Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

Nominations for Nobel Prizes

I was informed on 17th June 2009 by Richard Amoroso, Chair of various Vigier Conferences, that: "I have heard in direct conversation from someone on the Physics Nobel Prize Committee that Myron Evans should win a Nobel Prize for B(3) theory. I assume that this means that Myron Evans has been nominated for a Physics Nobel Prize more than once. In 1993 I was told by Mansel Davies that I should win a Nobel Prize for B(3). He was a chemistry Nobel Prize advisor and nominated Enrico Clementi, I. B. M. Fellow, for a Nobel Prize. I have been informed many times by others that I should win a Nobel Prize in physics or chemistry. With the complete acceptance of B(3) and ECE among the avant garde of physics, I assume that these nominations will continue if anyone is given a fair oportunity of nomination. The person with whom Amoroso had a conversation was almost certainly Bo Lehnert, a member of the Royal Swedish Academy and able to nominate me himself as a Member of the Royal Swedish Academy. Bo Lehnert was a referee for my Civil List Pension along with Alwyn van der Merwe and the late John B. Hart. With the sad death of Stephen Hawking in March 2018, the dogmatic grip on physics has loosened. For example the reason why gravitational or Hawking radiation was never observed from black holes is that neither Hawking radiation nor black holes can exist because they are based on incorrect geometry. They have been refuted by ECE and ECE2, the successor theories to EGR. This has been described recently in the international and avant garde "Nexus" magazine. Einstein was nominated sixty one times before he was awarded a Nobel prize for the explanation of the photoelectric effect in terms of photons. The Committee and Academy never awarded him a Nobel prize for relativity.

Fwd: Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

Pleasure! Your graphics and computations in the Maxima protocols are vitally important for the advancement of science. The hamiltonian method dH / dt = 0 appears to be original to this note, and has some resemblance to the UFT paper on the force equation of quantum mechanics, now a classic of physics (UFT177). Our paper on the refutation of the Heisenberg indeterminacy (UFT175) has also become a classic, as the "Nexus" magazine records. The hamiltonian method is of course basic to quantum mechanics and on the classical level is a most elegant demonstration of the way in which total conserved energy converts to force. This demonstrates the tremendous depth of ability and great elegance of Lagrange, Euler and Hamilton.

Date: Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

Many thanks for working this out. It is very interesting how the Lagrangian results can be obtained from the Hamiltonian. I believe I never say such a derivation.

Horst

Am 25.08.2018 um 12:44 schrieb Myron Evans:

Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

This note writes out the protocol sent over by Horst yesterday and gives multiple cross checks for correctness by adding an analysis using the hamiltonian. It is found that the theory is perfectly self consistent. The precession in the rotating frame is omega sub 1 T and the precession in the observer frame is – omega sub 1 T, where T is the time taken for one orbit. The protocol solves Eqs. (13) and (14) simultaneously to give the precessing orbit and the detailed dynamics of r and phi’ in the observer frame. The Lagrangian and hamiltonian methods give exactly the same results. This theory is the classical limit of the ECE2 covariant theory, in which the force depends on the spin connection and isotropically averaged vacuum fluctuations of the same type used in the precise theory of the radiative corrections. All 412 papers and books of ECE theory are rigorously self consistent and cross checked in hundreds of different ways, using computer algebra as in this Maxima protocol distributed yesterday, checked by different co authors and myslef and of course tested against experimental data whenever possible. The rotation of the frame is caused by spacetime torsion.

Fwd: Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

Pleasure! Your graphics and computations in the Maxima protocols are vitally important for the advancement of science. The hamiltonian method dH / dt = 0 appears to be original to this note, and has some resemblance to the UFT paper on the force equation of quantum mechanics, now a classic of physics (UFT177). Our paper on the refutation of the Heisenberg indeterminacy (UFT175) has also become a classic, as the "Nexus" magazine records. The hamiltonian method is of course basic to quantum mechanics and on the classical level is a most elegant demonstration of the way in which total conserved energy converts to force. This demonstrates the tremendous depth of ability and great elegance of Lagrange, Euler and Hamilton.

Date: Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method
To: Myron Evans <myronevans123>

Many thanks for working this out. It is very interesting how the Lagrangian results can be obtained from the Hamiltonian. I believe I never say such a derivation.

Horst

Am 25.08.2018 um 12:44 schrieb Myron Evans:

Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

This note writes out the protocol sent over by Horst yesterday and gives multiple cross checks for correctness by adding an analysis using the hamiltonian. It is found that the theory is perfectly self consistent. The precession in the rotating frame is omega sub 1 T and the precession in the observer frame is – omega sub 1 T, where T is the time taken for one orbit. The protocol solves Eqs. (13) and (14) simultaneously to give the precessing orbit and the detailed dynamics of r and phi’ in the observer frame. The Lagrangian and hamiltonian methods give exactly the same results. This theory is the classical limit of the ECE2 covariant theory, in which the force depends on the spin connection and isotropically averaged vacuum fluctuations of the same type used in the precise theory of the radiative corrections. All 412 papers and books of ECE theory are rigorously self consistent and cross checked in hundreds of different ways, using computer algebra as in this Maxima protocol distributed yesterday, checked by different co authors and myslef and of course tested against experimental data whenever possible. The rotation of the frame is caused by spacetime torsion.

413(3).pdf

413(3).pdf

Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

This note writes out the protocol sent over by Horst yesterday and gives multiple cross checks for correctness by adding an analysis using the hamiltonian. It is found that the theory is perfectly self consistent. The precession in the rotating frame is omega sub 1 T and the precession in the observer frame is – omega sub 1 T, where T is the time taken for one orbit. The protocol solves Eqs. (13) and (14) simultaneously to give the precessing orbit and the detailed dynamics of r and phi’ in the observer frame. The Lagrangian and hamiltonian methods give exactly the same results. This theory is the classical limit of the ECE2 covariant theory, in which the force depends on the spin connection and isotropically averaged vacuum fluctuations of the same type used in the precise theory of the radiative corrections. All 412 papers and books of ECE theory are rigorously self consistent and cross checked in hundreds of different ways, using computer algebra as in this Maxima protocol distributed yesterday, checked by different co authors and myslef and of course tested against experimental data whenever possible. The rotation of the frame is caused by spacetime torsion.

a413thpapernotes.pdf

Note 413(4): Writing Out the Protocol and hamiltonian Method

This note writes out the protocol sent over by Horst yesterday and gives multiple cross checks for correctness by adding an analysis using the hamiltonian. It is found that the theory is perfectly self consistent. The precession in the rotating frame is omega sub 1 T and the precession in the observer frame is – omega sub 1 T, where T is the time taken for one orbit. The protocol solves Eqs. (13) and (14) simultaneously to give the precessing orbit and the detailed dynamics of r and phi’ in the observer frame. The Lagrangian and hamiltonian methods give exactly the same results. This theory is the classical limit of the ECE2 covariant theory, in which the force depends on the spin connection and isotropically averaged vacuum fluctuations of the same type used in the precise theory of the radiative corrections. All 412 papers and books of ECE theory are rigorously self consistent and cross checked in hundreds of different ways, using computer algebra as in this Maxima protocol distributed yesterday, checked by different co authors and myslef and of course tested against experimental data whenever possible. The rotation of the frame is caused by spacetime torsion.

a413thpapernotes.pdf