Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

a242ndpapernotes5.pdf

a242ndpapernotes4.pdf

1) Refutation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, supporting the well known experimental refutations by groups such as Croca at al.
2) Unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity.
3) Refutation of standard Compton and particle scattering theory and its development with the ECE wave equation.
4) Refutation of the Dirac equation and negative energy, and its replacement with the fermion equation.
5) Development of the quantum force and quantum Hamilton equations.
6) Development of the theory of low energy nuclear reactions.
7) Development of the Aharonov Bohm and superconducting theories.
8) Development of RFR theory.
9) Development of Sagnac effect theory.
10) Many others, reviewed for example in UFT200.

I can have a look at the Debye theory of specific heats,and I also need to start work on Brownian motion theory. At present several major discoveries in astronomy are being made. These are all being accepted internationally by the real professionals. Those who pretend to an administrative domination of ideas have been rejected as obviously false authority,as usual down the ages. Any person who does not work as a physicist cannot be an authority in physics. Any person who cannot play the piano cannot be a concert pianist. This is the big problem with administrators and propaganda vehicles such as wikipedia. However it is very well known to almost everyone that wikipedia tried to defame ECE theory and failed amazingly badly.

a242ndpapernotes2.pdf

In a message dated 10/05/2013 17:23:04 GMT Daylight Time writes:

Unification means of course that quantum mechanics does not need to be considered as a stand alone subject. Microscopic and macroscopic properties are all treatable within this same ECE framework – a mark of the significance of your achievements. This is sometimes not appreciated.

— Original Message —

Subject: FOR POSTING: Major Advances in Quantum Mechanics Made by ECE Theory

These are very well known internationally after nine years of intense study in all universities of any note. There are very many of them, but in answer to Kerry’s question I would say that the main ones include the following small selection, taken almost at random.

1) Refutation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, supporting the well known experimental refutations by groups such as Croca at al.
2) Unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity.
3) Refutation of standard Compton and particle scattering theory and its development with the ECE wave equation.
4) Refutation of the Dirac equation and negative energy, and its replacement with the fermion equation.
5) Development of the quantum force and quantum Hamilton equations.
6) Development of the theory of low energy nuclear reactions.
7) Development of the Aharonov Bohm and superconducting theories.
8) Development of RFR theory.
9) Development of Sagnac effect theory.
10) Many others, reviewed for example in UFT200.

I can have a look at the Debye theory of specific heats,and I also need to start work on Brownian motion theory. At present several major discoveries in astronomy are being made. These are all being accepted internationally by the real professionals. Those who pretend to an administrative domination of ideas have been rejected as obviously false authority,as usual down the ages. Any person who does not work as a physicist cannot be an authority in physics. Any person who cannot play the piano cannot be a concert pianist. This is the big problem with administrators and propaganda vehicles such as wikipedia. However it is very well known to almost everyone that wikipedia tried to defame ECE theory and failed amazingly badly.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 10/05/2013 13:35:11 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 242(2) : Checking Note 242(1) for Self Consistency

I just checked some points but did not check the derivation of (16) so far.
Eq. (16) has the dimension of Omega in the real part but Omega/t in the imaginary part, this seems to hint to an error.
What you are doing is basically solve an equation for an harmonic oscillator with variable coefficients. In fact this then is not an oscillator anymore from a mathematical standpoint. Maxima gives the general solutions %o6 for a general Omega(r(t)). Th double-integrals have to be solved for a concrete Omega or F(r), respectively. The result for a general F(r) is %o9.
Eq.(16) in current form is not solveable analytically.

Horst

242(2).pdf

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 07/05/2013 21:51:41 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Final Version of Note 241(4)

The results are as attached. The function x(r) is plotted in result window %t25. There is a pole around r=alpha, the limits are

x ( r–> alpha) = infinity
x ( gamma -> 1) = 1

The second one is correct, the first looks a bit unplausible for me.
The last plot shows the integrated function t(r). I had an error in a previous version, the function is defined between rmin and rmax of the ellipse and is plausible.

Horst

Am 07.05.2013 18:43, schrieb EMyrone

This is very interesting, at r = alpha exactly the orbit is a circle, I noticed this in previous work, and it seems to be a mathematical property inbuilt into the orbit. This could be circumvented by a boolean that stops r becoming alpha exactly.

In a message dated 07/05/2013 17:39:50 GMT Daylight Time writes:

The integral of Eq.(17) can be solved analytically. r(t) has to be interpolated as discussed.
I see a problem in eq.(4). The denominator becomes zero for r=alpha which holds exactly for two points of the elliptic orbit. It may be that this limit gives 0/0, will analyse this by Maxima. Otherwise x diverges.

Horst

Am 07.05.2013 09:16, schrieb EMyrone

This is the final version of this note, computer algebra is now needed to evaluate eq. (17) numerically and solve the result for r as a function of t. Since r is known as a function of theta from eq. (2), theta can be found as a function of t and animated.

241(4a).pdf