This looks interesting and important. The original B(3) theory was worked out in November 1991 after returning to Cornell from Zuerich using conventional nonlinear optics. The first few UFT papers were based on the need to find a theory that developed O(3) electrodynamics, incorporated B(3) and which also unified gravitation and electromagnetism. See for example UFT15 and UFT16. In these papers the B(3) field was seen to be part of Cartan geometry based on torsion. Later, ECE2 was developed as you know in UFT313 – UFT388 to date. The antisymmetry principle was first developed in UFT131 ff. as you know, and the vacuum theory developed in the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers, which are always well studied. In the latest papers the Principle of Antisymmetry and the law of conservation of antisymmetry are fully developed. The B(3) field becomes proportional to – omega x A and magnetizes the aether. The original B(3) field was defined by:
B(3)* = – (kappa / A(0)) A x A*
where the conjugate product A x A* = A(1) x A(2) produces an axial vector, B(3) * . This can now be written:
B(3)* (interaction with vacuum) = – omega x A* = – (kappa / A(0)) A x A*
where omega is the spin connection vector. The magnetization of the vacuum by a circularly polarized electromagnetic field is the inverse Faraday effect M(3)* = B(3)* / mu0, where mu(0) is the vacuum permeability. So:
omega = kappa A / A(0)
where kappa is the wave vector of a circularly polarized electromagnetic field. Therefore omega is the vector potential of a plane wave within the scaling factor A(0).
For the readership, note carefully that the above equations conserve P, C, T, PC, PT, CT and PCT, where P is parity inversion symmetry, T is motion reversal symmetry, C is charge conjugation symmetry. Every equation of B(3) theory and O(3) electrodynamics conserves these symmetries, and now it is known that they must also conserve antisymmetry. It is not possible to obtain an E(3) field from the conjugate product because E(3) is a polar vector, and experimentally, polarization by the conjugate product of nonlinear optics is not observed, only magnetization. P symmetry is violated in electroweak theory, producing a tiny chirality and optical activity in atoms. However standard model electroweak theory has been completely refuted in UFT225, and completely refuted by conservation of antisymmetry, because the U(1) sector symmetry of the standard model is refuted by antisymmetry, therefore so is the U(1) x SU(2) sector of electroweak theory . To conserve antisymmetry one must go to the ECE2 level of physics.
All of this is well accepted by the vast ECE and ECE2 School of Thought.
To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 23/09/2017 19:05:36 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Fundamental Symmetry Conservation in the B(3) Field TheoryThe vacuum magnetization by B(3) is an interesting interpretation. I will work out the antisymmetry effects for two or three kinds of plane waves, starting from a given vector potential A and assumung phi=0. There will be matter and vacuum parts of the E and B fields, in so far the results differ from the original B(3) field theory which is for free space without curvature and torsion effects to my understanding. The 3-components of E and B seem to come out as the vacuum parts of E and B in the ECE2 caclulation with antisymmetry.
I will write up part 3 of paper 388 next week.Horst
Am 23.09.2017 um 11:51 schrieb EMyrone:
To Horst: This is explained in Omnia Opera OO395, the Reply to Barron of 14th Dec.1992 published in Physica B Buckingham had blocked my reply in “Chemical Physics Letter” almost forty times before finally agreeing to reject Barron’s paper there. I am told by Richard Amoroso that the B(3) field was nominated for a Nobel Prize in about 1995. Bo Lehnert told Richard Amoroso, sometime Chair of the Vigier Symposia, that the B(3) field had been nominated several times for a Nobel Prize. I strongly recommend a reading of “The Enigmatic Photon” and the “Advances in Chemical Physics” articles of volume 119, the second edition of the award winning “Modern Nonlinear Optics”. As you know these are in the Omnia Opera. Buckingham and Barron invented a mythical “complete experiment symmetry” which was rejected by theoretical particle physicists like Prof. Justin Huang of the University of Missouri. The only relevant symmetries are explained in OO395. These symmetries are the usual ones in physics and are applied to equations. There is now a new law of physics, the conservation of antisymmetry. The B(3) field far from material matter can now be interpreted as the magnetization of the aether by a circularly polarized electromagnetic field, an inverse Faraday effect. As soon as the CP electromagnetic field interacts with matter (for example an electron), the inverse Faraday effect occurs.