Planck’s Law in Terms of Wavelength

The dogmatists may try to argue that the conservation of energy and momentum must be expressed in terms of wavelength and not frequency, so that wavelength may vary. This is a very strained argument but they might try it on. It is countered by the fact that Planck law in terms of wavelength is obtained by lambda = c / f. So again it is concluded that the frequencies cannot be the same AND the wavelnegths canno tbe the same. The relation lambda = c / f is the one used by Gareth. So all is OK with his method. My guess is that if a paper were submitted to “Nature” the dogmatic editors would roll out the old dogma without reading the paper at all, and would not send it to referees. If they did this, we can counter and there will be an infinite argument. Instead of waiting another thousand years they can all be accepted immediately on www.aias.us, which is undogmatic and makes as big an impact as “Nature”. I don’t mind arguing for a thousand years because the legacy of ECE is already clear, it will argue for me.

Comments are closed.