Fully agreed with Richard Amoroso who is a capable referee in his own right of “Criticisms of the Einstein Field Equation” (CEFE). The point is that if the old school is consulted it will reject the new physics without going in to the logic. We have seen this over and over again in the last decade. CEFE has been read maybe five thousand times open source, indicating huge dissatisfaction with the old school. It may be that “Developments of the Einstein Field Equation” would be a compromise title acceptable to all. I was nominated for a Nobel Prize several times for the B(3) field because it indicated the Poincare / de Broglie / Vigier photon mass, and this is indicated by thess new developments mentioned by Richard Amoroso. The Einstein Cartan Evans (ECE) theory indicates gravitational radiation from its gravitational field equations. The ECE theory has been a huge success, having been read 36 to 50 million times since 2002. I have just sent around the tenth anniversary of the Book of Scientometrics that meticulously records all the interest.
In a message dated 30/04/2014 14:29:51 GMT Daylight Time, noeticj@mindspring.com writes:
Dear Song Yu@WSPC.COM.SG>
This is an amazing moment in the history of physical cosmology@WSPC.COM.SG>
The evidence for G waves is actually not solid, there is evidence of ‘something’ yes but probably most certainly not G-waves (they have rushed without care in same way you remind us)@WSPC.COM.SG>
The BICEP2 telecsope polarizations may have a totally different interpretation in liu of the very recent Robitelle (sp?) discovery on fundamental error in interpretation of Kirkoff’s Law and how it relates to Black Body radiation and how this was used now probably erroneously by Planck etc in the very founding of quantum theory itself. This could lead to a shakeup like the end of epicycles that Copernicus etc implemented with switch from geocentricity to heliocentricity. It could lead to radical new interp of cosmology, Hubble discovered redshift not expansion of universe etc etc . There are other hints of amazing changes on horizon like the AdS5 Dodecahedral ‘wrap around’ universe. We could go on quite a bit but yes much care should be taken not to run without rigor and precision like chickens with heads cut off. As our favorite WSPC editor we appreciate and please continue to see we bridle the horses to the wagons properly and carefully and as we certainly have opportunities to make unique history…@WSPC.COM.SG>
best@WSPC.COM.SG>
Amoroso@WSPC.COM.SG>
Dear Prof Evans,
We are glad to receive all the submissions. Thank you very much.
However, the title of this book looks very “big” and we need to pay more
attention. Especially when physicists have found solid evidence of the
gravitational waves recently, we should be more careful to publish books
that are criticizing Einstein’s theory. We are planning to send this
book to several reviewers who are world-class experts in General
Relativity. Please be patient and wait for their response.Thanks again for your great contribution.
Yours,
Song YuEMyrone@aol.com wrote:
> Many thanks to coauthor Horst Eckardt, who put a great deal of work
> into the book as can be seen. The co authors are delighted to work
> with World Scientific on this project.
>
>