Archive for December, 2013

255(3): Simple Vector Proof that Zero Torsion means Zero Curvature

Saturday, December 28th, 2013

This note uses the Cartan identity ion vector notation, Eq. (1) to show that zero torsion means zero curvature. This is known also from the commutator method of UFT139 and note 254(4). The first Bianchi identity of about 1900 was devised in an era when torsion was not known. In fact it is not an identity, it is a constraint that asserts that the tetrad vector must be perpendicular to the curvature vector. It neglects torsion and so neglects the gravitomagnetic field and the gravitational entity equivalent to the magnetic monopole in electromagnetism. The first Bianchi identity relies on the mid nineteenth century assumption of a symmetric Christoffel connection, which again means neglect of torsion (inferred in the nineteen twenties). The commutator method shows that both the first and second Bianchi identities are incorrect as well as very restrictive. The next note will deal with the second Bianchi identity, which I first generalized in UFT88, a paper that is being intensely studied at present in all the best universities. I can see this by feedback as usual. UFT88 refutes the Einstein theory very clearly and conclusively. I suggest that the new monograph with Douglas Lindstrom and Horst Eckardt be written entirely in terms of vectors. So the next step is to write the second Bianchi identity in terms of vectors and correct it for torsion. That will also correct the Einstein field equation. This is the post Einsteinain era in natural philosophy and the Einsteinian era has been refuted in many ways.

a255thpapernotes3.pdf

Erratum Eq. (24) of UFT254

Saturday, December 28th, 2013

It should be del dot omega sup a sub b dot q sup b on the left hand side.

255(3): Simple Proof that Zero Torsion Implies Zero Curvature

Friday, December 27th, 2013

Yes, R dot q = 0 is the space part of the old first Bianchi identity, the cyclic sum of Riemann tensors is zero. However each term of the cyclic sum is zero as proven in the note. This as also proven by the commutator method as in UFT139. In form notation the first Bianchi identity is

R ^ q = q ^ R = 0

as discussed in UFT88. In vector notation the first Bianchi identity is eq. (10) of the note. The correct Cartan identity is however eq. (13) of the note. The solution of eq. (10) gives eqs. (11) and (12), which in tensor notation are eqs, (20) and (21), which mean that the curvature is zero if the torsion is zero, QED.

In a message dated 27/12/2013 13:21:25 GMT Standard Time, dwlindstrom@gmail.com writes:

Myron:
For equation set(3), for a single polarization is

R . q = 0

and would have as a solution requirement besides R = 0,

Det(R ) = 0

for which
(R01 R23 – R02 R13 + R03^2) (R01 R23 – R02 R13 + R03 R12)=0

is the solution given by Mathematica.

Equation set (3) is a generalization of this to (for each a)

R sub 0 q sup 0 + R sub 1 q sup 1 +…=0

Have you come across such an extension of linear equation theory before. Determinants don’t sum very readily so I don’t think it is that simple.

Doug

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:43 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

This uses the vectorial Cartan and Evans identities to give a simple and clear proof that neglect of torsion implies zero curvature. This conclusion was arrived at previously in papers such as UFT139 using the commutator of covariant derivatives, but I know that many people do not go in to tensor analysis. A lot more go into vector analysis. This proof is absolutely simple, it takes just a few lines of vector analysis. It means the refutation of the entire Einsteinian theory of general relativity. This is why ECE is known as the post Einsteinian paradigm shift. This proof revolves around the obsolete first Bianchi identity, and I will proceed to considering the second Bianchi identity with torsion in view of the intensity with which UFT88 is currently being studied in all the best universities. There is no doubt at all that Einsteinian theory has been completely refuted by its neglect of torsion, and replaced by ECE theory. There is a complete split in physics between the post Einsteinian enlightenment and crass dogma. The pratty fringe turns this into abuse that they hurl at themselves without knowing anything about mathematics. I no longer even read articles based on the Einstein field equation. Of course I don’t expect the general public and non specialists here to understand the mathematics, but they can get the gist of what is happening, a power struggle in physics. Geometry should be the least political of subjects. This is why I have been on the receiving end of personal animosity, but that has died away now. The general public should know that there was no big bang, and there are no black holes. These concepts were based on incorrect geometry. Most people in the world could not care less about big bang or black holes, only about how to pay their huge electricity bills driven skywards by wind turbines in an economic catastrophe.

255(3): Simple Proof that Zero Torsion Implies Zero Curvature

Friday, December 27th, 2013

This uses the vectorial Cartan and Evans identities to give a simple and clear proof that neglect of torsion implies zero curvature. This conclusion was arrived at previously in papers such as UFT139 using the commutator of covariant derivatives, but I know that many people do not go in to tensor analysis. A lot more go into vector analysis. This proof is absolutely simple, it takes just a few lines of vector analysis. It means the refutation of the entire Einsteinian theory of general relativity. This is why ECE is known as the post Einsteinian paradigm shift. This proof revolves around the obsolete first Bianchi identity, and I will proceed to considering the second Bianchi identity with torsion in view of the intensity with which UFT88 is currently being studied in all the best universities. There is no doubt at all that Einsteinian theory has been completely refuted by its neglect of torsion, and replaced by ECE theory. There is a complete split in physics between the post Einsteinian enlightenment and crass dogma. The pratty fringe turns this into abuse that they hurl at themselves without knowing anything about mathematics. I no longer even read articles based on the Einstein field equation. Of course I don’t expect the general public and non specialists here to understand the mathematics, but they can get the gist of what is happening, a power struggle in physics. Geometry should be the least political of subjects. This is why I have been on the receiving end of personal animosity, but that has died away now. The general public should know that there was no big bang, and there are no black holes. These concepts were based on incorrect geometry. Most people in the world could not care less about big bang or black holes, only about how to pay their huge electricity bills driven skywards by wind turbines in an economic catastrophe.

a255thpapernotes3.pdf

Webalizer Feedback 26/12/13

Friday, December 27th, 2013

Auto1 135, Auto2 44, Book of Scientometrics 70, CEFE 41, Evans Equations 48 (English), numerous (Spanish), Englynion 8. Updated usage file attached for December 2013.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: December 2013 – URL
Generated 26-Dec-2013 05:30 EST

Heisenberg and Shchrodinger Joke for physicists

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

Heisenberg was a crazy, mixed up cat. If he knew exactly where he was he could be travelling and at any speed at all, and if he stopped he could be anywhere – at the other and of the universe, and into many other universes. So he probably ran over the cat and hid it in the boot, or trunk. After that time went backwards and the cat came alive again, devouring Heisenberg’s indeterminacy for breakfast, or was it still dinner time? After that Schroedinger went for a pub crawl with Coffey, who had travelled backwards in time to meet him, and both fell in to the grand canal.
.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 26/12/2013 17:25:32 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Heisenberg and Shchrodinger Joke for physicists

Hello Myron, I don’t know if you are familiar with this one. Heisenberg was out driving once and got stopped for speeding by a policeman. The policeman asked him. “Do you know what speed you were going at sir?” Heisenberg replied “No but I know exactly where I am” so the policeman told him “lYou were going at 108 mph sir.” Heisenberg was upset when he heard this and threw his arms up in the air saying ” Great, so now I am lost!”. Then along came Shrodinger in his car, also driving too fast. So the policeman stopped him and started lecturing him. As Schrodinger looked a bit suspicious, the policeman said “Have you got anything in the boot of your car? “. Shrodinger replied ” a cat” So the policeman on hearing this opened the boot immediately. The policeman, on opening the boot yelled. “Hey this cat is dead!”. Schrodinger angrily replied “Well he is now”. Vivienne ‘

R. S. Thomas on Quantum Mechanics

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

He wrote about the Heisenberg indeterminacy in the poem entitled “At it”, some lines of which are as follows:

……. But there will be
no judgement other then the true verdict
of his calculations, that abstruse
geometry that proceeds eternally
in the silence beyond right and wrong.

So he interpreted the indeterminacy as a collapse of reasoning, whereas we know from UFT175 and the work of AIAS Fellow Jose Croca that the obscurantism is simply incorrect. RST need not have worried, logic is as intact as ever. Rev. R. S. Thomas did not know much about quantum mechanics and categorized Schroedinger and Heisenberg together, whereas they were at loggerheads. Schroedinger never accepted indeterminacy. So this is the unfortunate effect of scientific obscurity at work, even in a man as capable as RST. Geometry is the least abstruse of thought, it is rigorous, and the Greeks equated geometry with beauty. Although I am an agnostic (Greek for “not knowing”) the poetry of RST resonates from very deeply within my mind because it is so concise and powerful and so utterly lacking in dogma. It is the lifelong struggle of the Anglican priest to come to terms with his belief and why it would allow such a savage world to exist. There is a lot of pratology, or major idiocy, written about RST, he was a very kind and very shy man, fiercely loyal to the Welsh language, and to the truth. Thsi comes out on the youtube feature on his Nobel Prize nominations, especially Mr Parry reading the deeply moving poem to his late wife. RST could not suffer pratology very kindly, especially as he got older, but he has a heart of gold.

Plans for New Work

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

As shown in note 255(2) the B(3) field is rigorously compatible with a unified field theory such as ECE that is based on geometry. So I will probably write a short chapter for the new monograph with Dr. Douglas Lindstrom and Dr. Horst Eckardt showing how ECE theory emerges from the inverse Faraday effect. The ECE theory always uses a manifestly covariant approach for the free field, while the obsolete physics always used an approach in which theere were only transverse states of polarization in free space. That led to massless photon theory and the U(1) sector symmetry for the attempts of the old physics to create a unified field. The Higgs boson has NOT been found, despite the award of a Nobel Prize to Higgs. It cannot exist because it is based on a completely refuted U(1) sector symmetry and a ridiculous number of adjustables, and it collapsed entirely in UFT225, shortly to be published in our journal. This is the deeply shocking thing about the state of current physics, it has never fallen so low in its entire history. Sometimes I feel as if I am watching circus clowns. The manifest covariance of ECE theory leads to the ECE engineering model, which does not use a U(1) sector symmetry and which does not use a Higgs mechanism. I also find it deeply shocking that the self serving elite of the old physics deliberately refuse to look at simple refutations. That means that they are not scientific at all. They have regressed to an era before 1600, i.e. before the enlightenment that began with Bacon. There may be a hundred monographs available refuting the U(1) sector in many different ways, yet a small clique of unscientific people are allowed to dominate the media and force through a pseudoscientific mysticism based on the sinking U(1) sieve. My entire Omnia Opera from 1992 onwards refutes the U(1) sector and with it the SU(2) sector of the old physics. Electrical engineers on the other hand have got to be practical people, and of course I do not deny the practical importance of ECE theory, it is used in Fortune Fifty industry all the time. They can’t buy enough of the Alex Hill devices. If any misguided individual refuses to believe this then make an appointment to see the plant in action. Known abusers or liars such as Peter Atkins and Waldyr Rodrigues (for that is what they are) are not welcome. The offensive Gerard ‘t Hooft is not welcome, Nobel Laureate or not. I have as many nominations as he had. The actual prize needs a lot of good luck. Put up or shut up, go and see the plant or otherwise behave scientifically as you have been trained to do. With the appalling collapse of the Higgs mechanism in UFT225 a new electroweak theory is needed based entirely on ECE concepts. A new theory of the strong nuclear force is needed based on ECE concepts. I feel that this is my main role, natural philosophy, the electrical engineers must build devices themselves. After all there are now 254 UFT papers available and many excellent papers and technical articles or overviews by colleagues such as Lar Felker, Horst Eckardt and Douglas Lindstrom. The Alex Hill devices are an industrial reality. There are 94 excellent essay broadcasts by Robert Cheshire of my essays, an d one by Horst Eckardt and two or three others by Robert Cheshire. All criticism of ECE has been completely swept aside by a massive wave of interest, which is here to stay. I am always here to help any genuine questioner, but they have to be up front and reveal their credentials and affiliation. No anonymity, no covert cynicism, no intellectual laziness. I expect questioners to be familiar with ECE theory already. Disturbed and criminal stalkers should be thrown completely out of science and of society by being totally ignored, like skunks at a wedding as Truman put it.

Webalizer Feedback for 25/12/13

Thursday, December 26th, 2013

Auto1 124, Auto2 40, Evans Equations 46 (English), numerous (Spanish), CEFE 40, Book of Scientometrics 67, Englynion 12 to date in December 2013. Updated usage file attached for December 2013.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: December 2013 – URL
Generated 25-Dec-2013 05:30 EST

The Meaning of Christmas

Wednesday, December 25th, 2013

It is a mass given on this day, only one simple mass or equivalent in various persuasions. It does not begin in August in Tesco. In the early church it was perfectly simple. This is the day of good will to all, even string theorists or ole Pete Atkins. So the meaning is as follows, Mathew 1.18.

A genedigaeth yr Iesu Grist oedd fel hyn. Wedi dyweddid Mair ei fam ef a^ Joseff, cyn eu dyfod hwy ynghyd, hi a gafwyd yn feichiog o’r Ysbryd Gla^n.

Christi autem generatio sic erat cum esset desponsata mater eius Maria Ioseph antequam convenirent inventa est in utero habens de Spiritu Sancto.

Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise. When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

The Chi rho iota page of the Book of Kells comes up by googling the words “Christi autem generatio”. It is an incredible masterpiece of art scribed partly on Iona. At the time there was no Tesco on Iona, there is still no Tesco on Iona. I remember the atmosphere of the Baptist chapel at Christmas. I like those memories and reading in three languages.