Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

1) In Eq. (28) replace 4.147 by 3.704.
2) In Eq. (29) replace 62.63 by 55.94.
3) In Eq. (30) replace 125.26 by 111.88.

There were 2332 hits from 589 distinct visits, 30.2% spiders from baidu, google and MSN. Auto1 177, Auto2 63, Evans Equations 81 (English), numerous (Spanish), Book of Scientometrics 79, Autosonnets 11, Autoarchive 9, Englynion 9 so far in November 2013. Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science North Rhine Westphalian University of Technology UFT197; Department of Astronomy University of Illinois Urbana UFT213; Polytechnic Institute of New York Brooklyn UFT43; Department of Astronomy and Meteorology University of Barcelona Essay23(Sp); Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics University of Valencia UFT149; Univeristy of Poitiers general; Bandung Institute of Technology Indonesia UFT146, On the Development of Spacetime, major advances in UFT122, 131 and 132, Fundamental Errors in the Einstein Field Equation, ECE and Spacetime, Basic Error in the Einstein Field Equation, UFT145, 147, 111, Overview of ECE, UFT45, 46, 47,8, 4; Department of Mathematics Trinity College Dublin UFT88; Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur West Bengal UFT25; Mitsui-Kinzoku Corporation Japan levitron; Japanese National Institute for Materials Science UFT81; Department of Geophysics National Autonomous University of Mexico UFT166(Sp); Cass County Health System Iowa general; School of Natural and Mathematical Sciences King’s College London general. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2013.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: November 2013 – URL
Generated 28-Nov-2013 00:15 EST

There were 1795 hits from 471 distinct visits, 26.8% spiders from baidu, google, MSN and yandex. Auto1 172, Auto2 58, Autoarchive 9, Evans Equations 59, numerous (Spanish), Book of Scientometrics 78, CEFE 38, Autosonnets 11, Englynion 9, Second Book of Poetry 8 to date in November 2013. Catholic University Leuven levitron; Jacobs International University Bremen general; Physics Cologne University UFT81; Oberlin College UFT177; Portland State University Oregon UFT14; Renfe Operadore Railway Company Spain Essay 49 (Sp); University of Poitiers general; Peter Shepherd Meliusz Library Debrecen Hungary UFT111, ECE and Spacetime; Indira Ghandi Centre for Atomic Research India UFT170; Italian National Institute for Statistics Family History; Advanced Mathematics and Science Academy Charter School Marlboro Massachusetts Catastrophe for Cosmology Neglect of Torsion, UFT7; Silesian Data Center Autobiography Volume One; Physics Metu University Turkey UFT88; Selwyn College Cambridge UFT114; University of Wales Cardiff general; Exeter University UFT228. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2013.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: November 2013 – URL
Generated 27-Nov-2013 00:14 EST

I will develop this topic in UFT254, and will probably work on UFT253 and UFT254 at the same time. The initial idea, which I am just throwing around to begin with, is to use the mixed minimal prescription e phi + m capphi in the gravitational ECE law akin to the Coulomb law. A cosinusoidal electromagnetic driving term will then be used to produce resonance in capphi, which has the opposite sign to the usual – capphi of gravitation. I call this the counter gravitational scalar potential. The resonance would have the effect of reducing gravitation to zero. As usual in notes, initial ideas develop and change quite rapidly. I also wish to implement SCR in LENR theory to provide a source of energy to get over the Coulomb barrier. I started thing about this in UFT226 to UFT231, which had a lot of input from Horst and Doug.

Many thanks again for this check! The relevant term inside brackets of Eq. (10) should have been

x + x squared y

where x = 1 – 4 (v / c) squared , y = e phi / (m c squared)

without the brackets.

To date I investigated the first term x, so this error makes no difference to the rest of the note.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 26/11/2013 15:20:47 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Re: 253(7): Relativistic Corrections to ESR from the Fermion Equation

I cannot verify eq. (11). Eq. (10) seems to be correct, but comparing both terms below (E10 and E11) does not give zero:

EMyrone@aol.com hat am 26. November 2013 um 14:40 geschrieben:

It is shown that there are numerous new relativistic effects on ESR from the fermion equation. One of these terms is a quartic Pauli algebra as shown in Eq. (18), giving many new types of spectra. One of these is evaluated to give a novel term quadratic in the magnetic flux density. Its resonance frequency is given exactly without any adjustable parameters in Eq. (30). It is not very much smaller than the well known chemical shift, so should be observable quite easily. It is a novel kind of spin orbit coupling quadratic in the applied magnetic flux density. This is an illustration of real physics, in which a prediction is made that can be tested to high precision. The ghastly Higgs boson thing in contrast contains over twenty adjustables, and its theory is completely wrong, as shown in UFT225. In developing a LENR theory one should aim at this kind of precision and accuracy, starting with the fermion equation (or chiral Dirac equation).

Many thanks, there is an r cubed missing in the denominators of Eqs. (110) and (111). This adn other minor errata can be fixed in the final journal papers.

In a message dated 26/11/2013 08:49:36 GMT Standard Time, writes:

While assembling the tables for the spectral energies in papr 252 I came across an inconsistency of units. Eqs. 109-111 have the same leading factor but integrands have differnt units. The same holds for E13 (eq. 97). Is this a typo from taking over the results of the notes into the paper?

Horst

It is shown that there are numerous new relativistic effects on ESR from the fermion equation. One of these terms is a quartic Pauli algebra as shown in Eq. (18), giving many new types of spectra. One of these is evaluated to give a novel term quadratic in the magnetic flux density. Its resonance frequency is given exactly without any adjustable parameters in Eq. (30). It is not very much smaller than the well known chemical shift, so should be observable quite easily. It is a novel kind of spin orbit coupling quadratic in the applied magnetic flux density. This is an illustration of real physics, in which a prediction is made that can be tested to high precision. The ghastly Higgs boson thing in contrast contains over twenty adjustables, and its theory is completely wrong, as shown in UFT225. In developing a LENR theory one should aim at this kind of precision and accuracy, starting with the fermion equation (or chiral Dirac equation).

a253rdpapernotes7.pdf

I am forwarding these videos to the AIAS fellows for their analysis and comment, and posting on the blog. These phenomena may be akin to the one hundred thousand times amplification observed by the Alex Hill group in the laboratory and demonstrated to the Shelburne group at the U.S. Navy. I was also asked to explain that phenomenon, and that led to spin connection resonance theory. I recommend a literature search and study of the papers by Eckardt and Lindstrom on spin connection resonance. The papers by Eckardt and Lindstrom are published in Journal of Foundations of Physics and Chemistry adn are also publihsed on www.aias.us and other ECE sites. In my opinion, spin connection resonance occurs in all the ECE laws of electromagnetism, and all the ECE laws of gravitation. It is up to individual engineers to implement a design by use of simulation circuits as usual, i.e. to apply the general equations to a situation of interest to them. UFT107 is the most heavily studied paper on the implementation of spin connection resonance. The type of spin connection resonance that leads to high voltages as in lightning can be generated by a cosinal driving term as in UFT63. This is a small emf that is amplified by Euler Bernoulli resonance. The key question in LENR is to explain how the Coulomb barrier is overcome. It was shown in UFT226 to UFT231 that quantum tunnelling may be an adequate explanation, using the ordinary Schroedinger equatioin, a limit of the fermion equation. A possibility here is spin connection resonance worked in to quantum tunnelling theory. Eckardt and Lindstrom have also discussed the Maxwellian limit of the ECE equations, and have developed an infinite solenoid theory. They have also developed an LCR circuit which amplifies the Casimir effect. The ECE theory is based on Cartan geometry as you know, so a spin connection resonance in one part of the geometry, the field equations, will also affect the quantum equations, which are deduced from the same geometry. The quantum equations are deduced from the tetrad postulate and the field equations from the Cartan and Evans identities. In four dimensions the Hodge dual of a two form (or antisymmetric tensor) is another two form, so in four dimensions the Evans identity is simply an example of the Cartan identity. These thoughts may provide a link between lightning of this kind and low energy nuclear reactions. When I first proposed this theory in March 2003 it was very new and radical, but it has been checked literally tens of millions of times all over the world for a decade, so there is great confidence in the ideas. The mathematics of Cartan’s geometry are of course rigorously correct, having been checked in a multiple number of ways, not least by computer algebra. The latter must be tested against experimental data. This must be done with maximum possible precision in a carefully controlled laboratory experiment in which all aspects are known to all scientists. The enormous resonance spike seen by the Alex Hill group is not a small anomaly, but a huge effect. That is why Shelburne got very excited about it. The Alex Hill devices are routinely used in industry. There remains a need for AIAS to develop its own device from beginning to end, so we have all the data. In developing SCR I never had any data to go on, but formulated a theory that has generated a huge amount of interest. In so doing I risked being attacked for promoting pseudoscience and indeed I often was. However that phase is now long gone except among a few disgusting cranks who hide their identities. That is not science. The most promising seems to be the infinite solenoid.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 26/11/2013 05:12:17 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Sprite Lightning Videos

Dr Evans,

Attached are some short video clips from the PBS Nova program, “At The Edge of Space”, which shows the high altitude lightning “sprites” developing in slow motion.

The amazing thing, is that the ionized streamers show the release of synchronized bipolar charges. This cannot be accounted for by conventional ionization models (can it?). This is why these videos are so incredible.

There is something totally unknown, and unpredicted, happening 40 miles above the most powerful thunderstorms.

This is a great opportunity for ECE theorists to step forward, and come up with a testable model to explain the synchronized creation of bipolar ionized particles, from the SAME ionized streamer, and 40 miles above the original lightning bolt.

Maybe someone in the AIAS group will share my amazement at these videos?

Michael Jackson

Many thanks, I will forward these to the Fellows for a synopsis of their thoughts. I recall that Tesla carried out experiments such as these but did not give a theoretical explanation. The ECE explanation is contained in UFT63 (very heavily studied for about seven or eight years by now, and in developments of spin connection theory by Horst Eckardt and Douglas Lindstrom. Robert Cheshire has posted a very interesting broadcast on www.aias.us called “Nicola Who?” and there is a film “All about Tesla” in which Alex Hill and I appeared. The main LENR papers are UFT226 ff. These used quantum tunnelling theory in particles. In the atmosphere there would be molecules of water, nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide and pollutant particles. I also did some work on the possibility of spin connection resonance catalysing a quantum tunnelling process.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 26/11/2013 03:57:58 GMT Standard Time
Subj: Sprite Lightning amazing video – LENR in action???

Hello, Dr Evans,

I recently saw the PBS Nova program, which showed high speed, closeup video of “sprite” lightning. This amazing, strange, bipolar, effect, coupled with “terrestrial gamma ray flashes”, which come from ordinary lightning storms, makes me wonder if lightning is not actually a LENR reaction in the atmosphere.

Here is the link to a short clip of sprite lightning (the Nova video was much better, but is not on youtube): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn0My2ivh2U

The sprites happen from 10 to 60 miles high, far above any thunderheads, or water vapor.

Here is an article about the terrestrial gamma ray flashes: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/apr/17/dark-lightning-sheds-light-on-gamma-ray-mystery

I have never “bought” the conventional explanation for lightning, as there is too much conductivity, in the form of water droplets and vapor, for “influence” (like a wimshurst generator) to create the mega voltages. I still think some kind of spin connection induction is happening, and the sprites may be a result of LENR that is triggered by a gamma ray pulse.

If your LENR models could account for sprite lightning, that would be another great contribution, and a nice wake-up call to the dead-end standard modellers.

Regards,

Michael Jackson

There were 2153 hits from 573 distinct visits, 21.1% spiders from baidu, google, MSN and yandex. Auto1 168, Auto2 57, Evans Equations 58 (English), numerous (Spanish), Book of Scientometircs 76, CEFE 37, Autosonnets 11, Autoarchive 9, Englynion 8. Rovira and Virgili University Tarragona general; Mathematics University of Waterloo UFT88; Secheron Corporation Czech Republic general; Oberlin College UFT177; Ohio State University Proof 1; Samford University general; Houston University general; University of Michigan Flint Misconceptions Concerning Electromagnetism; National College of Engineering Brest Brittany AIAS Fellows; Pasteur Institute Overview of ECE Theory, Awards won by the Aberystwyth Group, UFT1, UFT13, Equations Flowcharts, Staff, Table of Differences, Major Advances in UFT 122, 131, 132, UFT122, UFT142, CV; University of Paris general; United States Brookhaven National Laboratory UFT205; Trinity College Dublin UFT88; RIKEN Institute of Physical and Chemical Research Japan UFT63; Pentagraph Associates AIAS staff, B3, overview, Table of Differences, Experimental Advantages of ECE, University of Panama UFT140 (Sp); Chemistry Coimbra University Portugal Essay 69; University of Wales Cardiff UFT239; University of Durham UFT146; Imperial College London UFT99; Luton University UFT169. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for November 2013.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: November 2013 – URL
Generated 26-Nov-2013 00:19 EST