The physics Nobel Prize Committee has been unable to reply to these criticisms, which were also sent to CERN. The latter was also unable to reply. More accurately they probably did not read the criticisms and refused to reply. So the funding for this type of behaviour must be stopped. They know that the claim of the Higgs boson is groundless, and based on mathematical error and dogmatism. Accordingly I call on the entire ECE community of scientists and engineers to reject this year’s physics Nobel prize. The chemistry prize on the other hand seems quite reasonable, but to single out one or two scientists for a Nobel prize has become an entirely meaningless process. The majority dissenting opinion is that the Higgs boson is pseudoscience. The Higgs boson does not exist in nature. The Nobel prize committee also refused to look at the book of scientometrics sent to it with these criticisms, a book which proves beyond reasonable doubt that there there is a complete rejection of standard physics.
To Physics Nobel Prize Committee:
I agree with Axel Westrenius and with many responsible scientists who have refuted the existence of the Higgs boson, many times, in many ways, for many years. You have a policy of not corresponding with anyone about Nobel Prizes so I make this in to an open letter that will reach thousands of concerned colleagues worldwide. Axel Westrenius sent you UFT225 on www.aias.us which refutes the GWS sector of the standard model. The calculations were checked with computer algebra. The mathematics behind GWS were shown to be complete nonsense, so there have been machinations that have produced a new kind of sausage meat. In addition it is well known that Higgs did not infer the Higgs mechanism alone. His h index is only eleven and his contributions have been minor. Some other points:
1) My inference of the B(3) field in 1992 means that the photon has mass. The B(3) field developed into the ECE theory which has attracted tens of millions of readings off www.aias.us in the last decade and will continue to do so indefinitely. This means a complete rejection of standard physics. Attached for your information is an overview book of interest in ECE. It is studied by all the best universities in the world. There are now 251 UFT papers, all in Google Scholar, all of which refute the Higgs boson by implication of photon mass.
2) The Higgs mechanism is a deus ex machina intended to give mass to massless particles. This is like patching up a tyre with hot air. The particle is not massless to begin with. A massless photon results in all kinds of well known difficulties, notably the E(2) little group, a two dimensional spacetime, and also results in muldiple flaws in Einsteinian general relativity as in UFT150B on www.aias.us and many hugely popular essay broadcasts of my work by Robert Cheshire.
3) So in summary only the Nobel Prize committee believes in the Higgs boson, which is the result of laundering data and using so many adjustables that you could produce any result you wanted. The Nobel Prize has been orchestrated therefore at the cost of tens of billions, and is of no use to humankind at all. It will probably help tip Europe into a great depression.
4) You have breached the terms of the Will of Alfred Nobel. A Nobel Prize must be given for the betterment of humankind, not for a wildly expensive fantasy. There are thousands of physicists worthier of the award, which has therefore been devalued to insignificance. There may evolve an international movement to stop the profligate waste of public money at CERN and I call on the British Government to withdraw from CERN. The UFT225 paper was sent to CERN but it was ignored most cynically. This is a sure sign that CERN is ungoverend and that it funds itself. It must therefore be subject to a rigorously impartial international inquiry.
Myron Evans
Dr. M. W. Evans, Armiger, Civil List Pensioner, D. Sc., Ph. D., B. Sc. (Wales)
AIAS President
www.aias.us
U. S. Dual Citizen.In a message dated 27/10/2013 02:33:47 GMT Standard Time, writes:
Dear Nobel Committee for Physics members,
By way of introduction; I am a life long layman student of physics, now 83. I emigrated with my family to Australia from Malmö in Sweden in early 1986, and have kept following developments in theoretical physics ever since.
The purpose of this message is to draw your attention to the work of several ex academia physicists which appear to cast very serious doubts about the validity of the reasons for awarding this years prize in Physics for the Higgs boson. Several papers of particular relevance are attached for you.
I have the general impression that the number of layman students of physics like me in the general public is rapidly growing and that there is increasing alarm amongst us about where academic physics is heading. Alfred Nobel himself is obviously unable to protest, but we, the Hoi Polloi, may soon refuse to foot the bill.
Best regards,
Axel Westrenius