the ECE vacuum are the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers UFT292 – UFT299, being very heavily studied in their own right. The ECE2 series is very successful, and was all written in the second half of 2015, UFT313-320, 332-336 published to date. Their progress is closely monitored evrey early morning GMT and posted on this blog. The ratio of ECE2 papers to top ten items is steadily increasing as the ECE2 series becomes increasingly studied across the world. This means steady study of the ECE2 papers every day. The series has developed a new special relativity in a space with non zero torsion (T) and curvature (R). So all physicists can agree on the equations. It is now a matter of very important difference of natural philosophy. In ECE2, special relativity is written in a space with non-zero T and R and finite spin connection, and in the original 1880’s special relativity of Fitzgerald, Heaviside, Lorentz and others, it is written in a flat space (T = 0, R = 0, zero spin connection). ECE2 goes well beyond the obsolete Einsteinian general relativity, and UFT325 shows signs of being a classic because it produces precession without using Einstein’s ideas at all. These ideas of his were of course powerful and imaginative, but unfortunately omitted torsion. So they cannot be correct. By now this is common knowledge and the teachings of the obsolete physics are rejected as they occur.

Leave a Reply