I have been thinking about this myself. I recommend multiplying the general matrix (50) of note 323(3) with each column vector, A sup mu and J sup mu, using computer algebra, then translating the results into vector notation to see whether the gamma disappears or not. It is of course ultra important to sort out the fundamentals. It has been established that there is agreement between the Wikipedia site and Jackson for the general Lorentz transformation of fields, which becomes the general Lorentz transform of accelerations in the new theory I have in mind – creating a theory of general relativity out of the well known work of Coriolis in general dynamics. You have already checked by computer algebra that the matrix (50 of note 323(3) leads to the right expressions for the Lorentz transform of fields. So your computer coding is as usual, rigorously correct.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/07/2015 16:11:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Note 323(4): Double Check on the Lorentz Tarnsforms

This is for a Lorentz boost in Z direction. For an arbitrariy direction of velocity the problem from nore 323(3) remains. Either the general Lorentz matrix is erroneous, or the effect is that gamma disappears for J and A. For the F tensor the gamma in front of E and B is there. There seems to be a difference if a vector or a tensor is transformed, because of the similarity transformation for the tensor.

Horst

Am 28.07.2015 um 15:18 schrieb EMyrone:

This note gives the general Lorentz transform of charge current density and the potential four vector. The two basic errors in the Wikipedia article “Classical Electromagnetism and Special Relativity” are pointed out. The Lorentz covariance of the field equations is given in Eqs. (15) and (16). Note that ECE2 is a theory of general relativity which produces equations with the same structure as the Maxwell Heaviside field equations but in a space with both non zero torsion and non zero curvature. The concepts of torsion and curvature do not exist in MH. So I refer to the transformation of ECE2 as a pseudo Lorentz transform. It is a generally covariant transform that looks like a Lorentz transform. The gravitomagnetic field equations transform in the same way. By using these concepts the well known theory of G. G. Coriolis (1835) can be written as a theory of general relativity. Developments such as this will be the subject of the next notes for UFT323.

I am most grateful to Doug for this letter of support. Dr. Douglas Lindstrom is a three times graduate of the University of British Columbia in Canada and has contributed importantly to ECE theory in work such as UFT292 – UFT299 and UFT321. All of these papers are being intensively studied. Recently he opened a new energy conference as the lead invited speaker to 150 participants in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, U.S. A. All these nominations will be recorded for history in the world’s leading reference vehicle, “Marquis Who’s Who”, in which Doug appears along with about half of the AIAS. So the cumulative effect of the nominations will be to make the new physics solidly mainstream, leading to intense work in engineering in the most urgent search for new energy. The circuit papers UFT311 and UFT321 are a major breakthrough in my opinion.

Sent: 28/07/2015 17:07:08 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Wolff Prize

​I you need another letter of support, here is a brief one. I can elaborate on it if you think that is beneficial.

Doug

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Gareth Evans <garethjohnevans> wrote:

Attached is a copy of the nomination for Horst (with my own letter of support). I suggest that we apply for all three awards with the same application to avoid unnecessary replication and work (unless they insist otherwise). I have copied Alex Hill in in case Alwyn is not able to provide a letter of support on this occasion. We could submit more than three letters of support if Alex would like to write one any way.
You need to insert a current photo in one part of the application Myron. Feel free to read through it and amend as you see fit.
Good luck as ever – you deserve all of these awards!

Have had to send as a pdf because my broadband is currently too slow to send as a word document. Hope this does not create problems.

Best, Gareth

wolfprizeletterofsupport-Wolf2015.pdf

This is a generous letter of support from Prof. Alwyn van der Merwe, Emeritus in the University of Denver, Colorado. He is probably the most eminent physics editor of the late twentieth and early twenty first centuries and stood up to the barrage of early attacks on B(3) even after I had been removed from UNCC for proposing B(3). Those attacks have now all stopped. He was also instrumental in the award of the Civil List Pension. He is of course a most distinguished scientist, a Ph. D. of both Amsterdam and Bern.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/07/2015 17:00:29 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: 150728. LETTER OF SUPPORT: WOLF PRIZE.

Dear Professors Myron Evans and Gareth Evans,

Would it be OK if I simply amend my earlier letter of support as follows:

Candidate: Prof. Dr. Myron Wyn Evans

Supporter: Prof. Emeritus Alwyn van der Merwe, Dept. of Physics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

I should like to support the nomination of Professor Myron Evans for the Wolf Prize in the strongest possible terms for Chemistry. Physics, and Mathematics. I am familiar with Myron’s work, ever since I, as founding Editor-in-Chief of both Plenum Press’s Foundations of Physics Letters and Kluwer Academic’s monograph series Fundamental Theories of Physics (nowadays continued by Springer), published his early papers and books on his discovery of B(3) (nominated by Jean-Pierre Vigier and others for the Nobel prize) and his ECE (Einstein-Cartan-Evans) theory, always on the recommendation of three referees. Since that time enormous strides has been made, by Professor Evans and his colleagues at the Alpha Institute of Advanced Studies, with the development of his ECE theory in physics and chemical physics. Their findings have been chronicled in more than 305 papers at the website www.aias.us, which has been downloaded and studied tens of million times—a breathtaking statistic—by scientists at the top universities all over the world.

Professor Evans has been the recipient of the D.Sc. degree (1978), when he was 27 (a world record), the Harrison Memorial Prize (1978) and the Meldola Medal (1979) of the Royal Society of Chemistry, and was awarded a Civil List Pension in 2005 by the British government. It would be eminently fitting to award him the Wolf Prize in support of his ongoing trail-blazing work on the ECE theory and related areas in chemical physics for the benefit of mankind.

EVANSAWARDS,WOLFPRIZE.docx

There were 3,135 files downloaded from 424 reading sessions, main spiders baidu, google, MSN and yahoo. Collection of 28 Evans / Morris papers 550 est., Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 315, Autobiography 285, Scientometrics 269, F3(Sp) 212, Eckardt / Lindstrom Papers (UFT292 – UFT299) 215, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 186, Evans Equations 145 (numerous Spanish), Principles of ECE 139, UFT88 114, UFT 311 104, Engineering Model 101, UFT321 73, UFT314 66, UFT319 61, UFT315 57, UFT317 57, CEFE 55, UFT316 53 (est), Llais 41, UFT320 35 (est.), UFT322 21 to date in July 2015. University of Waterloo Canada UFT177; University of Virginia my page, University of Poitiers general; Italian National Institute of Nuclear Research / University of Aquila associated group (INFN Aquila) levitron; Kitsuregawa Laboratory Institute of Industrial Physics University of Tokyo UFT123; U. S. Archives San Francisco general; University of Cape Town South Africa UFT18. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for July 2015.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

This note gives the general Lorentz transform of charge current density and the potential four vector. The two basic errors in the Wikipedia article “Classical Electromagnetism and Special Relativity” are pointed out. The Lorentz covariance of the field equations is given in Eqs. (15) and (16). Note that ECE2 is a theory of general relativity which produces equations with the same structure as the Maxwell Heaviside field equations but in a space with both non zero torsion and non zero curvature. The concepts of torsion and curvature do not exist in MH. So I refer to the transformation of ECE2 as a pseudo Lorentz transform. It is a generally covariant transform that looks like a Lorentz transform. The gravitomagnetic field equations transform in the same way. By using these concepts the well known theory of G. G. Coriolis (1835) can be written as a theory of general relativity. Developments such as this will be the subject of the next notes for UFT323.

a323rdpapernotes4.pdf

OK thanks, chapters one and three are typeset to perfection. Makes a change from Elsevier.

I will have another look at this later today. From the minimal prescription p sup mu goes to e A sup mu, the latter should transform in the same way as the energy momentum four vector, i. e. should transform according to Eqs. (27) to (30) with E replaced by phi and p replaced by A. In the non relativistic limit:

p’ = to p – E v / c squared, A’ = A – phi c / c squared

In the relativistic theory insert gamma in front of the LHS terms and add the non linear terms. They are all just simple transforms of four vectors. The purpose of this note is to define the baseline for development of relativistic effects in gravitomagnetic theory.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/07/2015 10:22:43 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Computer Check of Note 323(3)

Inspecting eqs. %o7 and %o10, it seems that bold J is correct but the factor gamma in front of bold A has to be removed. The last terms in the equations are for example

Multiplying this out, the component Jx appears without gamma, the same for A.

Horst

Am 28.07.2015 um 10:58 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks for this valuable check by computer. There is yet another error in Wikipedia. Eqs. (38) and (39) are correct, by the minimal prescription they transform in the same way as momentum, but the Wikipedia article misses out a gamma for the current. The right result is:

J’ = gamma (J – rho v) + (gamma – 1) (J dot unit v)unit v

where unit v = v bold / v . This answers your question below. The end result is the usual one, readers should not ever believe wikipedia withut checking it by hand and computer, and when it comes to ECE, wikipedia is known to be a troll site. Marquis is the world’s leading reference vehicle, certainly not wikipedia. So having completed this check, the development of gravitomagnetism and a new kind of dynamics can continue with accuracy. There should be an investigation into the way wikipedia tried to destroy my career and ECE theory, and failed.

e
To: EMyrone
Sent: 27/07/2015 15:42:40 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 323(3): Details of the Lorentz Transform

I checked the not until eq.(54) so far. In (10) the second Lorentz transform must contain inverted beta’s in sign because it is the inverse transformation. Then the unit matrix comes out.
Eqs.(27-30) are correct, also (31-34).
The jeneral transformations (36-39) are somewhat problematic. I wonder why for J’ the orignal J appears, while for A’ the original A is multiplied by a factor gamma. Applying the general transformation (50) gives the same type of result for both: see output lines o7 and o10 of the attached. It seems that the factor gamma in front of A in eq.(39) is wrong.
I first struggled about the factor of 1/v^2 which does not appear in (36-39). However, as you wrote, one can prove that

(gamma-1)/v^2 = gamma^2/((gamma+1)*c^2)

which I did at the end.

Concerning (64): I guess that the signs of beta have to be changed in the rhight-most matrix. Where did you get the matrix form

F’ = Lamba F Lambda^-1 ?

Is this the basis transform? Is this described in VAPP? Why isn’t it simply

F’ = Lambda F ?

Horst

Am 27.07.2015 um 13:16 schrieb EMyrone:

This note gives all details of the Lorentz transform, so that it can be applied to gravitomagnetism and to a new type of general dynamics being developed in teh notes for UFT323.

I looked up UFT282 on www.aisa.us, it is still the handwritten version. If the typeset version of chapter two is ready please send it over to me and to Dave Burleigh and Alex Hill. The typeset version of chapter two can then be posted as UFT282. I have just sent over the typset version of chapter three for posting as UFT283.

Sent: 27/07/2015 18:20:55 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Typeset Version of Chapter Three of “Principles of ECE”

If you have the typeset version of Chapter Two, with typewritten equations, in Word format, please send me a copy for translation.

Thanks.

Regards,

Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:26 AM
Subject: Typeset Version of Chapter Three of “Principles of ECE”

I received this with great thanks form Horst and will proof it tomorrow morning. The book is progressing very well and many thanks to Horst and the typesetters.

Many thanks for this valuable check by computer. There is yet another error in Wikipedia. Eqs. (38) and (39) are correct, by the minimal prescription they transform in the same way as momentum, but the Wikipedia article misses out a gamma for the current. The right result is:

J’ = gamma (J – rho v) + (gamma – 1) (J dot unit v)unit v

where unit v = v bold / v . This answers your question below. The end result is the usual one, readers should not ever believe wikipedia withut checking it by hand and computer, and when it comes to ECE, wikipedia is known to be a troll site. Marquis is the world’s leading reference vehicle, certainly not wikipedia. So having completed this check, the development of gravitomagnetism and a new kind of dynamics can continue with accuracy. There should be an investigation into the way wikipedia tried to destroy my career and ECE theory, and failed.

e
To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 27/07/2015 15:42:40 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 323(3): Details of the Lorentz Transform

I checked the not until eq.(54) so far. In (10) the second Lorentz transform must contain inverted beta’s in sign because it is the inverse transformation. Then the unit matrix comes out.
Eqs.(27-30) are correct, also (31-34).
The jeneral transformations (36-39) are somewhat problematic. I wonder why for J’ the orignal J appears, while for A’ the original A is multiplied by a factor gamma. Applying the general transformation (50) gives the same type of result for both: see output lines o7 and o10 of the attached. It seems that the factor gamma in front of A in eq.(39) is wrong.
I first struggled about the factor of 1/v^2 which does not appear in (36-39). However, as you wrote, one can prove that

(gamma-1)/v^2 = gamma^2/((gamma+1)*c^2)

which I did at the end.

Concerning (64): I guess that the signs of beta have to be changed in the rhight-most matrix. Where did you get the matrix form

F’ = Lamba F Lambda^-1 ?

Is this the basis transform? Is this described in VAPP? Why isn’t it simply

F’ = Lambda F ?

Horst

Am 27.07.2015 um 13:16 schrieb EMyrone:

This note gives all details of the Lorentz transform, so that it can be applied to gravitomagnetism and to a new type of general dynamics being developed in teh notes for UFT323.

323(3).pdf

This is excellently typeset by co author Horst Eckardt, a very large amount of work for which we are all most grateful at AIAS. I cannot find a single error, others here may like to go through it and proof it. I think we can add a bibliography once the whole book is typeset. I will then publish it in a joint venture with “New Generation” in softback. The book is being read thousands of times a year open source (UFT281 to UFT288).

To: Emyrone@aol.com
CC: steve.bannister@econ.utah.edu, DWLindstrom@gmail.com
Sent: 27/07/2015 13:09:45 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Typesetting of Principles of ECE Theory, chapter 3

Meanwhile I have typeset chapter 3. Steve is working on another paper.
Please check for typos.

Did we have a bibliography for the whole book? I could not find that.
You are giving references [1-10] in the text. I added some other.
Perhaps it would be good to have a bibliography per chapter. This would
simplify the typesetting.

Horst

PECE-3.pdf