Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

In a message dated 17/12/2012 10:51:43 GMT Standard Time, writes:

Are you sure that the second derivative of r vanishes in eq.(6)? The conservation of momentum (8) is for the VECTOR r.
Eq.(7) would mean that

r dot = const,

but for an ellipse r dot changes sign in an orbit and cannot be constant. Nevertheless we have

bold r dot = const

because the momentum is shifted between radial and angular components.

Horst

Verschickt: So, 16 Dez 2012 3:36 pm
Betreff: 234(3): Description of any Orbit with Minkowski Metric and Force

This note calculates the Minkowski force (22) of any observable orbit using only the Minkowski metric (32) and no other concept. This cosmology is preferred to all other cosmologies by Ockham’s Razor. It can be reduced to a Newtonian limit but at the expense of introducing other concepts such as “attraction” and “potential energy”. In this Minkowski method any orbit is due to the metric. This is similar to the idea of general relativity but always simpler and therefore always preferred by Ockhams’ Razor. It is preferred to all cosmologies based on a spacetime more complicated than the Minkowski spacetime. It eliminates big bang, black holes, dark matter and other incorrect ideas of the old physics in favour of the simplest description consistent with all the data. It may be used to rationalize any orbit from the solar system to galactic and supergalactic. This Minkowski method differs from more complicated theories in that the radial part of the total relativistic linear momentum is a constant of motion. This eliminates the idea of the Hooke Newton inverse square law, which is a more complicated description of orbits than this one. The force law is not that of Einsteinian general relativity, it is a “centripetal force” but with negative sign.