Indicators from the Scientometrics

There is an unprecedented mass of scientometrical data available which can be used to build up many different indicators of the impact of ECE theory. This has been built up every day, almost without a break, for eleven years, 30th April 2004 to 30th April 2015, and is a unique data bank. One of the most important is the quality indicator, which measures the quality of sustained visits from the best universities in the world. This is given in Section Two of the attached volume two. The quality indicator is built up by taking all the different universities in the Webometrics top twenty in the world and the THES top twenty in the world. These are listed at the start of Section Two. There are twenty nine different universities in the two lists. The quality indicator shows that staff and students from these twenty nine universities have been studying the www.aias.us website for eleven years. The great majority of visits from universities, institutes, polytechnics and similar are from the top two hundred in the world measured by Webometrics, THES or other rankings. Webometrics ranks over twenty thousand universities. Webometrics and scientometrics are two new sciences of the last fifteen years or so, making citation completely obsolete. Another important indicator is long term impact, measured by a number of sub indicators including distinct visits (reading sessions), files downloaded (hits), page views, gigabytes downloaded, number of countries and number of items read. These are reported every end of the month. The long term impact is summarized in Section One of the attached, back to May 2002. The ECE theory made a meteoric impact in 2003, when it first appeared, immediately debated the standard model, and has been sustained at a very high plateau ever since. The data bank is of such high quality statistically that it can be used to extrapolate the impact of ECE well in to the future with essentially complete confidence. The theory will outlast all of us here. All of this is summarized in UFT307 which will be published shortly as a softback:

M. W. Evans, “Collected Scientometrics” (Joint Venture with New Generation Publishing of London at £8.99, copyright M. W. Evans, Volume One).

A third important indicator is the number of UFT papers read every month. Since the theory began, all the papers, essays, books and indeed all three thousand items on www.aisa.us have been read each month. UFT307 contains a survey of Dec. 2014 proving this. A fourth important indicator is which items are read in which places, ans this is given every early morning. A fifth impotrant indicator is Google Scholar. All the UFT papers and books are in Google Scholar, both in English and Spanish. Finally a sixth important indicator is the use of Google keywords, initially selected to be as broad based as possible. As the keywords begin to match the title of a UFT paper more an more closely, the UFT paper will almost inevitably reach number one on the first page of google. This is true for all 312 UFT items in English and about 200 in Spanish, and also true for over a hundred essays in English and Spanish. The obsolete standard model does not have any of these indicators, and there is no university department in the world which has this kind of data bank available. The claims of the standard modellers are based on uncritical self citation. The only measure they have is citation of the standard model by standard modellers. So it is a club like any other. Jobs, promotions, prizes and so on are awarded to members of the club only. This is hardly new, just human nature, the very thing that my ancestral cousin Francis Bacon wanted to get rid of.

BookofScientometricsVolumeTwo.docx

Comments are closed.