Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

Unfortunately these are again in words with no equations, but the review papers by Bostick in 1986 clarifies the ideas, that the universe is entirely electromagnetic and the basic mechanism is attributed to Beltrami equations. So ECE theory has now provided what was lacking in these early papers, a unified mathematical structure. Bostick rejected the standard model completely and attempted to produce a completely new physics. ECE has now achieved this aim, and AIAS has produced an efficient organization of science that cannot be stopped by blocking papers and destroying careers, or by any form of criminal harassment. So the standard model can now be considered to have been a total failure except for the golden age of physics. Bostick’s theory is quite interesting. By coincidence he looks at the Schroedinger equation of the free particle as a Beltrami solution ion his Figs (11) and (12). This is precisely what is done in UFT259. Reed reproduced figures from this review paper but of key importance, Reed gave clear equations which the AIAS group has already developed greatly. So the equations of ECE can do everything that Bostick did and also provide a new model for the electron, proton and neutron. One amusing comment is that of “belching black holes” and Bostick writes well, unusual for a scientist. He did fine work, which is what I would expect from a student of Compton. The review paper clarifies what is meant by a plasma model of the galaxy. For a long time I was puzzled how this model produces mass, obviously stars in a galaxy have mass, and are not charged, they are neutral. In fact the plasma model produces mass by fields alone. Bostick however has a tendency to take analogy too far. ECE on the other hand has been developed in a very careful way. I never discard concepts that have been proven. I discard gross errors and concepts that have not been proven. I can see that the small group of bigots that run the standard model also tried to ignore the plasma theory. Alfven was cold shouldered in his native Sweden. All this idiocy comes about through the oldest mistake in natural philosophy, refusing to give up a theory. ECE cannot be refuted at all, it is all based on geometry that cannot be refuted, Cartan geometry and a few very simple hypotheses. So I regard those who tried to distort ECE as being idiots, or worse, fraudsters. People who deliberately tried to misrepresent mathematics. They were rooted out fairly quickly by the international community, which is not an idiot. Collective intelligence through the internet is very powerful. Dogma is collective idiocy, also propagated by the internet. Human nature as usual.

Many thanks indeed, this is a great help. I am distributing them here for private scholarly study but not on to the blog for copyright reasons. Will start studying them.

Bosticketal.-2004-PairProductionofPlasmaVortices.pdf
stick-1986-WhatLaboratory-ProducedPlasmaStructuresCanCon.pdf

I wonder whether Steve Bannister and the University of Utah would provide me with the two following references:

1) W. Bostick, Phys. Fluids, 2078-2079 (1966).
2) W. Bostick, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., PS-41 (6), 7-3 – 717 (1986)

These are referred to by Reed, who gives the solution in his Figs. (8) and (9), and in words, but again no equations. Reed mentions that in this solution B, J, v and the vorticity curl v are all parallel. These are experimentally observed Beltrami solutions in plasma which can be used as a model for the neutron as in Filipponi sent on by Norman Page, and also as models for galaxies. Once I get the equations I can start work in earnest on the structure of the neutron, proton and electron. Probably these are counter rotating cylindrically symmetric Bessel function solutions of the type already animated by Horst Eckardt for one sense of rotation in UFT258. We now know that these are solutions of Cartan geometry and spacetime itself, i.e for the tetrad vector, spin connection vectgor, torsion vector and spin curvature vector. They will all have these intricate features which may well occur inside the neutron, proton and electron. Geometry applies on all scales as pointed out by Gareth Evans from sub elementary particle to galactic clusters.

Norman Page sent on this important link:

krwjones.com/wordpress/wp-content/2013/05/Fillipio_Importance_of_HydroED.pdf

which is paper by G. Filipponi, Int. J. Fusion Energy, 3 (1985) that describes a theory of the neutron in terms of the Bostick type currents described by Reed in M. W. Evans, Ed. “Modern Nonlinear Optics”, second edition, volume three (Wiley 2001). I will look up the mathematics of this solution, which is described in words in this article, and by Figure 4. It is now known that these mathematics are those of Cartan geometry itself in the absence of a magnetic monopole. Experiments on the neutron post 1932 when Chadwick discovered it, showed that its interior is empty and it is not structured like an atom with a positive charge in the centre (nucleus) and orbitals surrounding the centre. Filipponi uses a model of two charges close together. By looking up the Bostick solution in Reed, I should be able to work out what Filippino means. Unfortunately he gives words and diagrams but no equations. The neutron has a magnetic moment as is well known, but no net charge. The author describes the magnetic moment as “magnetic momentum”. When I find the solution in terms of equations they can be graphed and animated. In the standard model the neutron is a baryon with one up quark and two down quarks, but many physicists now reject the standard model and do not accept the claimed discovery of the Higgs boson. Many are scathingly critical of the machinations behind this Nobel Prize and the way in which standard physics has tried to ignore and misrepresent ECE physics. The result is a huge interest for ECE physics. The supersymmetric aspects of the standard model have entirely collapsed. The neutron, proton and electron should be all describable as solutions of the Beltrami equation, or Helmholtz equation, which is closely similar to the Schroedinger equation. The most general three dimensional solution of the Helmholtz equation was described in note 260(4), and consists of products of Bessel functions and spherical harmonics. The H atom has orbitals that are products of spherical harmonics and a radial function, giving s, p, d, ….. orbitals, these are solutions of the Schroedinger equation, which can be written as a Helmholtz type equation. The nucleus of an atom (protons and neutrons) is describable by a Schroedinger equation with a Wood Saxon potential or similar (see UFT226 ff.) I can write the Schreodinger equation a a Beltrami equation, and did this in UFT259 for the free particle momentum. So I will repeat the exercise for the H atom. The Beltrami description of the neutron can be developed as Schroedinger equations and Helmholtz equations. Any Beltrami equation can be written as a Schroedinger equation, and this was illustrated in UFT259 for the free particle momentum. Although these solutions look very complicated, Maxima, Mathematica and other packages can graph them and animate them as in UFT258 ff.

This was organized yesterday and is the second such conference this month, the other being organized in Austria. In fact these conferences take place (effectively) all the time on ECE theory, 24/7/365. This is well known from the Book of Scientometrics, which has itself become an item of central interest in avant garde physics. There is no longer a consensus on physics, there is ECE (probably the majority) and standard. They co exist as do classical and quantum physics, or classical and relativistic physics. B(3) and by implication ECE have been nominated several times since about 1993 for a Nobel Prize, probably a few times by Jean-Pierre Vigier, who worked with Louis de Broglie and Frederic Joliot-Curie, and was invited to become assistant to Albert Einstein at PIAS.

On 27/3/14 there were 2294 hits from 535 distinct visits, spiders from baidu, google, MSN, softlayer, yandex and yahoo. Auto1 195, Auto2 59, UFT88 130, Engineering Model 91, Book of Scientometrics 78, CEFE 58, Evans Equations 64 (English), numerous (Spanish), Englynion 36, “People’s University Myth or Perception?” 35, “Llais” 34, Collected Code 23, Sonnets 10, Second Book of Poetry 10 to date in March 2014. Institute of Physics University of Sao Paolo at Sao Carlos Brazil UFT146(Sp); University of British Columbia Canada UFT88; University of Chile UFT150(Sp); Jacobs International University Bremen UFT2; Institute of Philosophy Munich general; Physics Technical University Dresden UFT174; Library System University of Hamburg UFT12, UFT17; Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen UFT85; Cornell University UFT146; Physics Ohio University UFT247; Stanford Linear Accelerator UFT29; Parliament of Galicia F5(Sp); Astrophysics University of Helsinki UFT239; University of Poitiers general; Indian Statistical Institute Calcutta general; Public Education Secretariat Government of Mexico F3(Sp); Public Schools of the Tarrytowns New York UFT228; Pakistan Education and Research Network UFT166; Romanian National Institute of Materials Science UFT18; Conference organized in the Russian Federation on ECE Theory,participants included the following carriers and cities: Bashtel, Samara, Saratov, Corbina, Obit, Relan, Sura, Tomsk, Vologda and others; British Library general. Intense interest all sectors, Updated usage file attached for March 2014.

Many thanks, I agree it would be worth doing an extensive literature search on the experimental results of the deep inelastic electron proton scattering experiments that are claimed to produce quark structure. As you know Helmholtz can be rewritten as Schroedinger and that will give orbital type solutions for the proton. Inside the proton there would be areas of high probability of proton wavefunction. Wood Saxon gives a structure to the nucleus as you know. The same type of wave equations are used over and over again as pointed out by Gareth Evans. In fact all wave equations can be shown as in ECE to come from geometry as you know.

In a message dated 28/03/2014 19:09:12 GMT Standard Time, writes:

This is a good starting point for further investigations. The major problem probably will be to determine the mass of the electron and proton selfconsistently by theory.

You mentioned neutron scattering experiments to determine the internal structure of the proton. It would be interesting what has been found:
– Is there a shell structure with maxima at certain radii?
– Is there an agular variation of proton density?

Accidentally I just read about this in a book lf LaViolette who mentioned such experiments (in holiday I have time to read books :-). The book is about antigravity, he has developed a model with “virtual charges” which perhaps can be identified with the ECE geometric charge density. He additionally assumes a charge-gravity equivalent which can be amplified by certain forms of the virtual charge density. This reminds me to the resonance coupling between electromagnetism and gravitation we discussed in earlier papers. LaViolette has been invited by Amoroso to Vigier 9.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. März 2014 um 14:36 geschrieben:

Thank again, I always found it very difficult to believe in elementary particle theory. The Barbarians All Blacks game of 1973 is on youtube, complete, and some of the Llanelli All Blacks game,when Llanelli won 9 3. The most staggering defeat ever inflicted was by Pontardawe Grammar School against Llandyfri College, I think it was 106 nil. The All Blacks played illegally most of the time, scraping, kicking an punching until one Murdoch was sent home from the tour. The referee at Llanelli was very weak, he should have sent off Murdoch straight away, but by the time the Barbarians game came around New Zealand cleaned up its act except for Grant Batty. He was picked up and tapped on the head by Tommy David. I know a few physicists who play like that.

Sent: 28/03/2014 13:08:10 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 260(4): ECE Theory of the Structure of the Electron and Proton

No Higgs boson, no quarks and the photon, with mass, joining the ranks of elementary particles. A big reshuffle in the pack following a heavy defeat for the Standard Model 15 (rugby jargon). There is no uncertainty when Wales are at their best!! Well done Myron.

Sent from Samsung Mobile
Subject: 260(4): ECE Theory of the Structure of the Electron and Proton

The attached note gives a first geometrical theory in terms of solutions of the Helmholtz equation. These can be found in a literature search based on googling “Helmholtz equation spherical harmonics”. The electron can be described by a solution for the tetrad based on the Bessel functions multiplied by the spherical harmonics, or by a multipole expansion of the tetrad, eq. (37), treating the zero’ th order multipole, a perfect sphere as observed experimentally after a recent ten year experiment at Imperial College London. The proton can be described through the zonal, sectorial and tesseral solutions of the spherical harmonics. Colour graphics of these solutions can be found in the above google reference in two or three websites. Areas of high potential would be the “quarks” of the standard model. However deep inelastic electron proton scatterng data must be fitted by these new Helmholtz equation solutions. In the opinion of ECE physicists, quarks do not exist, they are merely produced by meaningless curve fitting. With so many loose parameters in the standard model (over a hundred adjustables in some supersymmetry theories) anything could be called a quark. This is not even natural philosophy. The supersymmetric aspects of the standard model have collapsed completely following negative experimental results at Imperial and CERN. The Higgs boson is rejected by ECE physicists.

Thank again, I always found it very difficult to believe in elementary particle theory. The Barbarians All Blacks game of 1973 is on youtube, complete, and some of the Llanelli All Blacks game,when Llanelli won 9 3. The most staggering defeat ever inflicted was by Pontardawe Grammar School against Llandyfri College, I think it was 106 nil. The All Blacks played illegally most of the time, scraping, kicking an punching until one Murdoch was sent home from the tour. The referee at Llanelli was very weak, he should have sent off Murdoch straight away, but by the time the Barbarians game came around New Zealand cleaned up its act except for Grant Batty. He was picked up and tapped on the head by Tommy David. I know a few physicists who play like that.

Sent: 28/03/2014 13:08:10 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 260(4): ECE Theory of the Structure of the Electron and Proton

No Higgs boson, no quarks and the photon, with mass, joining the ranks of elementary particles. A big reshuffle in the pack following a heavy defeat for the Standard Model 15 (rugby jargon). There is no uncertainty when Wales are at their best!! Well done Myron.

Sent from Samsung Mobile
Subject: 260(4): ECE Theory of the Structure of the Electron and Proton

The attached note gives a first geometrical theory in terms of solutions of the Helmholtz equation. These can be found in a literature search based on googling “Helmholtz equation spherical harmonics”. The electron can be described by a solution for the tetrad based on the Bessel functions multiplied by the spherical harmonics, or by a multipole expansion of the tetrad, eq. (37), treating the zero’ th order multipole, a perfect sphere as observed experimentally after a recent ten year experiment at Imperial College London. The proton can be described through the zonal, sectorial and tesseral solutions of the spherical harmonics. Colour graphics of these solutions can be found in the above google reference in two or three websites. Areas of high potential would be the “quarks” of the standard model. However deep inelastic electron proton scatterng data must be fitted by these new Helmholtz equation solutions. In the opinion of ECE physicists, quarks do not exist, they are merely produced by meaningless curve fitting. With so many loose parameters in the standard model (over a hundred adjustables in some supersymmetry theories) anything could be called a quark. This is not even natural philosophy. The supersymmetric aspects of the standard model have collapsed completely following negative experimental results at Imperial and CERN. The Higgs boson is rejected by ECE physicists.

Many thanks to Dr. Gareth Evans, who worked in our EDCL group on multipole moments of molecules as in OO10 for example, where I reported the discovery of the hexadecapole moment of oxygen by far infra red collision induced absorption. The original paper in Faraday II is hyperlinked to OO10. In a first geometrical theory of the structure of the electron and proton I used solutions of fthe Helmholtz equation which apply in fluid dynamics, aerodynamics, cosmology, electrodynamics, telegraph theory, give the Schroedinger and Klein Gordon equations, the Yukawa theory, are used in molecular dynamics, and now in elementary particle theory, all based on Cartan geometry, which itself is a solution of the Helmholtz equation via the Beltrami equation.

Sent: 28/03/2014 10:32:08 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: New Directions: Internal Structure of the Electron and Proton

Yes, and what ECE theory shows is that nature replicates itself. A new consistency has emerged – as expected from a unified theory. The concepts are simpler, the assumptions fewer and the insights deeper. Physics is given a new structure from subatomic to cosmological levels. Your approach in developing this has been methodical and meticulous. Art at its precise best. The facts are established and the garbage can be discarded. What an achievement!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile
Subject: New Directions: Internal Structure of the Electron and Proton

Recent work has shown that supersymmetry theory of the standard model has been refuted almost completely. An example of this is that the electron dipole moment has not been found after a ten year experiment at Imperial College (which often studies ECE theory as the scientometrics show clearly). The electron appears to have no internal structure in the standard model, but the proton is said to be a hadron that is made up of three valence quarks, two up quarks and one down quark. There are multiple problems with the quark gluon model, for example approximate symmetry and renormalization in QCD. An entirely new theory is needed of the electron and proton structure. ECE can approach this with Cartan geometry, because electric charge current density has a geometrical structure. The actual data used for the internal structure of the proton are deep inelastic electron proton scattering. ECE has refuted the Higgs mechanism and standard particle theory. The Book of Scientometrics has been meticulously gathered over a decade and shows that there is no longer any consensus in physics, the standard model and ECE are equally studied. Geometrical equations can be set up for the internal structures of the electron and proton. They may well turn out to be Beltrami equations, giving Helmholtz wave equations. Additionally the tetrad postulate can be applied to the internal structure, giving a relativistic description in terms of the generally covariant fermion equation of ECE theory. The entities currently thought of as quarks may well be solutions of these wave equations. Different solutions give different particle structures. There are many intricate solutions of the Helmholtz wave equation, so the internal structure of an elementary particle is intricate if governed by a Belrami equation or Helmholtz or fermion equation. Some solutions are animated by Horst Eckardt in UFT258. Supersymmetry and Higgs theory has been abandoned by ECE physicists, and there are now two types of physics: standard and ECE. The latter is thought to be greatly superior because it is simple, based on well known geometry. Standard physics has essentially collapsed.

The attached note gives a first geometrical theory in terms of solutions of the Helmholtz equation. These can be found in a literature search based on googling “Helmholtz equation spherical harmonics”. The electron can be described by a solution for the tetrad based on the Bessel functions multiplied by the spherical harmonics, or by a multipole expansion of the tetrad, eq. (37), treating the zero’ th order multipole, a perfect sphere as observed experimentally after a recent ten year experiment at Imperial College London. The proton can be described through the zonal, sectorial and tesseral solutions of the spherical harmonics. Colour graphics of these solutions can be found in the above google reference in two or three websites. Areas of high potential would be the “quarks” of the standard model. However deep inelastic electron proton scatterng data must be fitted by these new Helmholtz equation solutions. In the opinion of ECE physicists, quarks do not exist, they are merely produced by meaningless curve fitting. With so many loose parameters in the standard model (over a hundred adjustables in some supersymmetry theories) anything could be called a quark. This is not even natural philosophy. The supersymmetric aspects of the standard model have collapsed completely following negative experimental results at Imperial and CERN. The Higgs boson is rejected by ECE physicists.

a260thpapernotes4.pdf