Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:50 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Check of Note 224(8)
| This is a check of note 224(8), resulting in the same result, eq. (9) of note 224(8). I suggest that a manual check can be made by others interested, it is just O level matrix algebra. The claim of GWS theory is eq. (2) of this note, and this bears no resemblence at all to the correct result, eq. (1) of this note. So GWS theory is rejected, and the Nobel Prize awarded for it is also rejected on the grounds of incorrect algebra. This means that the Higgs theory collapses completely, because both its U(1) and U(1)xSU(2) electroweak sectors are in ruins. The Higgs boson is a fantasy and a waste of everyone’s time. I think that AIAS should further criticise the GWS theory by trying to get to the root of the justification, if any, of the Weinberg angle. To me it appears to be completely arbitrary. There is no way in which GWS theory could have “predicted” anything. We at AIAS often find that the much vaunted standard model collapses under scholarly scrutiny. If anyone finds a different algebraic result to eq. (1) of this note, please let me know. Finally what about all those referees’ “reports” and all those citations? They all cited incorrect alegbra. At AIAS we referee our work rigorously, computer algebra being the best referee.
|
