Archive for November, 2014

279(8): Comparison of Experiment and Theory

Saturday, November 29th, 2014

This note summarizes a scheme for comparison of experiment and theory using the linearized n photon monochromatic theory with conservation of energy and momentum. As shown yesterday by Horst Eckardt there are four possible solutions for the refracted frequency omega1 in terms of the incident frequency omega, and it is possible to produce refracted red shifts and blue shifts as observed experiemntally by Gareth Evans and Trevor Morris. In the first instance the refarctive index of olive oil can be used, n = 1.4665, to see if this is sufficient to produce red shifts. The angle theta3 appears to be unknown experimentally but it can be adjusted to try to produce a fit with data. I note that the frequencies in hertz sent over by Gareth are calculated from the wavelengths using the speed of light c as in Eq. (1). If this simple constant refractive index theory does not work then the complex refractive index must be used as described by Horst yesterday. The real and imaginary parts of the complex refractive index are given in Eqs. (10) and (11). The rigorous theory is given in Eqs. (4) and (5), using the Planck distribution. Can Maxima solve those equations? Probably not, a mainframe computer will probably be needed.

a279thpapernotes8.pdf

Comparison of Theory and Experiment

Saturday, November 29th, 2014

Congratulations in turn to Gareth Evans and Trevor Morris, who have produced all this work in private laboratories set up at their homes. Den Davis also kindly replicated a frequency shift in his laboratory, and further replications were mentioned at a conference attended by Gareth Evans in Cardiff. The shifts in the spectrum are given on the blog a few days ago. I will look up the exact experimental frequencies, and the n photon monochromatic theory can be used to try to reproduce the shifts theoretically. I think I will write up UFT279 as a four author paper after a final note on these red shifts: Horst Eckardt, Gareth Evans, Trevor Morris and myself. As usual Horst Eckardt used Maxima on a desk top to great effect. Back in the seventies and eighties in Room 262 that is what I used to do with the Elliott 4130 mainframe computer (Algol code on www.aias.us). Theory was always compared with our own experimental data, which were also obtained with the Elliott 4130. Later, molecular dynamics simulation was started on the CDC 7600 supercomputer and then on the IBM 3090 and 3084 supercomputers.

29/11/2014 07:31:43 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Discussion of 297(9) Computation

This is a good idea by Myron because the observations in olive oil (the massive shift of blue or green light to the red) highlights that these frequency shifts are not fluorescence (or any thing else we have come to know). We know from the spectra circulated last week that this shift is associated with the chlorophyll molecule (all of the shifted light ends up in a chlorophyll absorption). Even green laser light (and white light itself ) ends up in this absorption at 680nm. This is very important because most green light is not absorbed by plants (this is why plants are green). If you look at the spectrum for olive oil circulated last week, there are no absorption bands in the green spectral frequency region. So, this cannot be fluorescence, this is not green light being absorbed and causing some sort of excitation before being re- released at another (lower energy) frequency. This is purely and simply light undergoing a frequency shift (as Myron has now shown whenever light interacts with matter and in whatever phase – sold, liquid or gas). The shift of frequency may always end up in some existing absorption – as in the chlorophyll example or the formaldehyde experiment forwarded yesterday (where lots of shifts occur from the initial single excitation frequency to known vibrational absorptions).

You have done loads of wonderful new science Myron but this is the most significant. There might be no life on Earth without this frequency shift in Chlorophyll because photosynthesis would, at the very least, be less efficient (and perhaps not happening at all). This is a very finely tuned process that we now understand much better.

You have taken us as close to nature than anyone else before Myron. Absolutely brilliant.

Subject: Discussion of 297(9) Computation

One could use the observed omega and omega1 sent over by Gareth for chlorophyll, there were three lines all red shifted. Then the angle theta3 could be used as an input parameter. The photon mass varies for frequency as in the Compton effect calculations of photon mass.

nt: 28/11/2014 11:33:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Computatioon of Note 279(7) by Horst Eckardt

The equations for photon mass depend on omega, omega_1 and theta_3. In principle we know additionally the relation omega_1(omega, theta) which could be inserted here but this becomes extremely complicated even for Maxima. I will try a surface plot m(omega_1, theta) for a given omega_0. tomorrow.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. November 2014 um 10:41 geschrieben:

Many thanks again. Graphs of the way in which the photon mass behaves would be very interesting, when you have the time of course. It would also be possible to give an estimate of the mass. I will write up UFT279 as a four author paper after one final note on photon mass calculated from an n photon beam.

Sent: 28/11/2014 09:10:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Checking Note 279(7), Photon Mass Calculation

This is the calculation with the right mass expressions at the end.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. November 2014 um 08:30 geschrieben:

Many thanks again, the units of x in Eq. (10) are energy divided by h bar = inverse seconds so that is the correct factor to use in Eqs. (16) onwards. In Eqs. (14) and (15) the units are also correct, mc / h bar = kgm m / s /(kgm (m / s) squared seconds) = inverse metres, the unit of kappa. So your computations are again very interesting and correct, as long as the x is defined as (m c squared) / h bar. They give the photon mass from ordinary reflection and refraction. This means that the Higgs boson does not exist, no need any more for CERN, all one has to do is look at one’s reflection in a mirror. J. H. van Vleck was doing this when shaving early one morning, just as the sun was rising, at the Gordon Conference in 1976 at Holderness School, New Hampshire. He said “It’s awfully early isn’t it?”. I was a scruffy apparition who had just done my training on the American football pitch. From jet lag I had no idea what the time was.

Sent: 27/11/2014 16:08:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 279(7): Photon Mass from the Evans / Morris Effects

The definitions of x in eqs.(10) and (14,15) differ by a factor of c^2. Using

x = (m c / hbar) ^2

gives the result computer by computer. The last expression is that for the mass, both are quite complicated.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. November 2014 um 14:24 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

UFT88 Read at the Middle East Technical University Ankara

Saturday, November 29th, 2014

The Middle East Technical University was founded in 1956 and is ranked number 484 in the webometrics world rankings, with over 23,000 students. UFT88 has been read 120 times to date in November 2014 without any criticism. It has been read many thousands of times since it was written and is a classic and clear refutation of the Einstein field equation. It has been developed greatly in UFT88 to UFT255 and shows how torsion works itself in to the second Bianchi identity and changes it completely. Einstein based his incorrect field equation on the original second Bianchi identity without torsion. It is clear from the five definitive proofs that if torsion is zero, so is curvature, so torsion can never be zero. The dogmatists are either completely unaware of these developments, or if they are, aware of them still try to assert that torsion can be zero and curvature non zero. This assertion is refuted clearly and simply in the five definitive proofs on www.aias.us. most students are kept in the dark about torsion by dogmatic teaching, but from feedback it is clear that the students study www.aias.us and make themselves aware of the ECE theory. The great majority of physicists and chemists do not understand the mathematics of general relativity, and the general public cannot be expected to understand these mathematics at all. So there is no purpose in the media propaganda about black holes, big bang and all that. To scholars it is a complete waste of time. Over time, the broadcasting system of AIAS is just as influential as the BBC, and more competent.

Daily Report 27/11/14

Saturday, November 29th, 2014

There were 2,285 files downloaded (hits) from 411 reading sessions (distinct visits) during the day. Main spiders baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Auto1 725, Auto2 98, UFT145 617, F3(Sp) 383, UFT243 127, Book of Scientometrics 136, UFT88 120, Englynion 92, Evans Equations 52 numerous Spanish, Principles of ECE 15 to date in November 2014. Atomic Institute Technical University Vienna UFT228; Site of the President and Government of Brazil Planalto general; University of Alberta Canada UFT42; University of Waterloo UFT85; Institute of Nuclear Physics Technical University Darmstadt UFT2; University of Jena UFT170; French National Engineering School in Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Computer Science, Hydraulics and Telecommunications UFT113; Institute for Space Astrophysics Orsay UFT15; University of St. Etienne UFT43; Physics Department Poznan University Poland LCR Resonant; Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences UFT227; Physics Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey UFT88; University of Cambridge UFT114; University of Durham UFT43; Mathematics Queen Mary University of London UFT104. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: November 2014 – URL
Generated 28-Nov-2014 13:10 EST

Discussion of 297(9) Computation

Friday, November 28th, 2014

One could use the observed omega and omega1 sent over by Gareth for chlorophyll, there were three lines all red shifted. Then the angle theta3 could be used as an input parameter. The photon mass varies for frequency as in the Compton effect calculations of photon mass.

nt: 28/11/2014 11:33:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Computatioon of Note 279(7) by Horst Eckardt

The equations for photon mass depend on omega, omega_1 and theta_3. In principle we know additionally the relation omega_1(omega, theta) which could be inserted here but this becomes extremely complicated even for Maxima. I will try a surface plot m(omega_1, theta) for a given omega_0. tomorrow.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. November 2014 um 10:41 geschrieben:

Many thanks again. Graphs of the way in which the photon mass behaves would be very interesting, when you have the time of course. It would also be possible to give an estimate of the mass. I will write up UFT279 as a four author paper after one final note on photon mass calculated from an n photon beam.

Sent: 28/11/2014 09:10:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Checking Note 279(7), Photon Mass Calculation

This is the calculation with the right mass expressions at the end.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. November 2014 um 08:30 geschrieben:

Many thanks again, the units of x in Eq. (10) are energy divided by h bar = inverse seconds so that is the correct factor to use in Eqs. (16) onwards. In Eqs. (14) and (15) the units are also correct, mc / h bar = kgm m / s /(kgm (m / s) squared seconds) = inverse metres, the unit of kappa. So your computations are again very interesting and correct, as long as the x is defined as (m c squared) / h bar. They give the photon mass from ordinary reflection and refraction. This means that the Higgs boson does not exist, no need any more for CERN, all one has to do is look at one’s reflection in a mirror. J. H. van Vleck was doing this when shaving early one morning, just as the sun was rising, at the Gordon Conference in 1976 at Holderness School, New Hampshire. He said “It’s awfully early isn’t it?”. I was a scruffy apparition who had just done my training on the American football pitch. From jet lag I had no idea what the time was.

Sent: 27/11/2014 16:08:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 279(7): Photon Mass from the Evans / Morris Effects

The definitions of x in eqs.(10) and (14,15) differ by a factor of c^2. Using

x = (m c / hbar) ^2

gives the result computer by computer. The last expression is that for the mass, both are quite complicated.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. November 2014 um 14:24 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

Computatioon of Note 279(7) by Horst Eckardt

Friday, November 28th, 2014

Many thanks again. Graphs of the way in which the photon mass behaves would be very interesting, when you have the time of course. It would also be possible to give an estimate of the mass. I will write up UFT279 as a four author paper after one final note on photon mass calculated from an n photon beam.

Sent: 28/11/2014 09:10:38 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Checking Note 279(7), Photon Mass Calculation

This is the calculation with the right mass expressions at the end.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 28. November 2014 um 08:30 geschrieben:

Many thanks again, the units of x in Eq. (10) are energy divided by h bar = inverse seconds so that is the correct factor to use in Eqs. (16) onwards. In Eqs. (14) and (15) the units are also correct, mc / h bar = kgm m / s /(kgm (m / s) squared seconds) = inverse metres, the unit of kappa. So your computations are again very interesting and correct, as long as the x is defined as (m c squared) / h bar. They give the photon mass from ordinary reflection and refraction. This means that the Higgs boson does not exist, no need any more for CERN, all one has to do is look at one’s reflection in a mirror. J. H. van Vleck was doing this when shaving early one morning, just as the sun was rising, at the Gordon Conference in 1976 at Holderness School, New Hampshire. He said “It’s awfully early isn’t it?”. I was a scruffy apparition who had just done my training on the American football pitch. From jet lag I had no idea what the time was.

Sent: 27/11/2014 16:08:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 279(7): Photon Mass from the Evans / Morris Effects

The definitions of x in eqs.(10) and (14,15) differ by a factor of c^2. Using

x = (m c / hbar) ^2

gives the result computer by computer. The last expression is that for the mass, both are quite complicated.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. November 2014 um 14:24 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

279(7).pdf

Checking Note 279(7), Photon Mass Calculation

Friday, November 28th, 2014

Many thanks again, the units of x in Eq. (10) are energy divided by h bar = inverse seconds so that is the correct factor to use in Eqs. (16) onwards. In Eqs. (14) and (15) the units are also correct, mc / h bar = kgm m / s /(kgm (m / s) squared seconds) = inverse metres, the unit of kappa. So your computations are again very interesting and correct, as long as the x is defined as (m c squared) / h bar. They give the photon mass from ordinary reflection and refraction. This means that the Higgs boson does not exist, no need any more for CERN, all one has to do is look at one’s reflection in a mirror. J. H. van Vleck was doing this when shaving early one morning, just as the sun was rising, at the Gordon Conference in 1976 at Holderness School, New Hampshire. He said “It’s awfully early isn’t it?”. I was a scruffy apparition who had just done my training on the American football pitch. From jet lag I had no idea what the time was.

Sent: 27/11/2014 16:08:06 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 279(7): Photon Mass from the Evans / Morris Effects

The definitions of x in eqs.(10) and (14,15) differ by a factor of c^2. Using

x = (m c / hbar) ^2

gives the result computer by computer. The last expression is that for the mass, both are quite complicated.

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. November 2014 um 14:24 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

279(7).pdf

Computations by Horst Eckardt for UFT279

Friday, November 28th, 2014

Many thanks full of interest! As Horst indicates, these numerical results could be tested experimentally using a device to measure the frequency. Perhaps this could be done by Den Davies in glass.

1) In general the complex refractive index of note 279(5), Eq. (40) must be used in Eq. (39). However, this is an equation for the real valued left hand side, so the real part of the square of the complex refractive index is the relevant part:

Real (n squared) = n’ squared – n” squared

= eps’ sub r

from Eq. (8) of Note 278(4). Here epsilon’ sub r is the relative permittivity of the medium in which the refraction takes place (e.g. glass or water). The relative permittivity in general is a spectrum, it goes through a dispersion at every absorption peak of any spectrum, for example a visible frequency spectrum. When there is no dielectric loss, it is a constant.

2) The angle of refraction may be calculated from Snell’s experimental Law, Eq. (21) of Note 279(5):

sin theta = n sub 1 sin theta sub 1

where theta is the incident angle, theta sub 1 is the angle of refraction and n sub 1 is the real part of the refractive index of the refracting medium. The real part of the refractive index is given by eq. (12) of note 278(4):

(real n sub 1) squared = (eps’ sub r + (eps’ sub r squared + eps” sub r squared) power half) / 2

where eps’ sub r is the relative dielectric permittivity and eps” is the relative dielectric loss of the refracting medium. In general these are both spectra. The power absorption coefficent in neper wavenumbers is

alpha = omega eps” sub r / (c eps’ sub r)

A theory or experimental spectrum is needed to find the dielectric dispersion and loss, and then the refractive index. In a simple case the refractive index may be taken to be a constant, the ordinary refractive index of water or glass in the visible range.

Sent: 27/11/2014 15:22:11 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Dispersion curves

I evaluated the results for refracted and reflected frequencies graphically. there is a clear “dispersion” of frequency with the incident angle theta. The second solotution is the physical one in both cases, see figures.The refracted frequency goes to zero for theta to pi/2. This should be experimentally verifyable by glass for example, where there is nearly no absorption.

I was surprised that the sum of refracted and reflected frequency does not give the frequency of the incident light (assumed: 1.e15 Hz). However, we have to use the formula with temperature effects as eq.(4) in note 279(6) for the linear approximation. Although the statistics terms are nearly unity, they introduce a quadratic dependence on omega which probably gives the effect. Then the original omega comes out nearly exactly as shown in the third graph.

How can we proceed with a complex refraction index? There are some questions:

– Do we insert the real parts of n1 and n1 squared in eq.(39) of note 279(5)?

– How do we compute the angle of refraction from Snell’s law? Do we also use the real part of n1 here?

Horst

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 27. November 2014 um 14:24 geschrieben:

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

Daily Report 26/11/14

Friday, November 28th, 2014

There were 2,337 files downloaded (“hits”) from 474 reading sessions or distinct visits during the day, main spiders baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Auto1 703, Auto2 94, UFT145 615, F3(Sp) 374, Book of Scientometrics 149, UFT88 116, Englynion 89, CEFE 56, Engineering Model 54, Llais 47, Evans Equations 58 numerous (Spanish), Auto Sonnets 17, Principles of ECE (unfinished draft) 14 to date in November 2014. Engineering Carleton University Canada LCR Resonant; Swiss Federal Institute (ETH) Zurich UFT175; French Atomic and Alternative Energy Commission Diplomatic Reply to ‘t Hooft by Gareth Evans; University of Lille 1 UFT42; University of Poitiers general; University of St. Etienne UFT43; Free University of Amsterdam AIAS Staff, FAQ, B3 Field, Obsolete Concepts of the Standard Model, Five Definitive Proofs; Academ Organization Russian Federation Family History; Russian Academy of Sciences Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics Moscow Region UFT10; Vologda Region Russia general; University of Durham UFT216. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2014.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: November 2014 – URL
Generated 27-Nov-2014 12:00 EST

279(7): Photon Mass from the Evans / Morris Effects

Thursday, November 27th, 2014

This note gives a simple one photon theory in which the photon mass is given by Eq. (23) in terms of the incoming and refracted frequencies and the angle between the incoming and refracted beams. This note can be checked by computer algebra and the quantitative frequency shifts sent over a few days ago used to calculate the photon mass, given the angle of refraction. The next step is to incorporate photon mass in to the Planck distribution in an n photon monochromatic beam.

a279thpapernotes7.pdf