Archive for April, 2012

Some Comments on The New Lagrangian Theory of Light Deflection by Gravitation

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:28 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Some Comments on The New Lagrangian Theory of Light Deflection by Gravitation

This is a simple first theory and should be regarded as such. The lagrangian is the same as that used in the precession of planetary orbits, the same lagrangian theory describes precession and light bending on the classical level. Einstein is now disregarded as wrong by much of the profession that follows the ECE sites, and this theory is a limit of ECE unified field theory. The new force law is eq. (12) of note 216(4), and this can be viewed as a new universal force law of gravitation, replacing that of Robert Hooke and Isaac Newton, but still on the classical level. The new universal force law of gravitation for the solar system is a sum of inverse square and inverse cube terms in r. The gravitational potential is a sum of inverse r and inverse square terms in r and gives the lagrangian eq. (10) of note 216(4). This lagrangian is used to calculate the light deflection due to gravitation using the rough approximation (17) for the total energy E. The result for light deflection is eq. (31), which should be regarded as a rough approximation in a first theory. However it gives the experimental value of “twice Newton” with x = 0.378. Many refinements and developments are now possible, because this is a whole new subject of classical dynamics, the oldest part of physics. Einstein became famous because it was thought quite wrongly as it turns out that his theory gave light deflection by gravitation and precession self consistently wthout any adjustable parameters. Grave doubts about Einstein’s mathematics were pointed out as early as Dec. 22nd 1915 by Karl Schwarzschild and repeated by some of the most distinguished physicists for almost a hundred years. The AIAS work finally showed that the theory is riddled with all kinds of errors. Unfortunately there is now a huge amount of dogmatic inertia about the Einstein theory and that is a societal problem. All of that must be rejected as anthropomorphic and unscientific. In the new Lagrangian theory there are no adjustable variables either, the theory is based directly on observation. The theory could have been given any time between 1788 and 2012, but never was. For galactic phenomena and so on the force law is different, so the adjective “universal” is used in the old seventeenth century meaning, i.e. solar system only. Note that ECE relativity is still needed for phenomena such as gravitational red shift, a time dilatation phenomenon basically. The constrained Minkowski method seems to be the best way forward for that. All precessional phenomena can be described by the new lagrangian method, e.g. precession of the equinox and perhaps also Thomas precession. The new universal gravitational potential looks entirely different from the old inverse r potential.

View article…

notes 216(1) and (2)

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:00 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: notes 216(1) and (2)

Many thanks again! These values of photon mass are plausible given the rough approximations used, and can of course be refined using the PLAnck distribution and in many other ways. In the last two notes the famous twice Newton result is derived classically with the precessing hyperbolae orbit for x = 0.378.

In a message dated 18/04/2012 10:33:05 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

I recalculated the notes, there seem to be slight numerical differences. The computer results are:

first note:
eq.(7) epsilon = 4.70867 * 10^5
eq.(34) m = 1.785 * 10^-46 kg

second note, last equation:
m = 2.225 * 10^-35 kg

The iterative scheme defined by eq.(21) does not give different results in the first 10 decimal places or so, the approximation (24) is valid.

Horst

View article…

216(4): The value of x for Light Deflection by Gravitation

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:44 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 216(4): The value of x for Light Deflection by Gravitation

The attached is a simple theory that gives x = 0.378 for the observed value of “twice Newton” for light deflection by a mass M. Horst Eckardt has plotted some hyperbolae for x = 0.3 in UFT215. For light deflection by the sun the eccentricity is very large because the deflection is only a few arc seconds.

a216thpapernotes4.pdf

View article…

216(2): Refined Estimate of Photon Mass

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:35 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 216(2): Refined Estimate of Photon Mass

On the simple Newtonian level this is given by eq. (21), a cubic in m that can be solved by computer. I give a detailed account of the derivation of light deflection by gravitation in the Newtonian theory, giving the usual result (11). Most accounts on the net are vague and confusing, or erroneous. The deflection angle is the angle between the asymptotes of the hyperbola, given by eq. (5). The next step is to include the precession constant x in this calculation. Then light deflection by gravitation can be explained entirely without general relativity. These estimates of photon mass are very simple to make and this is a “toy model” of photon mass. However it gives reasonable results. The value of photon mass depends on the light frequency used and on the de Broglie equation. The latter has major shortcomings as discussed in detail in UFT158 to UFT166, intensely studied papers worldwide. The Einstein theory has been shredded into atoms and contains many errors. This leaves us with the theory based on:

r = alpha / (1 + epsilon cos (x theta))

as developed in a major advance made in UFT215.

a216thpapernotes2.pdf

View article…

FOR POSTING Section 4 of paper 215 by Dr Horst Eckardt

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Monday, April 16, 2012 5:54 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: FOR POSTING Section 4 of paper 215 by Dr Horst Eckardt

These are important additional insights by Gareth Evans, the inverse square law can be replaced by a sum of inverse square and cube, and that sum produces the pattern discovered by Horst Eckardt by computer. In other words a lagrangian analysis produces this sum of terms from:

r = alpha / (1 + epsilon cos (x theta))

initially thought to describe a precessing ellipse, but no known to produce a variety of new orbits that can be looked for in astronomy, and on the molecular level as Gareth points out here.

In a message dated 16/04/2012 10:11:23 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

This is very interesting because, as you say, it applies generally. This is potentially more than just a new subject area and may provide important insights across many branches of physics. Nature tends to mimic itself at large and small scales (the macro and micro levels). This new physics introduces a logical consistency for the first time.

Best, Gareth

View article…

Rough Estimate of Photon Mass from Age of the Universe

Sunday, April 15th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Sunday, April 15, 2012 8:01 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Rough Estimate of Photon Mass from Age of the Universe

This is about ten power minus 63 kilograms using an age of the universe tau of ten power ten years and the de Broglie equation in the format:

h bar / tau = mc squared

This is close to the new estimate just given of ten power minus 68 kilograms. This can be googled up and is:

L. C. Lu, J. Luo and G. T. Gillies, Rep. Prog. Phys., 68, 77 (2005)

One of the major problems caused by identically zero photon mass (amid a myriad of other problems) is that the little group of the Poincare group is the unphysical E(2). Even a standard modeller such as Lewis Ryder admits that this is a fatal error: “Quantum Field Theory” (1996), so I am not quite sure how the standard physics world manages to go on its way openly admitting that what they are doing is rubbish – politics as usual. Finite photon mass implies finite B(3) and vice versa and disproves U(1) gauge theory and CERN unified field theory of the Higgs boson. Only a narrow group of ultra specialists still adhere to zero photon mass theory. The OO papers since 1992 and the UFT papers now refute almost every aspect of standard physics except the Schroedinger equation, whihc is given a deterministic interpretation (Einstein de Broglie Vigier school).

View article…

Newtonian Theory of Photon Mass

Saturday, April 14th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:58 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Newtonian Theory of Photon Mass

The Newtonian theory is valid for x = 1, but as Horst Eckardt showed graphically, using values with x different from 1 can close the hyperbola, so light is trapped. The theory in UFT216 is completely new and valid for any m and M. It asumes that the photon orbits in a hyperbola, but the theory is valid for any conic section. I know that Gareth Evans and Trefor Morris have done very interesting work on photon mass, proving it in a very spectacular way.

View article…

216(1): Simple Theory of Photon Mass

Saturday, April 14th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:43 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 216(1): Simple Theory of Photon Mass

This is a simple theory of photon mass, resulting in eq. (16), from which the photon mass can be calculated using eqs. (16) to (20). In order to do this the methods of UFT202 can be used to estimate L and E. This note illustrates the method for x = 1 in a hyperbolic photon orbit with epsilon greater than one.

a216thpapernotes1.pdf

View article…

Plans for UFT216

Saturday, April 14th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Friday, April 13, 2012 6:47 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Plans for UFT216

This is planned to be another estimate of photon mass using the classical method developed in UFT215 directly from the equation of the conic section:

r = alpha / ( 1 + epsilon cos (x theta))

View article…

“Celestial Mechanics”

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Monday, April 09, 2012 5:45 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: “Celestial Mechanics”

This was written by Pierre Simon, Marquis de Laplace in five volumes and translated into English by Mary Fairfax-Somerville, a predecessor on the Civil List, and after whom Somerville College Oxford is named. It was also translated by Thomas Young of the Young interferometer, whose work Laplace developed using calculus. The celestial mechanics of all orbits is elegantly analysed by the Lagrange method as in the latest note or lecture sent yesterday. Lagrange was raised to Count by Napoleon, and was Legion d’Honneur (as was my co author Vigier, a French statesman (as distinct from politician) and eminent theoretical physicist on the level of Laplace and Lagrange, Euler and Fourier and others of the eighteenth century and early nineteenth century). Although it takes experience to use the lagrangian system, it is relatively easy for planar orbits, where the lagrangian variables are r and theta, or r and beta = x theta. The errors in Einsteinian general relativity are very glaringly obvious when the lagrangian method is used. (I use the S.I. system “lagrangian” for an adjective, lower case l.) Horst Eckardt and I have shown this beyond reasonable doubt. No scientist of any integrity can continue to support such nonsense as Einsteinian general relativity. This is no longer a minority opinion, (assuming that it ever was), it is the overwhelming majority opinion. The AIAS feedback is by now unique history, and such statements as this are objective, no longer subjective. There is an immense problem of what I call fogma, or foggy dogmatism, which is George Bernard Shaw’s science become superstition.

View article…