I have never heard of Rick Delano, but COBE / FIRAS is certainly dubious. In my opinion all the experimentation that was used in the old Einstein era should come under the microscope as Crothers is doing here. The Einstein field equation is meaningless (e.g. UFT88) because it neglects torsion. Stephen Crothers has shown many times over that the methods of the old Einstein era are erroneous. I no longer read articles based on the old Einstein era because they would waste my time and that of AIAS. In my experience the old physics was and is intellectually dishonest, for example it has failed completely to answer UFT225. Stephen Crothers should be elected to a chair of theoretical physics in my opinion to compensate for the cynical destruction of his Ph. D. studies by dogmatists.
Mr. DeLano,
Please refrain from cluttering this communication with your garrulous interference. The two simple questions are for Mr. Tegmark since Mr. Sungenius failed to answer them. You have vehemently expressed yourself extensively previously. Let Max Tegmark speak for himself.
We all await your answers Mr. Tegmark. Or will you seek protection in silence instead of facing Professor Robitaille?
Stephen J. Crothers
(1) When you put a glass of water inside a microwave oven and turn it on does the water in the glass reflect the microwaves or does it absorb them?
(2) Is a powerful absorber of microwaves also a powerful emitter thereof?
Stephen J. Crothers