Many thanks to co author Horst Eckardt! Agreed with this and I think that the minus sign should also appear in Eq. (7), last two terms. So I will proceed to write this up today as UFT313. The original second Bianchi identity of 1902 is Eq. (8), which was used in the Einstein field equation. So the latter is completely incorrect geometrically. This was first shown in UFT88, and developed in very well studied papers such as UFT99, UFT109, UFT255 and UFT281, and in the equally well studied definitive proofs. UFT313 is much clearer and more elegant than UFT88, although the latter is by now a classic paper. It appears that Ricci derived Eq. (8) as early as 1880, and it was rediscovered in 1902. They both worked at the elite Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa. Recently UFT88 was studied from SNS Pisa.
To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/04/2015 14:58:33 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Final Form of Note 313(6)It seems that in eq. (4) there must be a negative sign in front of the brackets with the torsion terms. The rest is o.k.
Horst
EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. April 2015 um 14:15 geschrieben:
This is the final form of note 313(6) and the final format of the Jacobi Cartan Evans (JCE) identity is Eq, (7). It is seen that three terms are added to the 1902 second Bianchi identity, proving in another way that Einsteinian general relativity is irretrievably incorrect. The Jacobi identity produces the Cartan identity, First Evans identity and the JCE identity simultaneously. The choice of symmetric connection cannot be made, because this results in a null commutator, null curvature and null torsion, and no gravitation at all. So I will now proceed to writing up UFT313 in co authorship with Horst Eckardt.