Archive for November, 2010

Electron Diffraction

Thursday, November 11th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:30 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Electron Diffraction

This is the archetypical experiment to prove that the electron is a wave. My idea is to disturb the wavelength of the electron beam with a gamma ray beam colliding with the electron beam at various angles. The interference pattern is not that of the gamma rays, but that of the electron waves. The change in the electron wave interferogram is easily measurable for the Aharonov Bohn effect for example, when Chambers put an iron whisker between the electron beams. Electron diffraction is also used in electron microscopes. L. H. Ryder describes the AB effect on pp. 98 ff. of his book, “Quantum Field Theory”. This AB theory is incorrect but the experimental set up and basic diffraction theory is OK. The phase difference between electron waves form the two openings of a Young interferometer is:

delta = 2 pi a / lambda

where a is geometrical and lambda the electron wavelength. The experiment can be repeated with an electron beam replacing the gamma wave beam, so that there is electron electron collision. In both cases there should be a shift a which is a function of angle and so on. The easiest thing to do is to take data form the electron Compton effect, which is a well known technique based on the modification of an electron microscope. We have already shown that the theory fails completely using data from a Canadian group.

View article…

The Concept of Covariant Mass

Saturday, November 6th, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, November 05, 2010 2:53 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: The Concept of Covariant Mass

I would suggest that use be made of the covariant mass of ECE theory, defined by:

R = (mc / h bar) squared

R is defined directly from geometry, the very fundamental tetrad postulate of Cartan. The interaction of a photon and electron is governed by two ECE wave equations, in fact I have already developed this method in papers such as UFT 19 and 78. Advanced computational methods need to be applied.

View article…

162(3): Setting up the Equations for Raman Scattering

Monday, November 1st, 2010

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Sunday, October 31, 2010 8:25 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 162(3): Setting up the Equations for Raman Scattering

This note sets up the equations of Raman scattering with momentum conservation. The equations will be solved in a following note. It is shown that each orbital has a net non-zero linear momentum p. The centrifugal part of the potential in the H atom for example is

V (centrifugal) = p squared / (2 mu)

where mu is the reduced mass. Therefore in Raman scattering there must be conservation of momentum. This elementary fact has apparently never been considered in Raman scattering. If it is considered the theory of Raman scattering will collapse in the same way as that of the Compton effect and absorption. The theory will seem to be true from energy conservation alone, but with both energy and momentum conservation and with the de Broglie postulates, staggering self inconsistencies will appear. These inconsistencies can only be addressed with general relativity as corrected by ECE – The October Postulates. It is now known that the original general relativity of Einstein is mathematically incorrect unfortunately, but has been cured satisfactorily by ECE. So as Einstein himself wrote many times, quantum mechanics of the old type was incomplete.

a162ndpapernotes3.pdf

View article…