Feed: Dr. Myron Evans
Posted on: Thursday, December 22, 2011 7:34 AM
Author: metric345
Subject: 203(1): Checking the Assumptions of UFT202
| This note checks the assumptions of UFT202, and they are found to be correct. The quantized energy E = h bar omega of one photon deflected by the sun is orders of magnitude greater than its maxmum orbital kinetic and potential energies in the Newtonian limit. Similarly the maximum quantized angular momentum h bar of one photon is orders of magnitude greater than its maximum orbital angular momentum. This is a calculation of key importance to physics, so its assumptions have to be checked carefully. In the visible range and higher the photon mass of ten power minus fifty seven kilograms does not depend on frequency, so it behaves as a particle. At lower frequencies the computer solution by co author of UFT203 Horst Eckardt will show that m starts to depend on frequency, so it is not entirely particulate in nature, more undulatory or wave like. This makes perfect sense. The assumption made in UFT155 was based on the Einstein theory, which has now been discarded completely as being incorrect in many ways. The calculation can be repeated for a Planck distribution of photons in a beam, and this can be done next. CERN visits our work at AIAS quite regularly (e.g. yesterday) so must know that its theory is entirely obsolete. I was told at UNCC that the first determination of photon mass would get an immediate Nobel Prize, so let’s wait and see. The photon mass has been determined directly from observation of the conical section orbit, in this case a hyperbola. The photon is deflected by a very tiny amount from a straight line, the famous 1.75 seconds of arc. There is a “velvet revolution” going on in physics as described by Michael Jackson, because the deflection of light is now known to have nothing to do with Einstein’s ideas. The calculation of the photon mass is very simple, so surely the time has come when the dogmatists accept very simple, but very profound, science. The photon mass is in line with other estimates, which give it as less than a certain amount. For the first time it is now known to be ten power minus fifty seven kilograms at visible frequencies or higher when the photon becomes particulate (Newton’s corpuscle of light). The entire U(1) sector symmetry of the standard model is refuted in yet another way, and photon mass means B(3) and vice versa as first pointed out by Prof. Jean-Pierre Vigier in a letter to me circa January 1993 in the historical source documents on this site. Vigier worked with Prof. Louis de Broglie for many years. Copenhagen is refuted in yet another way, the photon is both a particle and a wave, de Broglie’s own interpretation. As far as I know this was also Einstein’s own view.
|
