## Archive for October, 2010

### Raman and Neutron Scattering

Saturday, October 30th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:57 PM
Author: metric345
Subject: Raman and Neutron Scattering

 I would say that the Dirac equation describes the case of a free particle, with the mass m0. When there is field / particle interaction, m becomes the covariant mass: m = (h bar / c) root R I have been referring to R as curvature but more accurately it depends on torsion and curvature. R is the last vestige of the old Einstein general relativity, in which R = – kT. As soon as momentum conservation is considered the old physics fails very badly, indeed fails completely. It can describe only the energy conservation. In quantum field theory Ryder describes the methods of dealing with more than one particle in quantum field theory. we are right at the start of a new era in natural philosophy, so anyone’s ideas are equally valid provided they can be put into mathematics and are not too vague.

View article…

### Nutshell Summary

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:45 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Nutshell Summary

 The curvature R is proportional to m squared, where m is the apparently varying mass found in the Compton effect through use of the de Broglie postulates. So an apparently negative mass m will produce a positive R, an apparently pure imaginary mass (i m) will produce positive R = mm* and an apparently complex mass: m = m’ + i m” will give a curvature proportional to mm* again, where m* is the complex conjugate of m. The elementary particle mass m0 is always positive, real valued and constant.

View article…

### 161(6): Definition of the October Postulates – General Compton Scattering

Friday, October 29th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, October 28, 2010 3:23 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 161(6): Definition of the October Postulates – General Compton Scattering

 The postulates are eqs. (15) and (16). The concept of mass appearing in the de Broglie postulates (16) is generalized to m2 squared = (R / R0) m squared where m is the mass of the electron appearing in the standards laboratories, and where m2 is the apparent mass given by the general theory of Compton scattering. a161stpapernotes6.pdf

View article…

### Overall Result of Note 161(5)

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 4:55 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Overall Result of Note 161(5)

 This is x = R / R0 = (h bar omega’ / (m c squared)) all squared It is seen that the curvature R of general relativity varies in proportion to omega’ squared while the mass m is constant. This is in the special case of 90 degree Compton scattering of an electron off another electron.

View article…

### Some Comments on Note 161(5)

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:02 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Some Comments on Note 161(5)

 The essential point is that x = R / R0, where R0 is the constant curvature (mc / h) squared of special relativity in flat spacetime, the limiting curvature of the Dirac equation and its classical limit, the Einstein energy equation. The electron mass m is a constant, the usual electron mass of the standards laboratories, known experimentally to ten power minus eight relative uncertainty. The mass m is the same and constant also in curved spacetime, but R is not constant in curved spacetime. This leads to the new de Broglie Einstein postulates. I suggest calling these the October Postulates, similar to the October Revolution, but without bloodshed or rancour.

View article…

### 161(5): Analytical Solution for x

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:52 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 161(5): Analytical Solution for x

 This is given by eq, (12) in general and is illustrated in the case of equal mass scattering at 90 degrees. The rest curvature R0 is defined by (10). The curvature in general relativity is defined by R = xR0 The Cartan geometry is worked out for Compton scattering at 90 degrees, giving the result (28). These are powerful new methods of physics and generalise the de Broglie Einstein equations, solving the self inconsistency problem found in UFT 158 to UFT 160 using ECE theory. The latter is preferred to the standard model from comparison with experimental data and Compton scattering is shown to be a phenomenon of general relativity and unified field theory, not of special relativity. a161stpapernotes5.pdf

View article…

### Modified de Broglie Postulates for UFT 161

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Monday, October 25, 2010 7:42 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Modified de Broglie Postulates for UFT 161

 These are for energy E = = gamma m c squared and for momentum: p = = gamma m v where < > denotes the thermal average calculated from the Planck distribution. This postulate will introduce temperature into the analysis as in UFT 155. The ECE theory, as for any other valid theory of physics, produces good results in quantum mechanics and special relativity when the two aspects are independent, but will run into the same problem as in UFT 158 – UFT 160. This is a profound problem needing the simplest plausible solution. Anyone’s ideas are as good as mine. These seem to be solid postulates, because at any finite temperature T, the average energy of one photon must be used. This is: = h bar omega exp (-x) (1 – exp (-x)) x = h bar omega / (kT) Each frequency has a different temperature. This modified postulate may fail as badly as the original, I must work this next.

View article…

### Some Comments on UFT 158 to 160

Saturday, October 23rd, 2010

It has been shown that the fundamentals of twentieth century physics are severely incorrect on the classical level. Special relativity is severely incompatible with Planck / Einstein /de Broglie quantum theory. This problem requires for its solution a new physics, a physics such as ECE, because the standard model cannot address it. For many years the standard model has put physics off course through the use of multidimensional string theory, and elaborate renormalization procedures in quantum electrodynamics. The old physics is so elaborate that it cannot be tested at all. We have just shown that it can be refuted with its own basic equations and using nothing else. None of the standard ideas will address the failure of the de Broglie Einstein theory to describe the Compton effect. The theory has failed for both the photon and the electron, so will fail for all other elementary particles. In addition, it is now well known that U(1), the mainstay of CERN and all that, is not the sector symmetry of electrodynamics, and it is also known that the Einstein field equation has failed through the neglect of torsion. The physics establishment is being heavily criticised at present for covering up failures such as this, so the establishment no longer exists because it no longer serves physics. It is well known that in addition to cover ups it has tried to censor new ideas such as ECE, a theory that has been accepted to great implicit acclaim worldwide.

### de Broglie Einstein Theory Fails

Saturday, October 23rd, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: de Broglie Einstein Theory Fails

 I have checked the theory with a hand calculator from note 160(5) and it fails completely. For some angles the carbon atom mass is negative, which is absurd. For angles greater than 90 degrees it is much too small. For example at 90 degrees the de Broglie Einstein theory gives: x2 = (omega omega’ – x1 squared) / (omega – omega’) which is negative because x1 = 7.76343 ten power 20 radians per second x2 = 1.6959 ten power 25 radians per second My hand calculator checks can be repeated by Dr Horst Eckardt with a desktop, and the results graphed. This is not just a minor failure, but a total failure of basic theory on the classical relativistic level. I will now proceed to write up UFT 160 with the new and much more transparent formulae. Recall that only the basic equations of the theory have been used, but used in a new way that reveals the theory to be drastically self inconsistent. Anyone with a hand calculator or desktop can check note 160(5). There must be books full of electron scattering data that can be used to make this check.

View article…

### Cross Check: Limit of the General Compton Equation (6) of Note 160(4)

Saturday, October 23rd, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:43 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Cross Check: Limit of the General Compton Equation (6) of Note 160(4)

 In the case of zero photon mass as in the standard model, then x1 is zero. In this case the equation reduces to 1 / omega’ – 1 / omega = (h bar / (m2 c squared) (1 – cos theta) whish is the textbook equation for Compton scattering for zero photon mass. Here: omega / c = 2 pi / lambda so lambda’ – lambda = (h / m2 c) (1 – cos theta) which is the usual textbook equation. So the textbook result is a mirage, it works only for zero photon mass. This is self contradictory because de Broglie postulated non zero photon mass. The theory does not work at all for the general scattering of m1 off m2 and does not work for finite photon mass m1.

View article…