Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:58 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: Plane Polar Coordinates
| This is because the coordinates in the plane polar system are themselves dynamic, as in Marion and Thornton circa pp. 27 ff. The Newtonian ideas are valid only for motion in a straight line in space and Newton implicitly assumed static coordinates (in modern language). As in the revised Note 234(3) just sent over, the real reason why an orbit is stable emerges from pure geometry. There is a balance of forces. Some remarks in note 234(4) should be revised in an obvious way to take account of the revised note 234(3), this will be done in the final paper. This can be co authored as usual, and the idea is to apply it to cosmology and LENR. The main conclusion so far is that the Minkowski method produces a combination of forces for any orbit, including galaxies. This is the real reason why orbits are stable, in my opinion. In the miscalled Schwarzschild metric the linear momentum is not a costant of motion as you know, but it is a constant of motion in the Minkowski method. The total linear momentum, vector p, is conserved.
In a message dated 17/12/2012 13:25:04 GMT Standard Time, writes:
It is interesting that the special central symmetry defines a force. The Minkowski space is the same when described by cartesian or spherical coordinates, but different symmetries are considered. The choice of a coordinate system (symmetry) should not change physical properties but this seems to be the case here.
Horst
Verschickt: Mo, 17 Dez 2012 1:57 pm
Betreff: 234(4): Comparison of Minkowski Method with Classical Kinematics
The classical kinematic method was first developed in UFT196, and in this note it is compared with the elegant and simple Minkowski cosmology being developed now. The conclusion is that the classical kinematics must be abandoned in favour of the simplest type of relativistic kinematics, valid for ALL orbits. This note developed into a long essay with equations, a kind of technical essay. The idea of a centrally directed force of attraction being “counterbalanced” by a centrifugal force is hopelessly incorrect. It is replaced by the original idea of general relativity, but with the metric shorn down to its simplest form – the Minkowski metric. In general relativity an orbit is a path along spacetime, it is not caused by the attraction between M and m, as is well known. The same Minkowski metric was used in UFT231 for LENR, so this method can also be used for LENR, as well as for cosmology.
|
View article…
This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 18th, 2012 at 4:12 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.