337(3): New Effects of the Vacuum Scalar Potential in Atomic Hydrogen

This note uses the minimal prescription E goes to E – e phi, where phi is the vacuum scalar potential, to deduce many new effect hitherto missed in spectroscopy. The obsolete Dirac approximation is used just for the sake of development. There are new fine structure terms and many more that the note defines for the first time. For example Eq. (45) is one way of measuring the scalar potential if the vacuum from the well known fine structure of the H atom. In this analysis the vacuum contains no electric and magnetic fields, but contains the scalar potential phi. The mathematics are the same in ECE2 and the old theories of physics, but there is a key philosophical difference.

a337thpapernotes3.pdf

Vague Ideas

I think that vagueness is the biggest single obstacle to progress, some of it is totally incomprehensible and unscientific. So in the latest UFT336 and UFT337 I have set out to develop a precise theory of vacuum energy on the simplest possible level, one that no one can argue with, not even the most conservative dogmatist, because the theory is very simple and uses their own equations. The major philosophical difference is that ECE2 used torsion and curvature, the original special relativity does not. The actual equations are the same, and should be very familiar to every physicist. A usual, well known theory is used in an entirely new way.

03/01/2016 19:16:30 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

Hi Horst,

Yes, I agree that his eccentric way of explaining things is very different. To my mind this is on purpose, 1) to try to string along enough funding without letting the cat out of the bag, and 2) he could be dealing with something he has not studied anywhere else (i.e. ECE2) that could explain things for him. As a result, he makes up his own name for things as oppose to using something like “rotating stratified plasma with a vacuum at it’s center that solidifies into strange new elements when rotation stops…similar to a flash-cooling, but in this case either flash-rotation or flash-voltage potential”…etc.. Either way, shuffling through the jargon and just focusing on the technical is the only way to make sense of this work.

Best regards,
Franklin

On 1/3/2016 10:39 AM, Horst Eckardt wrote:

Hi Franklin,

thanks for your interesting comments. The problem with Keshe is that he uses established physical terms in a very eccentric way. His “plasma” seems to be a vacuum or ether flow, and I tried to think about it in these terms. Your comments corroborate my working hypothesis that the surface modifications impact the flow of the vector potential and thereby generate magnetic and possibly electric fields. To understand this fully, we would have to set up a vector model with ECE2 equations. I hope that my colleagues will succeed in reproducing a Keshe device which seems not to be so easy at the moment. Then we have definit conditions and can think about a detailed vector model. Thinking out of the box is essential for understanding this new type of physics.
Currently I am also working on a modification of the Osamu Ide device, I will see if this can be confirmed to a certain extend experimentally before I am going public with the paper, I do not want to embarrass myself 🙂

Best regards,
Horst

Am 03.01.2016 um 19:17 schrieb Franklin Amador:

Horst,

Welcome back and Happy New years. I saw your email on Keshe’s devices and wanted to let you know my thoughts about his work.

1) The “kitchen chemistry” is to create nano-wires on the surface of the copper coils or possibly any non-metal surfaces. This is something that increases surface area for vector potential interaction. In my own literature research, I’ve found that these nano-wires also act as a “Voltage Multiplier” further increasing the vector potential interaction. This is why he needs these coated materials…to simply and passively create a voltage multiplication effect. So, with further mechanical rotation of this high voltage multiplication effect, the ECE2 theory asserts the magnetic field out of rotating electric field.

2) The circular reaction chamber has several purposes. Not only does it server as a high voltage plasma source for the nano-wires on item 1 above but also the spherical waves from stratified noble gases as a result of rotation, which seem to be an incubation chamber for further chemical interactions (i.e. LENR). It’s my believe the High-Voltage and High Magnetic field (via Rotating Voltage ala ECE2) creates the necessary fusion reactions similar to what the sun does at it’s core….so, yes, not only attributed to pressure and heat. It seems to me that simple hydrogen can get the reaction started, but with further elements (i.e. noble gases), more interesting effects are pronounced. If it was up to me, I would design a system that uses water because of it’s inert chemical stability but also it’s abundance in the galaxy. The trick, out of the box thinking, is to electrolyze water via high AC voltage and not high DC amps, as we are strangely thought in university. Then you can use separate rotating Hydrogen and Oxygen chambers. On a side note, there are plenty of Tibetan Mandalas deceptions that would overlap some of these designs, which I find very fascinating and amazingly coincidental.

3) To interact with gravity, I propose two of these spherical cores at it’s center in magnetic (rotational) opposition. Then include several units on the periphery with individually controlled motors for CCW or CW rotation control. I believe I had sketch this out for Dr. Evans a few years back.

4) The medical benefits he talks about is related to the oscillating magnetic fields that would enter the body in close proximity to the units. This has the same effect as using voltage probes Dr. Royal Raymond Rife used to get rid of viruses or bacteria from the body at specific resonant frequencies.

If you would like further information then I can put you in contact with someone that has researched Keshe’s work in more detailed than I have.

Your friend,
Franklin

On 1/2/2016 12:48 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Welcome back and happy new year to Doug and yourself! I agree about the Lamb shift, and will send over the first calculation shortly. It is very simple, and uses the minimal prescription to define a vacuum angular momentum via the vector potential. The standard approach is claimed to be precise, but in views of UFT85 that claim is almost certainly wildly optimistic.

Sent: 01/01/2016 13:22:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

I am back and will catch up with the latest notes now. Studying the impact of “classical” ECE2 vacuum is very important and up to date. A lot of people is currently trying to reproduce the devices of Keshe. Also some people here in Munich are trying to reproduce them. Keshe asserts that they work by utilizing the vacuum anyway but he is not able to give an explanation in clear physical terms. His online seminars are very chaotic. The devices are “low tech”, you have to produce certain salts by “kitchen chemistry” and use a coil with coated copper wires for example. Currently I am thinking how this can be explained by a reasonable physical theory. My current working hypothesis is that the coating of wires enhances the interaction of matter with the vacuum flow which I equate with the vector potential. Enhanced interaction means creation of vorticity in the vector potential, and according to ECE2 then a magnetic field is created which should enhance that produced conventionally by the coil. The mechanical interaction mechanism between vacuum flow (vector potential) and matter is currently open. I f someone has a good idea, please let me know.
The Lamb shift is certainly created by the non-rotational part of the vector potential, this part has never been considered in physics (except time oscillations which contribute to the electric field). So UFT 337 should become an important paper.

Horst

Am 01.01.2016 um 12:34 schrieb EMyrone:

This paper will aim to explain the Lamb shift in the H atom with the Aharonov Bohm vector potential of ECE2. This means that the same vacuum will be used for both phenomena. At present they are explained with diametrically different ideas about the vacuum. The definitive papers on the ECE vacuum are the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers UFT292 – UFT299, being very heavily studied in their own right. The ECE2 series is very successful, and was all written in the second half of 2015, UFT313-320, 332-336 published to date. Their progress is closely monitored evrey early morning GMT and posted on this blog. The ratio of ECE2 papers to top ten items is steadily increasing as the ECE2 series becomes increasingly studied across the world. This means steady study of the ECE2 papers every day. The series has developed a new special relativity in a space with non zero torsion (T) and curvature (R). So all physicists can agree on the equations. It is now a matter of very important difference of natural philosophy. In ECE2, special relativity is written in a space with non-zero T and R and finite spin connection, and in the original 1880’s special relativity of Fitzgerald, Heaviside, Lorentz and others, it is written in a flat space (T = 0, R = 0, zero spin connection). ECE2 goes well beyond the obsolete Einsteinian general relativity, and UFT325 shows signs of being a classic because it produces precession without using Einstein’s ideas at all. These ideas of his were of course powerful and imaginative, but unfortunately omitted torsion. So they cannot be correct. By now this is common knowledge and the teachings of the obsolete physics are rejected as they occur.

Application of ECE2 Theory

This is the key point of course, application of ECE2 theory to rigorously reproducible and repeatable new energy devices. I agree with Dr. Horst Eckardt that there is nothing worse than applying theory to something that turns out to be artifact, i.e. spurious. This is why I waited a quarter century before applying theory to low energy nuclear reactors. The tremendous and very bitter controversy seems to have come down on the side of LENR. It is up to industry and government to develop LENR and spacetime devices as fast as possible because it is known that wind turbines are almost completely useless in high winds. The climate produces increased frequency of storms with high winds. So wind turbines should just be dismantled at developer expense. These cynical profiteers should be obliged by law to pay back the subsidies that they wasted on useless contraptions, and clean up the environmental mess that they have created, again at their own expense. In order to convince the general public, LENR devices have to be in the shops and used at home with all despatch, otherwise people will lose interest. I discussed this with Jeff Rense on his Radio Show. The Baconian principles of reproducibility and repeatability should be familiar to every engineer. UFT311 is the first paper to show that the ideas of ECE and ECE2 can be used to describe a precisely defined circuit by Osamu Ide whose details are all available. For the first time, devices taking energy from spacetime have been represented to a mainstream Royal Society of Chemistry conference at Tsukuba University, Japan, without a single objection. The slef charging inverter paper has been posted on www.aias.us. So the key advance needed right away is organization by government and industry of large scale manufacture of LENR and spacetime devices. I have been advocating this for well over a decade. I notice that obsolete dogmatists like ‘t Hooft still pour scorn and offensive sarcasm over the avant garde intellectuals, their favourite target being the capable Australian scholar Stephen Crothers. This attitude by people like ‘t Hooft does humankind much harm and he should be reigned in by his university administration. It is quite clear that he is being ignored by the colleagues.

Sent: 03/01/2016 18:39:49 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

Hi Franklin,

thanks for your interesting comments. The problem with Keshe is that he uses established physical terms in a very eccentric way. His “plasma” seems to be a vacuum or ether flow, and I tried to think about it in these terms. Your comments corroborate my working hypothesis that the surface modifications impact the flow of the vector potential and thereby generate magnetic and possibly electric fields. To understand this fully, we would have to set up a vector model with ECE2 equations. I hope that my colleagues will succeed in reproducing a Keshe device which seems not to be so easy at the moment. Then we have definit conditions and can think about a detailed vector model. Thinking out of the box is essential for understanding this new type of physics.
Currently I am also working on a modification of the Osamu Ide device, I will see if this can be confirmed to a certain extend experimentally before I am going public with the paper, I do not want to embarrass myself 🙂

Best regards,
Horst

Am 03.01.2016 um 19:17 schrieb Franklin Amador:

Horst,

Welcome back and Happy New years. I saw your email on Keshe’s devices and wanted to let you know my thoughts about his work.

1) The “kitchen chemistry” is to create nano-wires on the surface of the copper coils or possibly any non-metal surfaces. This is something that increases surface area for vector potential interaction. In my own literature research, I’ve found that these nano-wires also act as a “Voltage Multiplier” further increasing the vector potential interaction. This is why he needs these coated materials…to simply and passively create a voltage multiplication effect. So, with further mechanical rotation of this high voltage multiplication effect, the ECE2 theory asserts the magnetic field out of rotating electric field.

2) The circular reaction chamber has several purposes. Not only does it server as a high voltage plasma source for the nano-wires on item 1 above but also the spherical waves from stratified noble gases as a result of rotation, which seem to be an incubation chamber for further chemical interactions (i.e. LENR). It’s my believe the High-Voltage and High Magnetic field (via Rotating Voltage ala ECE2) creates the necessary fusion reactions similar to what the sun does at it’s core….so, yes, not only attributed to pressure and heat. It seems to me that simple hydrogen can get the reaction started, but with further elements (i.e. noble gases), more interesting effects are pronounced. If it was up to me, I would design a system that uses water because of it’s inert chemical stability but also it’s abundance in the galaxy. The trick, out of the box thinking, is to electrolyze water via high AC voltage and not high DC amps, as we are strangely thought in university. Then you can use separate rotating Hydrogen and Oxygen chambers. On a side note, there are plenty of Tibetan Mandalas deceptions that would overlap some of these designs, which I find very fascinating and amazingly coincidental.

3) To interact with gravity, I propose two of these spherical cores at it’s center in magnetic (rotational) opposition. Then include several units on the periphery with individually controlled motors for CCW or CW rotation control. I believe I had sketch this out for Dr. Evans a few years back.

4) The medical benefits he talks about is related to the oscillating magnetic fields that would enter the body in close proximity to the units. This has the same effect as using voltage probes Dr. Royal Raymond Rife used to get rid of viruses or bacteria from the body at specific resonant frequencies.

If you would like further information then I can put you in contact with someone that has researched Keshe’s work in more detailed than I have.

Your friend,
Franklin

On 1/2/2016 12:48 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Welcome back and happy new year to Doug and yourself! I agree about the Lamb shift, and will send over the first calculation shortly. It is very simple, and uses the minimal prescription to define a vacuum angular momentum via the vector potential. The standard approach is claimed to be precise, but in views of UFT85 that claim is almost certainly wildly optimistic.

Sent: 01/01/2016 13:22:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

I am back and will catch up with the latest notes now. Studying the impact of “classical” ECE2 vacuum is very important and up to date. A lot of people is currently trying to reproduce the devices of Keshe. Also some people here in Munich are trying to reproduce them. Keshe asserts that they work by utilizing the vacuum anyway but he is not able to give an explanation in clear physical terms. His online seminars are very chaotic. The devices are “low tech”, you have to produce certain salts by “kitchen chemistry” and use a coil with coated copper wires for example. Currently I am thinking how this can be explained by a reasonable physical theory. My current working hypothesis is that the coating of wires enhances the interaction of matter with the vacuum flow which I equate with the vector potential. Enhanced interaction means creation of vorticity in the vector potential, and according to ECE2 then a magnetic field is created which should enhance that produced conventionally by the coil. The mechanical interaction mechanism between vacuum flow (vector potential) and matter is currently open. I f someone has a good idea, please let me know.
The Lamb shift is certainly created by the non-rotational part of the vector potential, this part has never been considered in physics (except time oscillations which contribute to the electric field). So UFT 337 should become an important paper.

Horst

Am 01.01.2016 um 12:34 schrieb EMyrone:

This paper will aim to explain the Lamb shift in the H atom with the Aharonov Bohm vector potential of ECE2. This means that the same vacuum will be used for both phenomena. At present they are explained with diametrically different ideas about the vacuum. The definitive papers on the ECE vacuum are the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers UFT292 – UFT299, being very heavily studied in their own right. The ECE2 series is very successful, and was all written in the second half of 2015, UFT313-320, 332-336 published to date. Their progress is closely monitored evrey early morning GMT and posted on this blog. The ratio of ECE2 papers to top ten items is steadily increasing as the ECE2 series becomes increasingly studied across the world. This means steady study of the ECE2 papers every day. The series has developed a new special relativity in a space with non zero torsion (T) and curvature (R). So all physicists can agree on the equations. It is now a matter of very important difference of natural philosophy. In ECE2, special relativity is written in a space with non-zero T and R and finite spin connection, and in the original 1880’s special relativity of Fitzgerald, Heaviside, Lorentz and others, it is written in a flat space (T = 0, R = 0, zero spin connection). ECE2 goes well beyond the obsolete Einsteinian general relativity, and UFT325 shows signs of being a classic because it produces precession without using Einstein’s ideas at all. These ideas of his were of course powerful and imaginative, but unfortunately omitted torsion. So they cannot be correct. By now this is common knowledge and the teachings of the obsolete physics are rejected as they occur.

Keshe Devices

Happy New year to Franklin Amador and Family! In my opinion an all out international effort is needed to effectively and quickly develop all kinds of devices such as this that take energy from spacetime. I met Franklin Amador at Craig y Nos Castle and he voluntarily typeset volumes of “Generally Covariant Unified Field Theory”, a great amount of work.

Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

Horst,

Welcome back and Happy New years. I saw your email on Keshe’s devices and wanted to let you know my thoughts about his work.

1) The “kitchen chemistry” is to create nano-wires on the surface of the copper coils or possibly any non-metal surfaces. This is something that increases surface area for vector potential interaction. In my own literature research, I’ve found that these nano-wires also act as a “Voltage Multiplier” further increasing the vector potential interaction. This is why he needs these coated materials…to simply and passively create a voltage multiplication effect. So, with further mechanical rotation of this high voltage multiplication effect, the ECE2 theory asserts the magnetic field out of rotating electric field.

2) The circular reaction chamber has several purposes. Not only does it server as a high voltage plasma source for the nano-wires on item 1 above but also the spherical waves from stratified noble gases as a result of rotation, which seem to be an incubation chamber for further chemical interactions (i.e. LENR). It’s my believe the High-Voltage and High Magnetic field (via Rotating Voltage ala ECE2) creates the necessary fusion reactions similar to what the sun does at it’s core….so, yes, not only attributed to pressure and heat. It seems to me that simple hydrogen can get the reaction started, but with further elements (i.e. noble gases), more interesting effects are pronounced. If it was up to me, I would design a system that uses water because of it’s inert chemical stability but also it’s abundance in the galaxy. The trick, out of the box thinking, is to electrolyze water via high AC voltage and not high DC amps, as we are strangely thought in university. Then you can use separate rotating Hydrogen and Oxygen chambers. On a side note, there are plenty of Tibetan Mandalas deceptions that would overlap some of these designs, which I find very fascinating and amazingly coincidental.

3) To interact with gravity, I propose two of these spherical cores at it’s center in magnetic (rotational) opposition. Then include several units on the periphery with individually controlled motors for CCW or CW rotation control. I believe I had sketch this out for Dr. Evans a few years back.

4) The medical benefits he talks about is related to the oscillating magnetic fields that would enter the body in close proximity to the units. This has the same effect as using voltage probes Dr. Royal Raymond Rife used to get rid of viruses or bacteria from the body at specific resonant frequencies.

If you would like further information then I can put you in contact with someone that has researched Keshe’s work in more detailed than I have.

Your friend,
Franklin

On 1/2/2016 12:48 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Welcome back and happy new year to Doug and yourself! I agree about the Lamb shift, and will send over the first calculation shortly. It is very simple, and uses the minimal prescription to define a vacuum angular momentum via the vector potential. The standard approach is claimed to be precise, but in views of UFT85 that claim is almost certainly wildly optimistic.

Sent: 01/01/2016 13:22:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Plans for UFT337 / Keshe devices

I am back and will catch up with the latest notes now. Studying the impact of “classical” ECE2 vacuum is very important and up to date. A lot of people is currently trying to reproduce the devices of Keshe. Also some people here in Munich are trying to reproduce them. Keshe asserts that they work by utilizing the vacuum anyway but he is not able to give an explanation in clear physical terms. His online seminars are very chaotic. The devices are “low tech”, you have to produce certain salts by “kitchen chemistry” and use a coil with coated copper wires for example. Currently I am thinking how this can be explained by a reasonable physical theory. My current working hypothesis is that the coating of wires enhances the interaction of matter with the vacuum flow which I equate with the vector potential. Enhanced interaction means creation of vorticity in the vector potential, and according to ECE2 then a magnetic field is created which should enhance that produced conventionally by the coil. The mechanical interaction mechanism between vacuum flow (vector potential) and matter is currently open. I f someone has a good idea, please let me know.
The Lamb shift is certainly created by the non-rotational part of the vector potential, this part has never been considered in physics (except time oscillations which contribute to the electric field). So UFT 337 should become an important paper.

Horst

Am 01.01.2016 um 12:34 schrieb EMyrone:

This paper will aim to explain the Lamb shift in the H atom with the Aharonov Bohm vector potential of ECE2. This means that the same vacuum will be used for both phenomena. At present they are explained with diametrically different ideas about the vacuum. The definitive papers on the ECE vacuum are the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers UFT292 – UFT299, being very heavily studied in their own right. The ECE2 series is very successful, and was all written in the second half of 2015, UFT313-320, 332-336 published to date. Their progress is closely monitored evrey early morning GMT and posted on this blog. The ratio of ECE2 papers to top ten items is steadily increasing as the ECE2 series becomes increasingly studied across the world. This means steady study of the ECE2 papers every day. The series has developed a new special relativity in a space with non zero torsion (T) and curvature (R). So all physicists can agree on the equations. It is now a matter of very important difference of natural philosophy. In ECE2, special relativity is written in a space with non-zero T and R and finite spin connection, and in the original 1880’s special relativity of Fitzgerald, Heaviside, Lorentz and others, it is written in a flat space (T = 0, R = 0, zero spin connection). ECE2 goes well beyond the obsolete Einsteinian general relativity, and UFT325 shows signs of being a classic because it produces precession without using Einstein’s ideas at all. These ideas of his were of course powerful and imaginative, but unfortunately omitted torsion. So they cannot be correct. By now this is common knowledge and the teachings of the obsolete physics are rejected as they occur.

UFT88 Read in Charles University Prague

Charles University Prague is ranked 119 in the world by Webometrics and 401-500 by Times. It was founded in 1348 by Charles IV and currently has 51,438 students. Staff and students have frequently studied ECE theory for nearly fourteen years. It was originally split into four parts: Bohemian, Bavarian, Polish and Saxon. Its oldest building is the 14th century Carolinum and has a famous Baroque Library, now part of the Czech National Library. Einstein was appointed full professor of theoretical physics there in April 1911 and his circle of intellectuals and friends included Hugo Bargmann, Max Brod and Franz Kafka. Tycho Brahe and Johannes Kepler were Imperial Mathematici in Prague (equivalent to Civil List Pensioners) and a new Kepler Museum has opened at 4 Kalova Street. UFT88 has been studied an estimated fifty thousand times at least since Horst Eckardt and I wrote it in about 2008. Among avant garde intellectuals, it is the accepted and definitive refutation of Einstein’s ideas about gravitational physics, The most important theory in that field of the twentieth century. UFT88 has evolved into the ECE2 series of papers, UFT313 – UFT320, UFT322 – UFT336 to date. These are being intensely studied around the world, the most studied being UFT325, which produces planetary precession from ECE2 special relativity. Einstein thought that this was impossible. His famous and powerful general relativity is now known to be riddled with errors and has been corrected and developed into ECE2. Einsteinian GR remains a great theory, a pinnacle of human thought.

Daily Report Saturday 2/1/16

A total of 261,998 printed pages were downloaded during the day (951.6 megabytes), 2818 memory files downloaded (hits) from 542 distinct visits averaging 4.0 memory pages and 16 minutes duration, main spiders cnsat (China), google, MSN and yahoo. Top ten items 121, Collected scientometrics 47, Collected ECE2 37, Collected Evans / Morris 20(est), Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 16, Autobiography volumes one and two 13, UFT88 6, CEFE 5, UFT321 5, UFT311 3, Llais 3, Self charging inverter 2, Most prolific physicists and chemists in history 1. Three world records by MWE 1, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 1, UFT313 2, UFT315 2, UFT316 2, UFT317 3, UFT318 1, UFT319 2, UFT322 2, UFT323 3, UFT324 1, UFT325 7, UFT326 3, UFT327 1, UFT329 1, UFT331 2, UFT333 1, UFT335 3, UFT336 1 to date in January 2016. Mathematics and Physics Charles University Prague UFT88. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

337(2): The Effect of a Vacuum Scalar Potential on an Electron Matter Wave

This note is a very simple demonstration that the angular frequency as measured in any experiment is not an absolute value, it is always influenced by the vacuum scalar potential phi, which is ubiquitous and ever present. It can be used to generate energy. This fact is illustrated in an electron beam, whose wave function is changed by the scalar potential to Eq. (19) from Eq. (15). There is not enough information to solve Eq. (15) for the absolute angular frequency omega and then phi, (two unknowns and one equation), so more information is needed. This will be supplied in the next note in order to estimate the scalar potential of the vacuum, thought of as a region where potentials are present but no fields. In an electric Aharonov Bohm experiment, the phi from a shielded electric field strength E produces the electron wave function (19), and there is a shift in the Young interferogram of two interfering electron beams, even though E does not interact directly with the electron beams.

a337thpapernotes2.pdf

Daily Report 1/1/16

A total of 121,873 printed pages were downloaded around the world during the day (443.51 mbytes), 1704 hits or memory files downloaded from 371 distinct visits averaging 3.7 memory pages and 21 minutes duration, main spiders cnsat (China), google, MSN and yahoo. Top ten items 88, Collected scientometrics 39, Collected ECE2 14, Collected Evans / Morris papers 10 (est), Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 7, Autobiography volumes one and two 5, UFT88 4, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 3, CEFE 2, UFT321 2, Engineering Model 2, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 2, Llais 1, Principles of ECE 1, UFT316 1, UFT319 2, UFT322 1, UFT323 3, UFT325 1, UFT327 1, UFT331 1, UFT333 1, UFT335 2 to date in January 2016. British Broadcasting Corporation London UFT33 “Metric Compatibility Condition and Tetrad Postulate”. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

337(1) : Lamb Shift due to the Angular momentum of the AB Vacuum

This is a straightforward calculation of the Lamb shift in atomic H, and shows that it is due to the AB vacuum angular momentum (39) of the minimal prescription, three orders of magnitude less than the reduced Planck constant. The angular momentum of an electron in the H atom is of the order of the Planck constant, so the calculation makes sense. The result produces the vacuum vector potential (37) in a rough approximation. In this view, the Lamb shift is an increase of about a gigahertz in the 2P1/2 level of atomic H, the 2S1/2 level remaining unchanged. In the usual approach, the vacuum is said to possess electric and magnetic fields, and in the usual view it is claimed that the 2S1/2 level is decreased and the 2P1/2 level unchanged. The net result from the two points of view is the same. This new theory however uses an approach which develops the vacuum self consistently as an AB vacuum, in which there exists potentials but no fields. So the Lamb shift becomes a type of Aharonov Bohm effect. This calculation is simply the minimal prescription:

p goes to p – eA

where A is the AB vacuum’s vector potential. It shows in a very clear way that the vacuum (i.e. spacetime) is able to affect an electron in the H atom, and this is observed in the Lamb shift. In an electron beam the calculation is even simpler. So the potential A is able to affect an electron in a circuit, notably the circuit used in UFT311. This is what si meant by electric energy from spacetime. This is the simplest theory possible. The anomalous g factor of the electron can be calculated in the same way and so can all the radiative corrections.

a337thpapernotes1.pdf

Discussion of 336(5): Electron Spin Resonance Due to the Vacuum

These are interesting remarks. The curl of A in the AB vacuum can be thought of as an effective magnetic field arising from the AB vacuum, so there is an ESR resonance in an electron beam even though there is no magnet present. Similarly in the Chambers experiment there is an effect on the Young interferogram of two electron beams even though there is no magnetic field present, i.e. no magnetic field acting directly on the electron beams. For a very long time this was the subject of intense debate as you know. So Aharanov had to wait a very long time for his well deserved Wolf Prize. In ECE, the AB effect was first developed in UFT8. Your vacuum papers with Doug, UFT292 to UFT299 are becoming classics, intensely studied worldwide. Your ideas are valid and can also be worked out.

Sent: 01/01/2016 23:24:58 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 336(5): Electron Spin Resonance Due to the Vacuum

The ESR type Hamiltonian (40) for the vacuum potential contains the curl of the vacuum vector potential. So there is a vacuum magnetic field although there is none according to the AB effect. This is obviously the approach of discerning a vacuum field from a standard e-m field (in both of field and potential quantities). This approach is justified but not the only possible one. Another approach would be to use a unique potential for both cases. This has to be curl-free in case of the AB effect. The ESR effect then should be derived without using the Pauli Algebra, for example using other terms in eq.(31), if they are not too tiny (my suggestion).

Horst

Am 29.12.2015 um 13:08 schrieb EMyrone:

This note opens up a new phase of ECE2 theory, beginning with the completely original theoretical demonstration that the vacuum produces electron spin resonance. By inference the vacuum produces nuclear magnetic resonance. So the properties of the vacuum can be explored in this way, through ESR in an electron beam and NMR in atoms and molecules. This would eb a precise and unequivocal demonstration that the vacuum produces resonance effects due to the the transfer of vacuum energy to material matter. The extra energy produced by the vacuum is the ESR resonance angular frequency multiplied by h bar. An experiment to detect this effect could be carried out by an adaptation of the well known Chambers experiment, where electron beams in a Young interferometer are affected by a magnetic field shielded from the beams, so only the potential is affected. The Young interferometer is replaced by a device to detect electron spin resonance. The Chambers experiment itself can be explained by the interaction of the vacuum vector potential with the electron beams. So I will now proceed to write up UFT336 parts one and two, in co authorship with Horst Eckardt as usual.