Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

overview.pdf

I have found original documents from D / D Yc Ynys Cedwyn Estate papers which prove that Leonid Morgan is accurate without however quoting his sources. These sources have been found now by googling “John Morgan Richard Aubrey” last site. I refer you to my Aubrey line from Tudor times part two on www.aias.us and in my autobiography volume one.

1) 28th July 1564, conveyance from Ieuan (Gwyn ap) Morgan ap Richard to his brother John ap Morgan ap Richard (born about 1530) of Gwern y Gefeile (sic) (should be Gefail, the smithy, Gwern y Gefail means swampy land near the smithy) between Tir y Garth (enclosed land) and Gwaun yr Afar (Heathland of Sorrow). Therefore “Y Garth” was passed down in the family to Morgan ap Thomas y Garth (1735 – 1805) who married Elizabeth Portrey of Ynys Cedwyn Hall (1734 – 1825), his distant cousin .

2) Conveyance of 29th May 1577 from Richard ap Morgan ap Richard (Aubrey) to his brother John ap Morgan ap Richard (born about 1530).

3) Conveyance of 5th Nov. 1610 from John Morgan Prichard (John ap Morgan ap Richard Aubrey) and son Morgan John (Morgan ap John ap Morgan ap Richard Aubrey), Gentlemen, to son Thomas John (Thomas ap Morgan ap John buried at Callwen 27/6/1689). This proves that Thomas ap Morgan ap John was born before 1610. They are both recorded as Gentlemen, but this is not the Armiger rank of Gentleman because they did not have coats of arms. The patronymic system begins to give way to the modern system, but for clarity I give the accurate patronymic with the Norman Aubrey (or Awbrey) at the end. The names are given in several different ways in these very old documents, carefully preserved.

4) Quitclaim of 7th Nov. 1610 Morgan John of Ystradynlais to Thomas John. (i.e. Morgan ap John ap Morgan Aubrey to Thomas ap Morgan ap John Aubrey).

This is definitive proof of the line in part two of the Aubrey line and was probably studied by Leonid Morgan. I see that my work is being quoted verbatim on other sites.

In a message dated 29/06/2012 17:45:23 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Myron
I wish you a very successful meeting on Monday. I was hoipng I could find a way to get there, but not this year. So that you are aware of what I am doing, I mentioned this to Horst but I think I forgot to copy you – with the failure of the metric in spherically symmetric space-times, we need a substitute that will work for the antisymmetric connection so that the Hodge dual and hence electromagnetic theory fall easily from geometry. It seems to me that although the metric gives a means of calculating distance in any frame of reference, when twisting or torsion become involved, this distance no longer represents a single physical or geometric state (there are an infinite number of twisted states that are represented by a single distance scalar). At the moment I am adapting some old theory developed by Love, Rayleigh, Kirchoff, and others for the twisting of a curved slender rod. I think when I get my head around the four dimensional version of this, that a a scalar function direction cosines will come to play and important role, and we will end up with two expressions, a metric expression for distance, and a similar expression for accumulated twist, both of which must be satisfied when jumping from one coordinate system to the next (or perhaps some combination of the two).

Doug

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:39 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

As revision, this note gives a summary of errors in Einsteinian general relativity (EGR), and shows it to be a completely self inconsistent theory. The constrained Minkowski method results in eq. (31), and does not have the effective potential of EGR. The constraint is the observed orbit, which gives eq. (32). In the classical limit v << c the observed orbit is given by the new universal force law (20). This force law gives a precessing ellipse (19). Obviously, the force law of EGR, eq. (16), can never give a precessing ellipse. No amount of dogma can change elementary mathematics.

a223rdpapernotes2.pdf

In a message dated 29/06/2012 08:52:21 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

No.5 and Special issue will be dispatched to you today so you should have them for Monday

Victor

Victor Riecansky

Publisher

Cambridge International Science Publishing

www.cisp-publishing.com

ver@cisp-publishing.com

a223rdpapernotes3.pdf

And shall Trelawney live
Or shall Trelawney die?
Twenty thousand Cornish men
Wiil know the reason why.

Velow Trelawney bras
Velow Trelawney bras
Ottamma ugens mil Gernow
A wodhvyth oll an kas

Anyone who knows some Welsh will recognize the “ugens mil” – ugain mil – twenty thousand and ” a wodhvyth” – “a wybydd”, “will be known”. At the last elections the Liberal Democrats essentially disappeared. Cornish survivied them.