Prof. G. Evans has rightly assessed the decrepitude of the Standard Model. Unfortunately the Standard Modellers are, I think, unlikely to accept the demise of their theories with grace and honesty, because they perceive that as injurious to their reputations and their egos, and perhaps also to their jobs.
Consequently, they will, I feel, cling together, like bunches of grapes, in an attempt to protect their interests. Scientific truth does not enter into their equations. Here is another example of their methods.From: "Andrzej Krasiñski" <ADDRESS HIDDEN>
Yesterday morning I sent a copy of my latest paper (Ricc = 0) to all those on the "Challenge" list in relation to funding of the AIGO (www.geocities.com/theometria/challenge.html). It is a long list. I received 2 replies. Here they are:
To: "Stephen Crothers" <ADDRESS HIDDEN>Subject: Re: Ricc = 0 violates Einstein's Principle ofEquivalenceDate: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:32:12 +0100
Your mails will be automatically qualified as spam.Discussing with someone who refuses to understand ispointless. Andrzej Krasinski
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:30:44 +1100From: "Mike Ford" <ADDRESS HIDDEN>
Subject: Re: Ricc = 0 violates Einstein's Principle ofEquivalenceTo: "Stephen Crothers" <ADDRESS HIDDEN>
Take me off this mailing list.
Now neither Krazinski nor Ford made any submission to the "Challenge" concerning the funding of the AIGO and now offer no reason for my arguments being erroneous. I think Krazinski is the pot calling the kettle black, since it is he and his crowd who refuse to see reason, but attempt to deflect the issues by telling me that I'm the one who won't see reason - very convenient for the Standard Modellers, I'm sure. Evidently these shysters think that Ricc = 0 does not violate Einstein's 'Principle of Equivalence'. Well, that is nonsense, and pretty easy to see. Ricc = 0 excludes all matter and energy from the gravitational field, but Einstein's 'Principle' requires that a freely falling inertial frame must render the laws of Special Relativity. That means that mass and energy must be present in that falling frame. But Ricc = 0 has already excluded that possibility by definition. Contra hype!