Archive for January, 2016

Link to Osamu Ide Video on www.aias.us

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

Agreed with GJE.

In a message dated 20/01/2016 12:40:12 GMT Standard Time, garethjohnevans@hotmail.co.uk writes:

Congratulations to Osamu ? Perhaps Alex could advise on funding opportunities? Perhaps it would also help if there were joint funding applications involving Horst, Doug etc and Osamu? Demonstrating the close agreement between theory and experiment would surely help in applications for funds.

Sent from my Samsung device

Link to Osamu Ide Video on www.aias.us

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

Many thanks indeed!

In a message dated 20/01/2016 11:18:48 GMT Standard Time,

I converted the DVD to a mp4 file and will upload it to the website.
you can already watch it here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_udwnQCjJaJem94WU5DT01tS00
(only visible for people knowing this link)

Osamu: the end of the DVD is very abrupt. Is this also the case in your original version? The length is 5:50 min.

Horst

Am 20.01.2016 um 09:08 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks, my postal address is Dr. M. W. Evans, 50 Rhyddwen Road, Craigcefnparc, Swansea, SA6 5RA, Wales, Great Britain. Would it be possible to send a copy of Dave Burleigh by mail for posting? If Horst has a copy he could post it from Muenich Thanks in anticipation. I think that it is possible to send a DVD by e mail, recently Doug Lindstrom sent the film “The Universe of Myron Evans” by e mail. Maybe Doug can advise on how you can distribute your DVD by e mail. Once on the www.aias.us blog and site it will go on to the San Francisco Internet Archive (www.archive.org)and be permanently archived. I think you are doing important work, and that UFT311 should win a Nobel Prize if the system is anywhere near fair minded.

In a message dated 19/01/2016 18:36:03 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Dr. Evans,

I would like to send you a DVD of my experiment by postal mail.

It shows Ether engine running test and Degoichi experiment.

It is as same as I already sent to Horst and Frank Acland.

It was taken in Aug.2014. So it is not self-exciting test but over-unity test(nearly 400%) and takes 6 minutes to watch.

I would like you to put it on AIAS site if it is possible.

If it is OK I would like to have your postal mailing address.

Regards,

Osamu

P.S. I was failed in Shell GameChanger yesterday. So I have to change my method to find the fund.

Calibration: Number of Printed Pages in a Downloaded Memory File (“hit”)

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

Using Webalizer 2.10 feedback data from 14th to 18th January 2016 the average ratio of printed pages to memory files downloaded was 77.70. It fluctuates as follows: 60.64, 72.31, 50.22, 146.92 and 58.39. So a very rough estimate is about eighty printed pages per hit, or memory file downloaded. This calibration is needed to convert the numbers given each early morning after each item from hits to the equivalent in printed pages – multiply by eighty, or order of magnitude 100, a figure that it easy to remember. For UFT326 for example this gives 16,560 printed pages of the article downloaded so far in January. The printed page is defined as A4, twelve point, single spaced. Each page of this type is 3646 bytes of memory, i.e. 3.646 kilobytes. Webalizer 2.10 also gives the number of bytes downloaded for each item. For UFT326 this is 45.972 megabytes so far in January 2016. This gives 12,609 printed pages, on good agreement with the hits estimate, which is a very rough one. The bytes estimate is of course the accurate one. Assume for argument that the article is ten pages long, then it has been read over a thousand times to date in January 2016. This calibration shows the massive amount of downloading that takes place every day off www.aias.us. This is just one article out of 3081 items on www.aias.us at present. In addition to this is the reading that takes place off www.upitec.org, and also the readings off the blog. The downloading takes place by human reading and by computer, but in both cases the downloaded material is stored and ultimately studied by humans of course. To me this is delightful and exhilarating. As Victor Hugo wrote, one cannot stop the march of ideas, and nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has arrived. This could never have been achieved without many years of dedicated and voluntary international cooperation and AIAS / UPITEC can take justifiable pride in this achievement. Compared with this, the Nobel Prize is inevitably human and subjective, often quite arbitrary as the ghastly case of Sommerfeld shows. The really important thing is the archiving on www.archive.org and www.webarchive.org.uk. That gives the true story, certainly not the Nobel Prize. It would be very nice to win a big N, having been nominated several times, but I would not be heartbroken if I didn’t. Members of the group should also share in a Nobel Prize or any kudos.

FOR POSTING : DVD of the Ide Experiment

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

Many thanks, my postal address is Dr. M. W. Evans, 50 Rhyddwen Road, Craigcefnparc, Swansea, SA6 5RA, Wales, Great Britain. Would it be possible to send a copy of Dave Burleigh by mail for posting? If Horst has a copy he could post it from Muenich Thanks in anticipation. I think that it is possible to send a DVD by e mail, recently Doug Lindstrom sent the film “The Universe of Myron Evans” by e mail. Maybe Doug can advise on how you can distribute your DVD by e mail. Once on the www.aias.us blog and site it will go on to the San Francisco Internet Archive (www.archive.org)and be permanently archived. I think you are doing important work, and that UFT311 should win a Nobel Prize if the system is anywhere near fair minded.

In a message dated 19/01/2016 18:36:03 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Dr. Evans,

I would like to send you a DVD of my experiment by postal mail.

It shows Ether engine running test and Degoichi experiment.

It is as same as I already sent to Horst and Frank Acland.

It was taken in Aug.2014. So it is not self-exciting test but over-unity test(nearly 400%) and takes 6 minutes to watch.

I would like you to put it on AIAS site if it is possible.

If it is OK I would like to have your postal mailing address.

Regards,

Osamu

P.S. I was failed in Shell GameChanger yesterday. So I have to change my method to find the fund.

Daily Report 18/1/16

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

The equivalent of 123,256 printed pages was downloaded during the day (449.392 megabytes of memory) from 2111 memory files downloaded (hits) and 519 distinct visits each averaging 3.2 memory pages and lasting 10 minutes on average. Main spiders cnsat (China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 2898, Top ten 1966, Evans / Morris 1182, Collected scientometrics 336, Barddoniaeth / Collected poetry 277, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 270, Autobiography volumes one and two 214, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 176, Principles of ECE 164, F3(Sp) 140, UFT311 105, Engineering Model 98, UFT88 98, UFT321 80, Evans Equations 79, CEEF 64, Self charging inverter 50, Llais 44, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 25, Three world records by MWE 10, List of most prolific authors 9, UFT313 82, UFT314 70, UFT315 67, UFT316 79, UFT317 32, UFT318 94, UFT319 65, UFT320 57, UFT322 173, UFT323 178, UFT324 51, UFT325 57, UFT326 227, UFT327 216, UFT328 231, UFT329 213, UFT330 206, UFT331 162, UFT332 173, UFT333 167, UFT334 164, UFT335 174, UFT336 55, UFT337 19 to date in January 2016. McGill University Canada Relabelling of summation indices; University of Quebec Trois Rivieres UFT337; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Educational Note Two; Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki Educational Note Two; French IMAG Federation Grenoble Experimntal advahtages of ECE theory, UFT section, my page, Omnia Opera section; Institute of Applied Mathematics and Systems Autonomous National University of Mexico levitron; Mixteca University of Technology Mexico levitron; UK Youth Charitable Organization equation flowcharts; Izmir Institute of Technology Turkey UFT33; Liverpool Hope University Cosmo-7. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 1016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

The g Factor of the Electron in ECE2

Tuesday, January 19th, 2016

My book with Crowell on B(3) and QED (published 2001) “Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics and the B(3) Field” comes up as the fourth site on the first page of google using keywords “Quantum Electrodynamics criticisms”, out of 589,000 results. It is open source in the Omnia Opera on www.aias.us. Gradually I rejected QED, for example UFT85 with Horst Eckardt, written in 2007. I am now ready to apply ECE2 to the anomalous g factor of the electron as affected by the W potential of the vacuum (Aharonov Bohm geometry). The claims of QED to suspiciously amazing precision are refuted in UFT85. The general public does not realize that Dirac rejected QED in his 1978 book “Directions in Physics” on the grounds that QED arbitrarily and incorrectly gets rid of infinities. It was rejected by Feynman himself in 1985 in his book “The Strange Theory of Light and Matter” and described as dippy hocus pocus. That does not inspire overwhelming confidence. The dogmatists behave as if Feynman did not write this, and if Dirac did not exist when it comes to QED. Dirac is idolized on other contexts, but recently he is falling apart under ECE2 scrutiny. In a 1970 Symposium in Texas, Dirac met Feynman and told the latter that QED is an ugly theory. Feynman agreed with Dirac. So why bother with QED? I find it worse than ugly, I find it deceptive because there are hidden arbitrary things such as dimensional regularization and normalization, and there are series containing thousands of terms which cannot be proven to converge, even in the simplest case of a photon interacting with an electron. There are virtual particles that can never be observed. In UFT85, the claimed precision was taken to the cleaners, this is another well known classic paper by now. Now I think it is time to embark on a completely new and much simpler theory of the anomalous g factor of the electron. So this will be the subject of the next note. Quantum chromodynamics is even more of a mess, obscure, full of unobservables and infinities – ‘t Hooft’s paradise. Miles Mathis describes both theories as the glorification of heuristics, in other words a load of old cobblers. Planck called Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics “disgusting”. I would not go so far as that, because matrix mechanics is now the basis of computational quantum mechanics, but point out that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was shredded in UFT175 with Horst Eckardt, another well known classic by now. It has been shredded many terms by the experiments of the Croca group in the University of Lisbon and by other experiments. The dogmatists try to ignore the refutations, so should be ignored by the general public. The latter is by no means stupid. So physicists do not agree on everything, there is an ever so slight disagreement of opinion on some subjects.

UFT88 Read at Penn State

Tuesday, January 19th, 2016

Penn State is ranked 60 in the world by ARWU, 75 by Times and 124 by Webometrics, so is a world ranking university with 95,973 students. I worked there as a Senior Visiting Academic when I was at Cornell. It was read as part of an extensive download of all UFT papers and essays, and a great deal of other material, by the College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State. UFT88 was written in late 2007 and is a famous classic paper by now, often reported on in these early morning reports. It developed into the high impact ECE2 series UFT313-320, 322 – 337 to date, currently being read at the rate of 98,662 times a year. These papers completely refute the Einsteinian era in gravitational physics, and obviously, this great paradigm shift is being recognized worldwide. It is described by Professor Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe, University of Denver, as the post Einsteinian paradigm shift. High quality scientometrics over nearly twelve years show that the paradigm shift is irreversible, so the teaching of Einsteinian general relativity is obsolete and should no longer be funded with the exception of history of science courses. Funding of experimental astronomy can be continued but the data have to be reinterpreted in terms of ECE2 and ECE. Hugely expensive experiments that set out to prove the “precision” of Einsteinian GR serve no purpose. EGR fails totally in whirlpool galaxies whereas ECE and ECE2 give plausible explanations. To ignore these facts is unscientific, and the general public should bring pressure to have such waste of money stopped. They are out in the open at the best places in the world.

Daily Report Sunday 17/1/16

Tuesday, January 19th, 2016

The equivalent of 468,081 printed pages (1.706624 gigabytes of memory) were downloaded during the day mainly due to an extensive site download of all UFT papers and all essays and so on from Penn State. There were 452 distinct visits each averaging 6 memory pages and 14 minutes, main spiders cnsat (China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 papers 2872, Top ten items 1965, Collected Evans Morris 1172 (est), Collected scientometrics 319, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 269. Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 265, Autobiography volumes one and two 210, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 167, Principles of ECE 161, UFT311 105, UFT88 97, Engineering Model 97, UFT321 77, Evans Equations 77, CEFE 62, Self Charging Inverter 50, Llais 44, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 24, Three world records by MWE 10, Most prolific sceintists 9, UFT313 82, UFT314 69, UFT315 66, UFT316 79, UFT317 33, UFT318 94, UFT319 64, UFT320 56, UFT322 57, UFT323 176, UFT324 49, UFT325 55, UFT326 225, UFT327 214, UFT328 230, UFT329 213, UFT330 204, UFT331 162, UFT332 173, UFT333 164, UFT334 163, UFT335 174, UFT336 55, UFT337 16 to date in January 2016. College of Information Sciences and Technology The Pennsylvania State University, extesive site download including all UFT papers and Essays, complete home page material, Autobiography, Collected Poetry, CV and so on; Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of Michigan Overview of ECE Theory; Warsaw School of Economics My page; University of Edinburgh UFT152, 155, 157, 160, 171 and ECE Article. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

UFT47, “Dielectric Theory of Spacetime”

Monday, January 18th, 2016

Good to hear from Russ Davis. The above mentioned UFT47 is a dielectric type ECE theory, and in S. I. units there are of course the vacuum permittivity (eps0) and permeability (mu0). In the Aharonov Bohm effects there are potentials and no fields but eps0 and mu0 exist in the AB vacuum.

Sent: 18/01/2016 15:23:54 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: Discussion of 338(1): Tesla Particles

Prof. Evans,

I have sometimes wondered why the permittivity and permeability of “free space” is non-zero. Dr. Eckardt mentions the possibility of polarizability due to the vacuum particles of Tesla’s theory. Might the AB spacetime particle structure be related to these non-zero values for the permittivity and permeability of “free space?”

-Russ Davis

Discussion of 338(1): Tesla Particles

Monday, January 18th, 2016

Prof. Evans,

I have sometimes wondered why the permittivity and permeability of “free space” is non-zero. Dr. Eckardt mentions the possibility of polarizability due to the vacuum particles of Tesla’s theory. Might the AB spacetime particle structure be related to these non-zero values for the permittivity and permeability of “free space?”

-Russ Davis