Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

Many thanks to co author Doug Lindstrom, the literature search is often forgotten but is a key aspect of all genuine research.

In a message dated 26/08/2013 17:23:29 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

A put in a few hours searching, and found nothing we didn’t know about already. I think my next step is to model the Coulomb field for the Ni-H structure, as in Rossi’s device, so that is available for a quantum model. The quantum model should give the probability of transmutation, and the new scattering theory may give a idea of the energy available for heating the solid material. Perhaps the two can be merged, with the scattering theory giving before and after states, and the quantum model and connection between the two.

Doug

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Horst Eckardt wrote:

A quick googling showed that many alloys containing Ni and H have been studied. It seems to be more difficult to find a results for a pure NiH structure, although this is a standard material for batteries (or NiMeH with any metal Me). you should look for LAPW calculations and NiH.
Horst

Very interesting!

In a message dated 26/08/2013 19:32:37 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Doug, do you need the value of electronic charge density at the atomic core of Ni and H? Such data should be available from atomic structure calculations. I also have an old program that could compute this. I guess that the H atom in the solid is significantly negatively ionized so this value has to be increased.

Horst

Am 26.08.2013 18:23, schrieb Doug Lindstrom:

A put in a few hours searching, and found nothing we didn’t know about already. I think my next step is to model the Coulomb field for the Ni-H structure, as in Rossi’s device, so that is available for a quantum model. The quantum model should give the probability of transmutation, and the new scattering theory may give a idea of the energy available for heating the solid material. Perhaps the two can be merged, with the scattering theory giving before and after states, and the quantum model and connection between the two.

Doug

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Horst Eckardt <horsteck> wrote:

A quick googling showed that many alloys containing Ni and H have been studied. It seems to be more difficult to find a results for a pure NiH structure, although this is a standard material for batteries (or NiMeH with any metal Me). you should look for LAPW calculations and NiH.
Horst

I would say that the standard assumption that x3 is zero is good to start with, and the rest of this note seems OK, but if omega is 2 omega3 the energy E disappears from eq. (7). What is actually measured in LEP and heavy hadron colliders, as you know, are energy peaks in giga electron volts or higher, so my reasoning was to find an expression for energy as in eq. (16). Omega3 is the angular frequency of the photons produced in EP annihilation, and I assume that that is known experimentally. As you know a lot of elementary particles are also produced, so this theory kept things to the simplest possible. It can also be used for LENR of course.

In a message dated 26/08/2013 16:46:37 GMT Daylight Time writes:

Concerning the determination of E4, which is E in eqs.(16/17), we can assume that the quantities omega1, omega2 are known. omega3 has also to be assumed to be measured. For x3 we can assume vanishing photon mass:

x3 = 0.

Then the quantities E and m4 remain unknown. What we can safely calculate is

E^2 – m4^2 c^4

because we do not know the mass of the resulting particle.
Does it make sense to assume

omega = 2 omega3 ?

That means no energy is measured, but a momentum p4 remains there (in the case of 90 degree scattering). Will check this by computer.

Horst

There were 2200 hits from 518 distinct visits, 31.4% spiders from baidu, google and MSN. Auto1 160, Auto2 46, CEFE 32, Englynion 16. Siemens Company “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation”; Heinrich Heine University of Duesseldorf general; University of Duisburg Essen general; University of Duisburg general; Aquaculture Sub secretariat Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Ecuador UFT177(Sp); Cornell University UFT55; Physics Georgia Institute of Technology UFT41; Yale University UFT214; Tezpur University India UFT41; Mexican National Polytechnic Institute Felker 3 (Sp); Academ Organization Russian Federation general; Intense interest all sectors. Updated usage file attached for August 2013.

Agreed with this, I just sent over a note developing the theory. This can now be applied to the particle zoo. This assumes that the data gathered at CERN (LEP and heavy hadron collider) and other particle accelerators are reproducible and repeatable. I realize that there are many aspects to elementary particle theory such as spin and so on, and UFT247 is meant as a first theory. Note 247(6) results in an Einstein energy equation, which is a limit of the ECE wave equation as you know. This theory can now be applied directly to LENR to give an expression for the LENR energy / momentum.

In a message dated 26/08/2013 09:18:46 GMT Daylight Time:

I think we should find an expression for the dissipated energy E by extending eq. (2) and and by requiring

m c^2 = hbar omega_0

i.e.

x = omega_0

in the equation for x. It will be interesting to see which sign and size E has for electron positron annihilation.

Horst

Many thanks to co author Horst Eckardt!

In a message dated 25/08/2013 19:15:32 GMT Daylight Time,

This is another milestone in the new interpretation of elementary particle processes.

It seems that in eq. 21 the sign of 2x^2 should be negative.

Horst

Am 25.08.2013 09:43, schrieb EMyrone

This note considers the basics of experiments in particle physics such as LEP or the heavy hadron collider, electron positron annihilation. It is shown that on order for special relativity and quantum mechanics to be inter-consistent the collision must be regarded as inelastic, and described by Eq. (24) rather than eq. (1). All relativistic particle scattering must be inelastic, and not elastic. Remarkably, Compton scattering with a massless photon is the only elastic scattering theory that appears to work, and even that is an illusion. LENR theory is a theory of inelastic scattering, and so the methods of this note and notes 247 in general, can be used to forge both a new LENR theory and a new particle scattering theory. So the data produced by CERN may be reinterpreted according to a correct and much simpler theory. In my own opinion the vast expense of LEP and the heavy hadron collider can never be justified, but at least some good use may be made of the data they produce. The Higgs theory is complete nonsense as is well accepted by the great majority of scientists, (we know this from feedback to this world famous site), so we need a new ECE type theory. This can now be the subject of a series of new UFT papers, beginning with UFT247 by Horst Eckardt, Doug Lindstrom and myself.

There were 2291 hits from 535 distinct visits, 31.2% spiders from baidu, google, MSN and Softlayer. Auto1 165, Auto2 44, CEFE 29, Englynion 16, Autoarchive2 12, autoarchive1 12. Cornell University UFT213; Harvard University general; Monroe Community College Rochester New York State general; Greek Research and Technology Network Athens UFT166; Tel Aviv University Israel ECE Theory of Chemical Bonding. School of Graduate Studies University of Wales Cardiff Injustices in Academia. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for August 2013.

This note considers the basics of experiments in particle physics such as LEP or the heavy hadron collider, electron positron annihilation. It is shown that on order for special relativity and quantum mechanics to be inter-consistent the collision must be regarded as inelastic, and described by Eq. (24) rather than eq. (1). All relativistic particle scattering must be inelastic, and not elastic. Remarkably, Compton scattering with a massless photon is the only elastic scattering theory that appears to work, and even that is an illusion. LENR theory is a theory of inelastic scattering, and so the methods of this note and notes 247 in general, can be used to forge both a new LENR theory and a new particle scattering theory. So the data produced by CERN may be reinterpreted according to a correct and much simpler theory. In my own opinion the vast expense of LEP and the heavy hadron collider can never be justified, but at least some good use may be made of the data they produce. The Higgs theory is complete nonsense as is well accepted by the great majority of scientists, (we know this from feedback to this world famous site), so we need a new ECE type theory. This can now be the subject of a series of new UFT papers, beginning with UFT247 by Horst Eckardt, Doug Lindstrom and myself.

a247thpapernotes5.pdf

There were 2406 hits from 539 distinct visits, 1.190 gigabytes downloaded by the United States National Archives, 55.1% spiders mainly from baidu, google, MSN, Softlayer, wotbox, yandex and solomono. Auto1 151, Auto2 42, CEFE 28, Englynion 19. Ministry of Transport, Information Technologies and Communications of the Republic of Bulgaria UFT5; Ruhr University Bochum Short history of Optical NMR; Department of Physics University of Illinois Urbana Champaign UFT43, UFT107; University of Poitiers general; United States National Archives second part of extensive site download 23rd and 24th August 2013; Silesian Data Center Poland general; Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached.

To North Carolina Legislature

Further to me recent e mail, I point out that the attached severe international criticism of The University of North Carolina Charlotte has been resonating around the world for some time now, permanently damaging the reputation of those responsible , as in the UNCC Saga 1 – 4 on www.aias.us. The worst aspect of the physics department was its complete intellectual dishonesty in contriving false charges which were rejected with total contempt by the entire international community. There has also been hate mail from Charlotte, so the overall impression being given is of a Legislature unable to control its own University, I think that this hate mail comes from a staff member inside UNCC. There should be a Congressional Inquiry into all these happenings. The physics department also appointed me from Cornell for the discovery of B(3), in open competition, and buckled to unethical pressure from two academics in Britain, A. D. Buckingham and L. D. Barron, whose theory has been long forgotten while B(3) theory goes from strength to strength. I recently received a message of support from staff and students inside UNCC itself, so a few individuals gave it a bad name.

Myron Evans

Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List Pensioner, D. Sc., Ph. D., B. Sc. (Wales)
www.aias.us

auncccriticisms.pdf