Fractal Universe

Norman Page wrote:

https://rloldershaw.people.amherst.edu/newdevyear/2008/March.htm#:~:text=THE%20MEANING%20OF%20PLANCK’S%20CONSTANT&text=(6)%20makes%20it%20explicit%20that,action%20for%20Atomic%20Scale%20systems.

The universe is fractal at the Plank constants. The best example is the Mandelbrot set which becomes degenerate after iterations down to the Plank constants
image.png
I think this means that in the Bessel functions the Y axis leaves the photon with mass and 3 D extension. and the x axis goes to a finite limit in time.
Horst’s answer:
This is indeed an interesting article. Defining scales of similarity seems to work, at least in certain cases. I do not agree on some points, for example: on quantum level of atoms and molecules, there is no predominance of gravitation as is claimed by the inverse fine structure constant of 1/alpha=137. The Schrödinger and Dirac equation are purely electromagnetic and work nearly perfectly. On sub-atomic level the claim may be true. We have used m theory in some papers on this level and obtained encouraging results. Oldershaw takes mini-black holes for qualitative argument, lacking better theories.
Interpreting wave function densities as “subquantum scale plasma particles” may be not so wrong. This is what we call aether or vacuum structure, and I am convinced that on the Planck scale, aether is built from discrete mini-particles. Dynamic processes (for exampel how a pointlike electron becomes an extended wave structure) may be explainable by ECE dynamics. ECE theory provides many new means to investigate suche effects closer.