Archive for January, 2016

Calculations from 338(4)

Friday, January 22nd, 2016

These are very interesting results which make both the Dirac theory and quantum electrodynamics obsolete overnight. The vacuum particle mass can be used to calculate the mass of the universe, along the lines of UFT calculations of the photon mass in previous papers. The anomalous g factor of the electron is known to high precision experimentally, and is now understood in terms of Eq. (15), a very simple and powerful result. The same theory should produce a vacuum antiparticle because it is the same as the Dirac theory. However, by using the correct denominator on the right hand side of Eq. (7), spin orbit fine structure disappears entirely! So the Dirac theory does not produce fine structure at all, and does not produce the Thomas factor of two. I suspect that Dirac was clever enough to see an approximation that would lead to the observed fine structure and Thomas factor. For about ninety years, the dogmatists failed to see that the rigorous theory, Eq. (7), does not produce fine structure at all. To try to get fine structure in a sensible way will need quite a bit of thought, which is what I intend to try next. I will also calculate the mass of the universe with the mass of the newly inferred vacuum particle (2.1127 ten power minus thirty three kilograms from your calculation). This means that the whole of quantum field theory is thrown into a deep crisis, a Michelson Morley crisis. The dogmatists will duck the challenge of course, but they are being totally ignored now around the world.

Sent: 21/01/2016 17:16:26 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 338(4): A Simple and Accurate Theory of the Electron g Factor

I did some calculations with eq.(15). The vacuum energy quantum is about 1.9*10^-16 Joule = 1.2 keV. This is much less than the electron rest energy of 511 keV. The corresponding frequency is 2.9*10^17 Hz which is in the UV range. So a pair creation of 2 vacuum particles could be possible if this calculation is meaningful. A pair annihilation is less probable because there are no antiparticles. Two universes with matter and antimatter would completely destroy each other on the vacuum level.
The correction to atomic spectra is much smaller than the energy of vacuum particles because the mass ratio is

m(vac) / m(electron) = g-2 = 0.002.

Horst

Am 21.01.2016 um 11:24 schrieb EMyrone:

This theory uses accurate relativistic quantum mechanics to show that the g factor of the electron is:

g = 1 + gamma

where gamma is the Lorentz factor. The latter is given by the de Broglie / Einstein equation:

gamma = h bar omega / (m c squared)
For a rest electron
g = 2

because of the de Broglie equation of the rest electron,

h bar omega0 = m c squared

For a rest electron in contact with the vacuum:

g = 2 + h bar omega(vacuum) / m c squared

= 2.002319314

so the vacuum energy per rest electron is

h bar omega(vacuum) = 0.002319314 m c squared

This theory makes quantum electrodynamics entirely obsolete, and also makes the Dirac theory itself obsolete, because the rigorous equation (4) without the Dirac approximation does not give spin orbit fine structure at all! Both Feynman and Dirac look decidedly sea sick, or dippy in the waves. The Dirac approximation was a contrivance designed to give the right result, and is totally wrong because it gives H0 = 0. A new approach is needed for spin orbit fine structure. Some methods have been suggested in recent UFT papers.

338(4).pdf

Discussion of 338(3)

Friday, January 22nd, 2016

This is one out of several problems with the Dirac approximation, which is H = E = m c squared in the right hand side denominator. This means that the relativistic hamiltonian H = gamma m c squared + U is approximated by H = m c squared, so gamma = 1 and U = 0. The non relativistic hamiltonian H0 = H – m c sqaured is therefore zero, reductio ad absurdum. Despite assuming U = 0, the usual development proceeds with U not equal 0, a diametric self inconsistency. This is how the spin orbit fine structure is obtained, without U there is no spin orbit fine structure at all. Dirac attempted to justify all this in his Nobel lecture by saying that the theory is valid only for slow moving electrons. This never convinced me, and in recent UFT papers this argument by Dirac has been avoided. The development from Eqs. (30) to (32) is the same as the usual theory of the Zeeman effect, in which W is replaced by A, and B = curl A. For a unifomr magnetic field A = (1/2) B x r = (1./2) (curl A) x r. I have not equated curl W with a magnetic field because in the AB vacuum there are no fields, only potentials. In UFT318 the Aharonov Bohm effect was developed briefly with the A potential. Its complete understanding with the W potential needs the complex potential, so

B(1) = curl W(1) – i W(2) x W(3) / W(0)

et cyclicum

so in the Aharonvo Bohm vacuum

W(0) curl W(1) = i W(2) x W(3)

et cyclicum

and B(1) = 0. There are potentials but no fields. I agree with your last point.

In a message dated 21/01/2016 16:35:04 GMT Standard Time writes:

If I see it right, the problem in the Dirac approximation is that in (11) the term H is neglected in the denominator at the RHS, but not in the sum at the LHS. Otherwise we would not obtain an energy operator at all.
I see a problem with the result (32) which is obtained from (30) by using the identity (31). The result (32) does not give a contribution from a cur-free potential W, but eq. (30) does. This seems to be inconsistent. Is there an implicit restriction in eq.(31)? For example that W is rotational in structure exclusively?
Eq.(35) could be inserted into (30) without problems, then it depends only on the scalar product

bold p * bold W
or
bold p * bold Omega.

Horst

Am 20.01.2016 um 12:34 schrieb EMyrone:

This note begins the development of an entirely new theory of the anomalous g factor of the electron by considering it to be due to the spin connection of the AB vacuum (defined entirely by the spin connection within the quantum of magnetic flux h bar / e). In this first note the conventional g = 2 is derived using the usual Dirac approximation, beginning to look decidedly dippy after the latest UFT papers. In the next note the anomalous g factor of the electron (to any experimental precision) is calculated by removing the Dirac approximation. So the dippy Feynman hocus focus of QED is entirely removed, and a far simpler and more powerful theory emerges and is preferred by Ockham’s Razor. The anomalous g factor is due to the spin connection of the AB vacuum.

Discussion of 338(2)

Friday, January 22nd, 2016

Many thanks for going through these notes in detail. The definitions in Eqs. (25) and (34) are the usual ones, in the contravariant four derivative the sign of del is negative. Agreed about 53/54, it denotes the mass m + m(vac). In fact all measured elementary particle masses are always m + m(vac) in this new theory. Agreed with the other comments, ion fact one manifestation of the vacuum mass m(vac) is the g factor of electron. A completely new approach to the vacuum is now possible.

In a message dated 21/01/2016 14:59:40 GMT Standard Time, writes:

In( 25) you wrote the space part of the contravariant 4-vector with negative sign which is correct as far as I remember. in (34/35) you did it the reverse way. Is this a typo?
What does “m” mean in (53/54)? Is it the particle mass alone or including the mass of a vacuum particle?
A scattering process with vacuum particles is consequent. If it is assumed that the mass of a vacuum particle is small, it requires a lot of scattering processes to give a measurable effect. Nonetheless, if the particle density is high, a lot of such scatterings can take place on an atomic scale.
For pair creation (59) quite high energies are required. It is reasonable to assume a 2-particle process because scattering of higher order is less probable. This requires that the energy of the partner masses is very high. Can we assume that there are excited states vacuum states or at least a high velocity? This then would give a high E and the possibility of pair creation.
Finally a high density of vacuum particles gives a relatively high vacuum energy density as predicted by quantum mechanical estimations.

Horst

Am 18.01.2016 um 11:29 schrieb EMyrone:

This note introduces several new fundamental concepts, notably the quantization of potential energy through the W sup mu four potential of ECE2. Applications to energy in the ECE2 vacuum include the inference that a matter wave four vector is shifted by interaction with the vacuum wave four vector, so momentum energy from the vacuum is always observed in any measurement of frequency or wavelength. The vacuum is shown to be governed by the same relativistic equations as matter. For example there is vacuum rest energy:

E0 (vac) = m(vac) c squared

and this can be large, depending on the mass of the ubiquitous vacuum particle m (vac) – the Tesla particle if you like. It is probably responsible for the extra energy observed in LENR. Another example of the rich particle structure of the vacuum is given when two vacuum wave / particles annihilate, to give particle / antiparticle pairs of matter. Apparently this has been obsrved experimentally as indicated this morning by co author Horst Eckardt. It should be possible to experimentally measure the vacuum angular freqeuncy and vacuum wave vector, and a method of doing this is sketched. This theory accounts for the well known radiative corrections in an entirely new way, and the next note will deal with the anomalous g factor of the electron. Note carefully that these equations of ECE2 special relativity are the same, mathematically, as the familiar equations of special relativity, but exist in a space with identically non-zero spin connection, torsion and curvature in general. The Aharonov Bohm vacuum is the special case when the tetrad and spin connection are non zero and where the torsion and curvature are zero. The key new inference is that the W four potential is the spin connection four vector within the quantum of magnetic flux, the fluxon, h bar / e.

UFT Read at Physics Edinburgh

Friday, January 22nd, 2016

Edinburgh is ranked 17 in the world by QS, 24 by Times, 47 by Shanghai (ARWU) and 50 by Webometrics, so it is a world leading university founded in 1582 with 35,258 students. It has an 11.5% acceptance rate and has been asociated with many leading intellectuals, notably twenty Nobel Laureates. Recently there has been intense study of UFT papers from Edinburgh, all recorded in these early morning reports. UFT88 (written in late 2007) is a famous refutation of the Einsteinian general relativity using torsion in the 1902 second Bianchi identity and should be read with UFT99, UFT109 and UFT313 (the Jacobi Cartan Evans identity, the second Bianchi identity correctly incorporating torsion). UFT88 led eventually to the overwhelming rejection of standard physics exemplifed for example by the ECE2 series of papers, UFT313-UFT320, UFT322 – UFT337 to date.currently being read 86,212 times a year. Edinburgh or Dun Edin was the capital of my distant ancestors, the Kings of Gododdin, back to times immemorial. Edinburgh was frequently ahead of Oxford and Cambridge in enlightenment, now staff and students from all three universities frequently study ECE and ECE2 from www.aias.us and www.upitec.org , archived permanently on www.archive.org (the San Francisco internet archives / Library of Congress) and www.webarchive.org from the National Library of Wales at the British Library.

Daily Report 20/1/16

Friday, January 22nd, 2016

The equivalent of 203,907 printed pages was downloaded during the day (743.440 megabytes) from 2761 memory files downloaded (hits) and 601 distinct visits each averaging 4.9 memory pages and 14 minutes, extensive download in the unresolved domain by 188.143.222.unknown. Main spiders cnsat(China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 2973, Top ten items 1978, Evans / Morris papers 1202(est), Collected scientometrics 402, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 304, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 294, Autobiography volumes one and two 227, Proofs that no torsion means no gravitation 193, Principles of ECE 174, Fe(Sp) 170, UFT88 115, UFT311 111, Engineering Model 102, Evans Equations 87, UFT321 84, CEFE 66, Llais 66, Self charging inverter 56, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 29, Three world records by MWE 11, List of most prolific scientists 11, UFT313 87, UFT314 74, UFT315 69, UFT316 83, UFT317 32, UFT318 97, UFT319 66, UFT320 62, UFT322 61, UFT323 178, UFT324 54, UFT325 60, UFT326 230, UFT327 222, UFT328 235, UFT329 214, UFT330 209, UFT331 165, UFT332 175, UFT333 171, UFT334 169, UFT335 177, UFT336 61, UFT337 26 to date in January 2016. United States Argonne National Laboratory UFT25; San Francisco Internet Archives Home page; EQ GCSE education Britain My Page; Department of Physics University of Edinburgh UFT88. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Discussion of 338(4)

Thursday, January 21st, 2016

Many thanks!

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 21/01/2016 11:25:01 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 338(4): A Simple and Accurate Theory of the Electron g Factor

Fantastic, diawn!!

Sent from my Samsung device

Discussion of Note 338(4)

Thursday, January 21st, 2016

OK many thanks!

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 21/01/2016 10:57:49 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 338(4): A Simple and Accurate Theory of the Electron g Factor

A highly interesting result. Will go through the latest notes today.
Horst

Am 21.01.2016 um 11:24 schrieb EMyrone:

This theory uses accurate relativistic quantum mechanics to show that the g factor of the electron is:

g = 1 + gamma

where gamma is the Lorentz factor. The latter is given by the de Broglie / Einstein equation:

gamma = h bar omega / (m c squared)
For a rest electron
g = 2

because of the de Broglie equation of the rest electron,

h bar omega0 = m c squared

For a rest electron in contact with the vacuum:

g = 2 + h bar omega(vacuum) / m c squared

= 2.002319314

so the vacuum energy per rest electron is

h bar omega(vacuum) = 0.002319314 m c squared

This theory makes quantum electrodynamics entirely obsolete, and also makes the Dirac theory itself obsolete, because the rigorous equation (4) without the Dirac approximation does not give spin orbit fine structure at all! Both Feynman and Dirac look decidedly sea sick, or dippy in the waves. The Dirac approximation was a contrivance designed to give the right result, and is totally wrong because it gives H0 = 0. A new approach is needed for spin orbit fine structure. Some methods have been suggested in recent UFT papers.

338(4): A Simple and Accurate Theory of the Electron g Factor

Thursday, January 21st, 2016

This theory uses accurate relativistic quantum mechanics to show that the g factor of the electron is:

g = 1 + gamma

where gamma is the Lorentz factor. The latter is given by the de Broglie / Einstein equation:

gamma = h bar omega / (m c squared)
For a rest electron
g = 2

because of the de Broglie equation of the rest electron,

h bar omega0 = m c squared

For a rest electron in contact with the vacuum:

g = 2 + h bar omega(vacuum) / m c squared

= 2.002319314

so the vacuum energy per rest electron is

h bar omega(vacuum) = 0.002319314 m c squared

This theory makes quantum electrodynamics entirely obsolete, and also makes the Dirac theory itself obsolete, because the rigorous equation (4) without the Dirac approximation does not give spin orbit fine structure at all! Both Feynman and Dirac look decidedly sea sick, or dippy in the waves. The Dirac approximation was a contrivance designed to give the right result, and is totally wrong because it gives H0 = 0. A new approach is needed for spin orbit fine structure. Some methods have been suggested in recent UFT papers.

a338thpapernotes4.pdf

Daily Report 19/1/16

Thursday, January 21st, 2016

The equivalent of 163,284 printed pages was downloaded during the day (595.335 megabytes) from 3111 memory files downloaded (hits) and 619 distinct visits each averaging 7 pages of memory and 9 minutes, 3081 documents, an average of 53 printed pages per document during the day. Main spiders cnsat (China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 2927, Top ten items 1972, Collected Evans / Morris 1192, Collected scientometrics 356, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 287, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 285, Autobiography volumes one and two 220, F3(Sp) 162, UFT88 108, UFT311 108, Engineering Model 98, Evans Equations 84, UFT321 82, CEFE 66, Self charging inverter 52, Llais 50, Lindstrom Idaho lecture 20, Three world records by MWE 10, List of prolific authors 9, UFT313 84, UFT314 70, UFT315 67, UFT316 80, UFT317 32, UFT318 94, UFT319 65, UFT320 60, UFT322 61, UFT323 178, UFT324 53, UFT325 58, UFT326 229, UFT327 215, UFT328 234, UFT329 214, UFT330 207, UFT331 162, UFT332 175, UFT333 167, UFT334 166, UFT335 163, UFT336 57, UFT337 25 to date in January 2016. Louisiana State University UFT213; Starman carrier Estonia Englynion; IMAG University and Institute Consortium Grenoble experimental advantages of ECE theory, introduction to ECE, my page, UFT papers; EQ Education GCSE Learning Organization My Page; Intelekt Organization Ukraine weak points of the standard model of physics; University of Edinburgh UFT142, 147, 152, 167 and Spacetime Devices; University of Manchester UFT175 on the quantum Hamilton equations and refutation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for January 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

Link to Osamu Ide Video on www.aias.us

Wednesday, January 20th, 2016

By all means send a DVD. It may be best to send Horst a copy with the complete talk intact, then he can load it in to www.aias.us.

In a message dated 20/01/2016 16:43:29 GMT Standard Time, daphne@myad.jp writes:

Dear Dr. Evans, Dear Dr. Eckardt,

Thank you for uploading my DVD on AIAS site so quickly!!

I have just watched it on the site.

It is mostly OK. However the video and my speech sound were slipped.

And the result, the last words about three seconds were missed as Horst pointed.

The missed words are “The right meter is for measuring negative current”.

May I send an original version DVD to Dr. Evans or Dave Burleigh?

Sincerely,

Osamu

From: EMyrone@aol.com [mailto:EMyrone@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 9:07 PM
To: mail@horst-eckardt.de; daphne@myad.jp; dave@annexa.net; bo.lehnert@alfvenlab.kth.se; avanderm@du.edu; dblake@no10.x.gsi.gov.uk; pennbonvivant@yahoo.com; raydela@sbcglobal.net; corbis@bigpond.net.au; normanpage@comcast.net; fritzius@bellsouth.net; garethjohnevans@hotmail.co.uk; rpmc_6@hotmail.com; burleigh.personal@gmail.com; alexhillgtz@yahoo.com; ccefalas@eie.gr; simon.cliffy@googlemail.com; fdamador@comcast.net; steve.bannister@econ.utah.edu; graham.hall@gllm.ac.uk; alwyn.vandermerwe@du.edu; henryk.ratajczak@gmail.com; croca@fc.ul.pt; dwlindstrom@gmail.com; cr1460solarinc@gmail.com; sean@somewhere.ws; norpag@att.net; kp.phys@btinternet.com; simon@mrclifford.net; rob@rfmicrosystems.co.uk; thenarmis@yahoo.com; Alwyn.VanDerMerwe@du.edu; dendavis@aol.com; k.pendergast@btinternet.com; mcp358@gmail.com; russdavis1234@yahoo.com
Subject: Link to Osamu Ide Video on www.aias.us

Many thanks indeed!

In a message dated 20/01/2016 11:18:48 GMT Standard Time,

I converted the DVD to a mp4 file and will upload it to the website.
you can already watch it here:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_udwnQCjJaJem94WU5DT01tS00
(only visible for people knowing this link)

Osamu: the end of the DVD is very abrupt. Is this also the case in your original version? The length is 5:50 min.

Horst

Am 20.01.2016 um 09:08 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks, my postal address is Dr. M. W. Evans, 50 Rhyddwen Road, Craigcefnparc, Swansea, SA6 5RA, Wales, Great Britain. Would it be possible to send a copy of Dave Burleigh by mail for posting? If Horst has a copy he could post it from Muenich Thanks in anticipation. I think that it is possible to send a DVD by e mail, recently Doug Lindstrom sent the film “The Universe of Myron Evans” by e mail. Maybe Doug can advise on how you can distribute your DVD by e mail. Once on the www.aias.us blog and site it will go on to the San Francisco Internet Archive (www.archive.org)and be permanently archived. I think you are doing important work, and that UFT311 should win a Nobel Prize if the system is anywhere near fair minded.

In a message dated 19/01/2016 18:36:03 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Dear Dr. Evans,

I would like to send you a DVD of my experiment by postal mail.

It shows Ether engine running test and Degoichi experiment.

It is as same as I already sent to Horst and Frank Acland.

It was taken in Aug.2014. So it is not self-exciting test but over-unity test(nearly 400%) and takes 6 minutes to watch.

I would like you to put it on AIAS site if it is possible.

If it is OK I would like to have your postal mailing address.

Regards,

Osamu

P.S. I was failed in Shell GameChanger yesterday. So I have to change my method to find the fund.