Civil List Scientist.

Dear Mr. White and Mr. Westrenius,

Thank you so much for sending me the link to the announcement of

Professor Martin Rees’ public lecture at the University of Sydney in

November, prompting me to write to him:

http://sydney.edu.au/sydney_ideas/lectures/2012/professor_martin_rees.shtml

As you see below I received a prompt reply from him. But it is my

opinion that his short missive is a masterly executed piece of

Machiavellian sycophancy by which scientific truth has again been

buried alive.

Of course, we had no real expectation of anything otherwise, and so it

might seem that our recent correspondence with him, and Professor

Maudlin, seem, prima facie, as exercises in futility. Generally

speaking we already know from collective experience that communicating

scientific truths to professional scientists is indeed a waste of time

and effort, and so we do not usually bother. But sometimes we must and

in these recent two cases I feel that we have not really wasted out

time, because in doing so we have had to think hard, as true

scientists must, in order to convey the facts in the most simple terms

possible so that our scientific and other colleagues all around the

world can see for themselves the travesty of science that is being

perpetrated by the international community of professional scientists.

So this has produced great progress in our scientific work because we

have now been able to distil our irrefutable scientific facts into

very simple terms by means of reducing all the obfuscating

mathematical mumbo-jumbo that the professional scientists use to

conceal the true meaning of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity,

into a few simple physical principles and a few relatively simple

mathematical calculations that can be expounded in a few pages. Let us

review our latest accomplishments from these encounters.

First, we have demonstrated that the concept of the black hole is

inconsistent with General Relativity on account of the simple fact

that Einstein’s requirement that his Principle of Equivalence and his

Special Relativity must manifest in sufficiently small finite regions

of his gravitational field cannot be satisfied by a spacetime that by

mathematical construction contains no matter. Since Ric = 0 is a

spacetime that by mathematical construction contains no matter it is

therefore meaningless. Since the black hole was spawned from Hilbert’s

solution to Ric = 0 it too is consequently meaningless. Since the

black hole is a theoretical entity alleged to be derived from

Hilbert’s metric it too is meaningless. Since the theoretical

Michell-Laplace Dark Body of Newton’s theory of gravitation is

certainly not a black hole either, then it follows that there is no

theory that predicts the black hole at all. Not surprisingly nobody

has therefore ever found a black hole, despite the almost daily false

claims of their discovery all over the place, and so there is no

physical evidence of such a bizarre entity. Ergo, the relativistic

black hole does not exist except as a figment of an unscientific

imagination. And we have achieved this without making any calculations

at all, in a single page of writing that even a high school student

can follow.

Second, we have demonstrated that Einstein’s pseudo-tensor is a

meaningless concoction of mathematical symbols and hence that his

formulation of the usual conservation of energy and momentum is false,

and that the consequence of this is that his field equations violate

the usual conservation of energy and momentum, placing them in direct

conflict with experiment on a very deep level, thereby making General

Relativity invalid. We have done this with a few none too difficult

calculations, and some considerations on the conservation of energy

and momentum. The result is irrefutable. Thus, we have also proven

that the Big Bang cosmology is a fantasy, with its associated creatio

ex nihilo and expansion of the Universe; that Einstein’s gravitational

waves do not exist; and that “Einstein’s twisted nothingness” is

phantasmagorical.

With this concise exposition that we now have I will arrange for

journal publication of the material and subsequent posting to

electronic archives for easy and free internet access to all and

sundry.

We can also see clearly that many professional scientists are

frequently given to allowing their beliefs to predetermine the outcome

of their scientific inquiries (e.g. black holes, Big Bang,

gravitational waves) contrary to the scientific method, no less so

than Galileo’s adversaries who flatly refused to look through his

telescope to see the truth for themselves, and so society cannot

afford to allow professional scientists to dictate what is and what is

not. It is also a fact that vast sums of public money have been

squandered by professional scientists on meaningless ‘scientific

projects’ that have, ipso facto, brought nothing in return to the

benefit of society. I am reminded of Heaviside’s penetrating quip:

“It was once told as a good joke upon a mathematician that the poor

man went mad and mistook his symbols for realities; as M for the moon

and S for the sun.”

(Heaviside, O. Electromagnetic Theory, Vol. 1, p.133, 1893)

And so we will continue with our work and continue to challenge the

false dogmas that have now plunged astrophysical science and physics

generally into a state of intellectual decrepitude. After all,

professional scientists have no monopoly on scientific knowledge and

can be outclassed by non-professional scientists.

Kind regards,

Steve Crothers