Archive for October, 2014

Relativistic 3D Theory

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

Agreed on this. The 3D theory can be made relativistic by using the metric with spherical polar coordinates, then deriving the Thomas precession in 3D. I will have a look at this next. It should also be possible to derive light deflection by 3D theory, following the methods used earlier this year in x theory.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/10/2014 09:28:13 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 276(2): Simplest Explanation for Orbit Precession

We obtained the explicit form of x (dependent on parameters M, alpha, etc) from relativistic calculations earlier. Is there a way to bring both derivations together? For example that relativistic effects produce 3D orbits?

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. Oktober 2014 um 10:17 geschrieben:

This is Eq. (14), in which the experimentally observed orbit precession is explained by L / L sub Z in three dimensional orbit theory. Here L is the magnitude of the total angular momentum and L sub Z is its Z component. So all orbits are three dimensional QED. In the solar system and elsewhere they give the illusion of being two dimensional, but the precisely observed precession of the perihelion means that they cannot be explained by two dimensional theory. Equation (14) is derived in two ways, with a Maclaurin expansion method and with a Taylor expansion method due to Horst Eckardt. Both methods give the same result. This is another major breakthrough in orbit theory made by ECE theory and AIAS. It shows that the incorrect Einstein method is not needed at all. Precession can be described classically by use of the spherical polar coordinates in orbit theory instead of the four hundred year old method based on the plane polar coordinate s.

Precession and 3D Orbit Theory

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

Many thanks again to Gareth Evans, who is always appreciative of new and original results. His honours and awards have just been posted in a following message.

Sent: 28/10/2014 08:16:00 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Derivation by Horst of x ~ L / L sub Z

Fantastic result again. Well done to both of you!!

Watched a programme on TV last night about Dylan Thomas (100 years after his birth). His genius lives on and grows – just as yours will.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

276(2): Simplest Explanation for Orbit Precession

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

This is Eq. (14), in which the experimentally observed orbit precession is explained by L / L sub Z in three dimensional orbit theory. Here L is the magnitude of the total angular momentum and L sub Z is its Z component. So all orbits are three dimensional QED. In the solar system and elsewhere they give the illusion of being two dimensional, but the precisely observed precession of the perihelion means that they cannot be explained by two dimensional theory. Equation (14) is derived in two ways, with a Maclaurin expansion method and with a Taylor expansion method due to Horst Eckardt. Both methods give the same result. This is another major breakthrough in orbit theory made by ECE theory and AIAS. It shows that the incorrect Einstein method is not needed at all. Precession can be described classically by use of the spherical polar coordinates in orbit theory instead of the four hundred year old method based on the plane polar coordinates.

a276thpapernotes2.pdf

***SPAM*** Nobel Peace Prize of 1977 to Amnesty International

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

Spam detection software, running on the system “just109.justhost.com”, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn’t spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.

Content preview: This was awarded to Amnesty International in 1977. I am glad
to have worked for Amnesty International from 1978 to 1983 during the dictatorships
in Argentina and Chile. My duties were to write letters to try to get political prisoners freed. Thousands were murdered in Argentina and Chile as is well
known. The worst offender by far at that time was Iran. Shortly after I founded
the European Molecular Liquids Group (EMLG) in 1980 the Director of the Physics
Institute in Katowice, Edward Kluk, was denounced by his own academic colleagues to the KGB for trying to join EMLG. The last time I saw him he was very tense and nervous, and knew what was coming. George Chantry and I protested strongly in “The Times” of London, and he was released. He emigrated to the United States. Mansel Davies and I worked for freedom in the dangerous era of the post Stalinist thaw with the great physicist Stanislaw Kielich. The latter accepted B(3) immediately, along with the great Jean-Pierre Vigier and many others. This is all described in Autobiography Volume Two above my coat of
arms on _www.aias.us_ (http://www.aias.us) and in the historical source documents
section of the site. Amnesty International also investigated my severe mistreatment at the EDCL in Aberystwyth. This chronic abuse and violations of human rights probably resulted in physical damage which manifested itself in the form of uveitis, and later on catalysed serious illness, major severe depression, from which I almost died. The people responsible for that are identified in Autobiography Volume Two. So the abuses were investigated internationally at the time. Attached are descriptions of recognitions of my work during that era and later, and also of my EDCL group. Sweeping and urgent reform of the Welsh tertiary education system is needed so that all staff and students are fluent in Welsh, bringing it in to line with the secondary education system which has many excellent Welsh language schools. Emergency efforts are needed to prevent the Welsh language from becoming […]

Content analysis details: (7.7 points, 6.0 required)

pts rule name description
—-

Derivation by Horst of x ~ L / L sub Z

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

This is an excellent result from Horst using computer algebra and the Taylor series approximation of Eq. (10). In this approximation the precession factor x is L / L sub Z. So precessions are due to a three dimensional orbit, a result of great importance. From experimental data:

x = L / L sub Z = 1 + 3MG / (alpha c squared)

To be rigorously self consistent a relativistic three dimensional orbit theory is needed, and after writing up this result by Horst in Note 276(2) I will proceed to a relativistic 3D orbit theory. The obsolete and geometrically incorrect Einstein theory is nowhere needed to produce orbit precession. It can be produced on the non relativistic level simply by using the spherical polar coordinates for the kinetic energy.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 27/10/2014 15:13:45 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 276(1): A Simple Explanation of Orbital Precession with 3D theory

I think the situation of precession has to be considered in somewhat more detail because x is a constant but in eq.(10) the variable phi appears. We can make a taylor expansion for a full orbit phi=2 pi:

Here we have in linear approximation for a small phi:

tan (phi + 2 pi) ~ phi.

Then we insert this into the Taylor expansion of the tan^-1 function:

Inserting this into (10), the factor phi cancels out and we obtain directly

x ~ L/Lz

for x~1. In this range the linear approximation is valid.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. Oktober 2014 um 15:32 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple explanation of orbital precession with 3D theory on the non relativistic level. The precession constant is given in Eq. (10). A more accurate relativistic theory is needed to explain why x is 3MG / (alpha c squared). That is adequately explained by the Thomas precession theory of previous papers. So orbital precession is due to a slight difference between L and L sub Z. This means that all orbits are three dimensional, because all orbits precess, QED.

Daily Report Sunday 26/10/14

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

There were 2,790 hits from 488 distinct visits, main spiders from google, MSN, baidu and yahoo. UFT145 645, F3(Sp) 493, Auto1 381, Auto2 106, Book of Scientometrics 287, UFT88 78, ECE Engineering Model 74, Englynion 79, Llais 55, CEFE 53, UFT273 46, Evans Equations 54 numerous Spanish, Auto Sonnets 12, Principles of ECE 12 to date in October 2014. Two complete site downloads from private sites in Germany; Denver University Colorado Essay 7, Autobiography Volume One; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign publications; Texas A and M University UFT166; Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for October 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: October 2014 – URL
Generated 27-Oct-2014 12:00 EDT

FOR POSTING: UFT275 Sections 1 and 2

Tuesday, October 28th, 2014

Many thanks again!

276(1): A Simple Explanation of Orbital Precession with 3D theory

Monday, October 27th, 2014

This note gives a simple explanation of orbital precession with 3D theory on the non relativistic level. The precession constant is given in Eq. (10). A more accurate relativistic theory is needed to explain why x is 3MG / (alpha c squared). That is adequately explained by the Thomas precession theory of previous papers. So orbital precession is due to a slight difference between L and L sub Z. This means that all orbits are three dimensional, because all orbits precess, QED.

a276thpapernotes1.pdf

Daily Report Saturday 25/10/14

Monday, October 27th, 2014

There were 1,547 hits from 432 distinct visits or reading sessions, main spiders from google, yandex and yahoo. UFT145 663, F3(Sp) 478, Auto1 372, Auto2 101, Book of Scientometrics 276, UFT88 75, Engineering Model 71, Englynion 75, Llais 52, CEFE 46, UFT273 45, Evans Equations 51, numerous (Spanish), Principles of ECE 11, Autosonnets 11. Swiss Federal Institute Lausanne UFT116; Denver University Autobiography Volume One; University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign general; Portland State University Oregon UFT166; University of California Santa Cruz general; Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for October 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: October 2014 – URL
Generated 26-Oct-2014 12:00 EDT

FOR POSTING: UFT275 Sections 1 and 2

Sunday, October 26th, 2014

This is UFT275 Sections 1 and 2 with background notes, on the general theory and classification of three dimensional orbits for any force law of attraction.

a275thpaper.pdf

a275thpapernotes1.pdf

a275thpapernotes2.pdf

a275thpapernotes3.pdf

a275thpapernotes4.pdf

a275thpapernotes5.pdf

a275thpapernotes6.pdf