## Archive for July, 2015

### 323(6): Calculation of the Earth’s Perihelion Precession

Friday, July 31st, 2015

In this first, hybrid type, theory, the Earth’s perihelion precession is calculated from the general Lorentz transform by assuming that its velocity is cap omega x r where cap omega is the gravitomagnetic field. The method gives the observed precession of 11.45 arcseconds a year with a velocity for the Lorentz transform of 6.7685 ten power five metres per second. In the non relativistic theory where there is no precession, the orbital velocity of the earth about the sun is about 3 x 10 power four metres per second, or thirty kilometres per second. A more accurate method is to use a lagrangian analysis to derive the generally relativistic Binet equation. That will be the subject of the next note.

a323rdpapernotes6.pdf

### Final check of Lorentz transform

Friday, July 31st, 2015

This is a final check with computer algebra by Horst Eckard of the basic mathematics of the general Lorentz boost. This is a very thorough check as usual by co author Horst Eckardt. I have used the results in Note 323(5) to explain the perihelion precession of planar orbits in terms of the general Lorentz transform of teh ECE2 gravitomagnetic field tensor. This is an exact theory based correctly on the presence of both torsion and curvature. Einstein is completely obsolete for leading scholars because he omitted torsion and because he fails completely in whirlpool galaxies (e.g. UFT281). ECE and ECE2 are de facto the new unified physics because their scholarship is so thorough, and because it is rigorously Baconian.

Sent: 30/07/2015 15:37:00 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Final check of Lorentz transform

I made the following check: In the general transformation matrix I set

beta_x = beta_y = 0.

Then I transformed J and A and compared the result with that of the
special transform in Z direction. After some manipulations it comes out
that both results are equal. That means, the apparently “missing” factor
gamma for J and A is not missing, it is only a different algebraic
expression for the same result.

Horst

323(3c).pdf

### Daily Report 29/7/15

Friday, July 31st, 2015

There were 3,422 files downloaded from 541 reading sessions during the day, main spiders baidu, google, MSN. Collection of 26 papers on the Evans / Morris effects 560 (est.); Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 333, Scientometrics 331, Autobiography volumes one and two 315, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers (UFT292 – 299) 227, F3(Sp) 224, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation thus refuting the Einsteinian general relativity 219, “The Principles of ECE Theory” (UFT281 – 288) 182, “The Evans Equations of Unified Field Theory” by Laurence Felker 155 (numerous in Spanish translation by Alex Hill, e.g. F3(Sp), the third chapter), Engineering Model 147, UFT88 133, UFT311 (first circuit paper) 114, UFT321 (second circuit paper) 82, UFT314 78, UFT318 76, UFT319 70, UFT317 64, CEFE 64, UFT316 63, UFT313 50, translation of “Llais” article by Dewi Lewis 46, UFT320 38, UFT322 26 to date in July 2015. University of Waterloo Canada UFT177, University of Fribourg Switzerland Device Development section; Czech Technical University in Prague UFT63, UFT75; Polytechnic University of Catalonia (Barcelona Tech) UFT136 (Sp); University of Poitiers general; British Indian Ocean Territory site download; Italian National Institute for Nuclear Research (INFN) Bologna, “Diplomatic Objection to ‘t Hooft” by AIAS Co President Gareth Evans; University of Oslo Norway UFT120; City of Nizhny Novgorod Equations Flowcharts; Prince of Songkla University Thailand ECE Theory of the Infinite Solenoid; Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru (National Library of Wales) genreal. Intense interst all sectors, updated usage file attached for July 2015.

# Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

### 323(5): Explanation of the Perihelion Precession with the Lorentz Transform

Thursday, July 30th, 2015

This note uses the general Lorentz transform of the acceleration due to gravity to deduce the general orbital equation in ECE2 theory, Eq. (6). This equation applies to three dimensional orbits in general, and to the whole of dynamics. In general it is highly non trivial to solve. The Lorentz transform is that of the generally covariant ECE2 field equations, which have a structure that is also Lorentz covariant. Eq. (6) is simplified to the case of planar orbits, giving the orbital equation (39). In this development the primed frame is considered to be the frame in which the axes are not moving, (the Newtonian or inertial frame), and the unprimed frame is the frame in which the axes are moving in general with a velocity v with respect to the unprimed frame. The plane polar coordinates are defined by the unprimed frame rotating in a circle with respect to the unprimed frame. So in this case v = omega x r and the gravitomagnetic field is – omega, where omega is the angular velocity perpendicular to the frame. In this case the Lorentz transform defines an effective potential eq. (59), giving the orbital equation (60) which could be integrated numerically. However, even in this simplified case, the numerical integration is a non trivial task, and it is easer to use the experimentally observed precessing orbit (63) defined by the x factor of previous work. At the perihelion this is related to the Lorentz factor by the simple Eq. (68). Therefore the precession of a planar orbit is due to the general Lorentz transform of the ECE2 field tensor of gravitomagnetism and general dynamics. This is a new kind of dynamics in which the concept of the Lorentz transform is applied to frames, and not particles.

a323rdpapernotes5.pdf

### A Boxer and a Fighter (Simon and Garfunkel)

Thursday, July 30th, 2015

You have to be a fighter to overturn dogma entrenched in concrete, it seems that all the disgraceful misrepresentation of ECE has been relegated to Ogof Ffynnon Ddu, fifty yards from my grandfather’s house, “Y Grithig”, opposite Craig y Nos Castle – the cave of the black outflow, the deepest in Britain. The boxer of the family is Ffloyd Havard of Craig Cefn Parc, superfeatherweight to lightweight British champion. I don’t approve of boxing unless there is a headguard and strict medical supervision, just a metaphor. Track athletics is a healthy sport, and very best wishes to the athlete Dick Evans with whom I used to train in Aberystwyth. Gareth still trains with him. I could outsprint Dick Evans but over any distance he would disappear on the far horizon, from 3,000 metres steeplechase to marathon.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/07/2015 18:21:07 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Evans / Morris Photograph

You have deflected their blows and forced them into a corner. The fighting tradition lives on!!

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Cc:
Subject: Evans / Morris Photograph

Many thanks, we also have www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com, which are now duplicate sites owned by Sean MacLachlan. The Evans Morris papers are UFT 278-281, UFT 289- 291, UFT300, 304, 306-310, and UFT312 in English and Spanish. As you know they overturn dogma in several ways, and provide a rigorous new test of quantum theory, all based on the important experimental effects of G. J. Evans adn T. Morris, all recorded on this blog and in the national digital archives, www.webarchive.org.uk. They completely refute the Hawking theory, in fact all of Hawking’s theories are refuted by ECE.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Thank you. The only references (web links) that should be added are to the AIAS website – where all the ECE theory papers are collected:

www.aias.us

and to the website of colleagues who are manufacturing and developing spacetime energy devices:

www.et3m.net

For the information of the editors of your journal, attachments to this message demonstrate some of the simple new observations with light referred to in the commentary.

Photo 1 shows focused sunlight shifted to red light by extra virgin olive oil. It is the chlorophyll in the olive oil that shifts all the components of the white light to the red – to the frequency at which photosynthesis takes place (at around 680nm).

Attachment 2 – reproduced with the kind permission of Robert Fosbury from his flickr website:

https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/bob_81667/6811951183/in/set-72157624831829718/

shows laser light at three different wavelengths shifted by chlorophyll in olive oil to this 680nm absorption. Plants must shift the frequency of light in this way to improve the efficiency of absorption and possibly to protect cells from uv ionising radiation (that is also shifted to the red).

This red shift during photosynthesis can be seen from space on a global scale:

http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/seeing-photosynthesis-from-space-nasa-scientists-use-satellites-to-measure-plant-health/#.VbitiMtwbqA

ECE theory explains these frequency shifts in a new way (papers 279, 280, 289,290, 300, 304, 306, 308, 309, 310 and 312 in the uft series of papers on the AIAS website). Light always undergoes a frequency shift when it interacts with matter. The chlorophyll shifts reported above, using the three lasers, are reproduced with the theory on the AIAS website.

This may offer a new explanation for the cosmological red shift that does not require relative motion and does not imply an expanding universe and big bang.

Photograph 2 shows ordinary white torch light shifted to red in the same way by the chlorophyll in olive oil.

These are changes in frequency right across the visible spectrum (from blue to red) . Similarly large shifts are observed in certain crystals.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

### UFT88 read at Saarland University

Thursday, July 30th, 2015

UFT88 is a classic paper by Horst Eckardt and myself which corrects the Einsteinian relativity by correcting the second Bianchi identity for torsion, and developing Einstein into ECE and now ECE2 unified field theories. UFT88 has been read intensively (about ten thousand times since publication) in all the best universities and institutes in the world, including Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, where Bianchi and Ricci were students and staff members. Recently it has been developed into the already well studied UFT313 – 320 and UFT322. Currently we are working on UFT323. These are papers of the ECE2 theory, and are already being read about six thousand times a year worldwide. These papers are based on non zero torsion and curvature. The Einstein theory was based only on curvature and is thoroughly obsolete. The University of the Saarland was founded in 1948 in a cooperation with the University of Nancy where I worked with Prof. Jean-Lois Rivail as post graduate on a French Government bursary (Autobiography, Volume Two). Currently Saarland is ranked 376 in the world by Webometrics and 401 by Times Higher Education. It has 18,100 students. Recently a short paper by AIAS Co President Gareth Evans has been accepted for publication at Harvard, which is top cat by some rankings. It is currently ranked number one in the world by Webometrics and Times. My own former University Cornell is ranked number five in the world by Webometrics, and my former University Oxford is often ranked one or two. It all depends on which rankings you use. It is a matter of the individual, not the place. In any case I am really an Aberystwyth man, and the EDCL evolved into the AIAS. Usually you can’t tell a Harvard man anything, so many congratulations to Gareth Evans, honorary Co President of Room 262 situated above Grendel’s Cave, in which the electron microscope was housed.

### Daily Report 28/7/15

Thursday, July 30th, 2015

There were 8,500 files downloaded from 361 distinct visits, main spiders baidu, google, MSN. The 26 Evans / Morris papers 580 (est), Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 326, Scientometrics 314, Autobiography 300, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 233, F3(Sp) 218, Evans Equations 131 (numerous Spanish), UFT88 126, Engineering Model 126, UFT311 110, UFT321 79, UFT318 73, UFT314 66, UFT319 64, UFT316 61, CEFE 60, UFT315 60, UFT317 59, UFT313 47, Llais 41, UFT320 37, UFT322 25. University of Paderborn AIAS staff, my page; University of the Saarland UFT88, Knology private site complete download; Sussex University “Generally Covariant Unified Field Theroy”, my page, “Injustices in Academia”, “People’s University – Myth or Perception?”, letter to “The Cambrian News”, UNCC Saga Part 1, U. S. Archives San Francisco “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation” (CEFE). Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for July 2015.

# Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

### Evans / Morris Photograph

Wednesday, July 29th, 2015

Many thanks, we also have www.upitec.org and www.atomicprecision.com, which are now duplicate sites owned by Sean MacLachlan. The Evans Morris papers are UFT 278-281, UFT 289- 291, UFT300, 304, 306-310, and UFT312 in English and Spanish. As you know they overturn dogma in several ways, and provide a rigorous new test of quantum theory, all based on the important experimental effects of G. J. Evans adn T. Morris, all recorded on this blog and in the national digital archives, www.webarchive.org.uk. They completely refute the Hawking theory, in fact all of Hawking’s theories are refuted by ECE.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

Thank you. The only references (web links) that should be added are to the AIAS website – where all the ECE theory papers are collected:

www.aias.us

and to the website of colleagues who are manufacturing and developing spacetime energy devices:

www.et3m.net

For the information of the editors of your journal, attachments to this message demonstrate some of the simple new observations with light referred to in the commentary.

Photo 1 shows focused sunlight shifted to red light by extra virgin olive oil. It is the chlorophyll in the olive oil that shifts all the components of the white light to the red – to the frequency at which photosynthesis takes place (at around 680nm).

Attachment 2 – reproduced with the kind permission of Robert Fosbury from his flickr website:

https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/bob_81667/6811951183/in/set-72157624831829718/

shows laser light at three different wavelengths shifted by chlorophyll in olive oil to this 680nm absorption. Plants must shift the frequency of light in this way to improve the efficiency of absorption and possibly to protect cells from uv ionising radiation (that is also shifted to the red).

This red shift during photosynthesis can be seen from space on a global scale:

http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/seeing-photosynthesis-from-space-nasa-scientists-use-satellites-to-measure-plant-health/#.VbitiMtwbqA

ECE theory explains these frequency shifts in a new way (papers 279, 280, 289,290, 300, 304, 306, 308, 309, 310 and 312 in the uft series of papers on the AIAS website). Light always undergoes a frequency shift when it interacts with matter. The chlorophyll shifts reported above, using the three lasers, are reproduced with the theory on the AIAS website.

This may offer a new explanation for the cosmological red shift that does not require relative motion and does not imply an expanding universe and big bang.

Photograph 2 shows ordinary white torch light shifted to red in the same way by the chlorophyll in olive oil.

These are changes in frequency right across the visible spectrum (from blue to red) . Similarly large shifts are observed in certain crystals.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

### Discussion of Note 323(4)

Wednesday, July 29th, 2015

This is a very useful check, I went through the protocol, and it shows that the correct general Lorentz transforms of the potential vector and charge density is:

J’ = J — gamma rho v + (gamma – 1) (J dot v^)v^
A’ = A – gamma phi v / c squared + (gamma – 1) (A dot v^)v^

These useful results can now be applied to gravitomagnetism and to the generalization of dynamics. Many thanks indeed to co author Horst Eckardt for this checking work using the computer augmented by hand calculations. My preliminary calculations today show that orbital precession can be described by the general Lorentz transformation of force, the factor x of x theory can be defined in terms of the spin connection vector.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 29/07/2015 12:36:18 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Discussion of Note 323(4)

Attached is the calculation with 4-vectors. They are called J4 and A4. On the first/second page the Transform in Z direction is performed:

J4 –> L * J4
A4 –> L * A4

The results are 4-vectors, column form, each line is a component. There is a commen factor gamma (I had to use capital gamma for internal reasons of Maxima).
On the second/third page the general transformation matrix Lambda and the expressions

J4 –> Lamba * J4
A4 –> Lambda * A4

are shown, again in 4-vector notation. Each line is an algebraic expression for the respective component. Components 1-3 contain the vectors J and A without a gamma factor.
(beta has been repaced by b for internal reasons).
There seems to be a principal difference between vector and tensor transformations. Please check this protocol in detail.

Horst

Am 29.07.2015 um 09:53 schrieb EMyrone:

I have been thinking about this myself. I recommend multiplying the general matrix (50) of note 323(3) with each column vector, A sup mu and J sup mu, using computer algebra, then translating the results into vector notation to see whether the gamma disappears or not. It is of course ultra important to sort out the fundamentals. It has been established that there is agreement between the Wikipedia site and Jackson for the general Lorentz transformation of fields, which becomes the general Lorentz transform of accelerations in the new theory I have in mind – creating a theory of general relativity out of the well known work of Coriolis in general dynamics. You have already checked by computer algebra that the matrix (50 of note 323(3) leads to the right expressions for the Lorentz transform of fields. So your computer coding is as usual, rigorously correct.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 28/07/2015 16:11:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Note 323(4): Double Check on the Lorentz Tarnsforms

This is for a Lorentz boost in Z direction. For an arbitrariy direction of velocity the problem from nore 323(3) remains. Either the general Lorentz matrix is erroneous, or the effect is that gamma disappears for J and A. For the F tensor the gamma in front of E and B is there. There seems to be a difference if a vector or a tensor is transformed, because of the similarity transformation for the tensor.

Horst

Am 28.07.2015 um 15:18 schrieb EMyrone:

This note gives the general Lorentz transform of charge current density and the potential four vector. The two basic errors in the Wikipedia article “Classical Electromagnetism and Special Relativity” are pointed out. The Lorentz covariance of the field equations is given in Eqs. (15) and (16). Note that ECE2 is a theory of general relativity which produces equations with the same structure as the Maxwell Heaviside field equations but in a space with both non zero torsion and non zero curvature. The concepts of torsion and curvature do not exist in MH. So I refer to the transformation of ECE2 as a pseudo Lorentz transform. It is a generally covariant transform that looks like a Lorentz transform. The gravitomagnetic field equations transform in the same way. By using these concepts the well known theory of G. G. Coriolis (1835) can be written as a theory of general relativity. Developments such as this will be the subject of the next notes for UFT323.

323(3c).pdf

### LETTER OF SUPPORT from Prof. Emeritus Alwyn can der Merwe

Wednesday, July 29th, 2015

Seconded!

In a message dated 29/07/2015 09:12:43 GMT Daylight Time, garethjohnevans@hotmail.co.uk writes:

Prof. Alwyn van der Merwe and Vigier et al are fully vindicated in the support they provided for Myron. Prof. Alwyn van der Merwe is a distinguished scientist in his own right – a man of vision who bravely stuck to his principles. This is a wonderful letter of support from a great man – a true gentleman..

Sent from Samsung Mobile