Computer Checks of GWS Theory

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Author: metric345
Subject: Computer Checks of GWS Theory

Many thanks indeed for this check, and all the work put into it. It looks as if there is one sign different in one term between the hand calculations and the computer calculations for eq. (8) of note 224(8). It should be easy to find the sign slip and I will go through my hand calculations again tomorrow (page 2 of note 224(8)). The hand calculations on page 2 are just elementary matrix calculations. There is no way in which the result claimed by GWS electroweak theory is going to emerge. The covariant derivatives in eq. (5) of note 224(8) are defined in the same way as Ryder. His own definitions are put into his own eq. (3), and his own result does not emerge. Eq. (14) of note 224(8) is exactly the equation given by Ryder, and again his algebra is wrong using his own definitions. This has now been checked by Dr Horst Eckardt’s computer algebra. The Weinberg angle is introduced out of the blue in Ryder. I think that AIAS should keep criticising and probing this weak point of GWS, because a Nobel Prize seems to have been given for a mistake. Not for the first time in human history.

In a message dated 24/07/2012 15:07:36 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

This was a bit tricky due to the matrix-vector operations. The
variables Rb etc. stand for R bar etc.

Eq. %o15 is the final result for Eq. (8) of the note. The orders of
factors is not always correct because I did not implement operators or
covariant expressions. The tree terms of the last part of Eq.(8) are
there but partially with different signs.

Eq.(14) is %o22 or %o23. Here sigma has been set to zero for clarity.
Again the signs of the terms differ with (14). Can it be that the
definition of D sub mu Phi is incorrect? There is a sign difference to
the analogue definition (6).

Horst

View article…

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 26th, 2012 at 1:11 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.