This is very useful because this paper introduced the Evans torsion identity and should be read with UFT88, 99, 313 and 354 (which is already showing signs of being another classic). UFT354 was mainly the work of Dr. Douglas Lindstrom, and was developed numerically by Dr. Horst Eckardt. These papers entirely refute the Einstein theory, which is well known to be empty of meaning. Stephen Crothers takes the Einstein theory to the alley of a thousand dustbins in chapter nine of PECE, shortly to be incorporated into the preprint.

CC: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 30/08/2016 04:54:17 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Spanish version of UFT 109

Posted today

Dave

On 8/28/2016 10:26 AM, Alex Hill (ET3M) wrote:

Hello Dave,

Please find enclosed the Spanish version of UFT 109, for posting.

Thanks.

Regards,

The equivalent of 129,038 printed pages was downloaded (470.471 megabytes) from 2,037 downloaded memory files (hits) and 554 distinct visits, each averaging 3.3 memory pages and 8 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 63.35 for the day, main spiders cnsat(China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 1889, Top ten 1849, Evans / Morris 924(est), Collected scientometrics 582(est), F3(Sp) 516, Barddoniaeth / Collected poetry 418, Evans Equations 329, Principles of ECE 315, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 294(est), Autobiography volumes one and two 274, Collected Proofs 256, UFT88 129, Engineering Model 121, UFT311 104, PECE 108, CEFE 82, Self charging inverter 45, UFT321 42, Llais 36, Lindstrom Idaho lecture 27, List of prolific authors 20, UFT313 38, UFT314 41, UFT315 45, UFT316 41, UFT317 32, UFT318 54, UFT319 56, UFT320 43, UFT322 57, UFT323 52, UFT324 57, UFT325 60, UFT326 42, UFT327 29, UFT328 43, UFT329 52, UFT330 38, UFT331 46, UFT332 44, UFT333 33, UFT334 37, UFT335 46, UFT336 39, UFT337 33, UFT338 43, UFT339 42, UFT340 38, UFT341 39, UFT342 29, UFT343 33, UFT344 46, UFT345 44, UFT346 50, UFT347 47, UFT348 61, UFT349 68, UFT351 62, UFT352 84, UFT353 70, UFT354 61, UFT355 24 to date in August 2016. Iparadigms California UFT139; Mechanical Engineering University of California Berkeley UFT142; International Peace Bureau Namibia UFT158; Fitzwilliam College Cambridge UFT166; University of Edinburgh UFT145, 147. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for August 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

These are the simultaneous differential equations (2) to (4) in general, and with the assumption (5) reduce to three independent equations (8) to (10). Eq. (10) looks interesting and could be soluble analytically for v sub Z as a function of Z. The boundary conditions chosen for Eq. (10) will be critically important.

a356thpapernotes6.pdf

Can this equation be solved with a partial differential equation package? It looks like an interesting non linear differential equation to which there may be an analytical solution. In order to eliminate the complexities of the spherical polar coordinate system I can set up the problem in the Cartesian system. In any case we have already proven the method of UFT356 and there is a great deal of interest in the latest UFT papers as you can see from this morning’s report. It would be interesting to model boundary conditions on an actual circuit such as that of UFT311, which is the ultimate aim of the research.

This looks very interesting, and can be used in the final paper.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2016 21:29:31 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 356(2): Velocity Field from a Current Loop Magnetic Field

The vector potential has only a phi component, dependent on r and theta. This has been plottet in the protocol as v[phi](theta) for some fixed r values, all constants set to unity. The potential is highest in the XY plane as expected.
I also computed a component E[phi] according to note 356(4). Since in 356(2) this is a pure magnetostatic problem it is

E[phi] = 0.

This could be different for more complicated geometries.

Horst

Am 26.08.2016 um 14:04 schrieb EMyrone:

In this case the result is analytical, Eq. (11), and it can be graphed in three dimensions in spherical polar coordinates.

356(2).pdf

The expression for the divergence in spherical polar coordinates is the same from this Harvard site and VAPS, so that is a useful check. so Eqs. (1) to (8) of the note have been checked as correct. This means that Eqs. (9) to (15) of the note are correct. The protocol also seems to be correct.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/08/2016 20:44:22 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 356(4): Spacetime Velocity Field Induced by a Static Electric Field

The divergence and gradient terms in spherical coordinates are different, see
http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic970148.files/Spherical_coord.pdf

The (v*grad) v term then reads for two arbitrary vector functions a and b:
(a*grad) b =

The diff. eqs. with full angular dependenced are o11-o13 in the protocol. For pure r dependence, the results are o15-o17.
This gives constant solutions for v[theta] and v[phi]. These will only be different from zero if a constant background potential is considered, for example an overlay of constant aether flow.
The solution for component v[r] is o20/o21. For %c=0, this is of type 1/sqrt(r), not of 1/r as expected. This needs to be clarified.

Horst

Am 27.08.2016 um 12:55 schrieb EMyrone:

In spherical polar coordinates this is found by solving Eqs. (13) to (15) simultaneously. In general, the velocity field has a very interesting structure in three dimensions. The simultaneous numerical solution of Eqs. (13) to (15) also gives the spacetime velocity field set up by a static gravitational field g (the acceleration due to gravity). This entirely original type of velocity field exists in a spacetime defined as a fluid. The spacetime can also be called an “aether”, or “vacuum”. Any boundary conditions can be used. A magnetic and gravitomagnetic field also set up aether velocity fields.

356(4).pdf

OK thanks, it looks as if some analytical approximation is needed to produce independent equations. I will look in to this.

Sent: 28/08/2016 19:38:55 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 356(3): Electric Component of the Plane Wave

The diff. eqs. (6-8) cannot be solved analytically by Maxima because it cannot handle coupled diff. eqs. Perhaps Mathematica can do that. For the plane wave solution see my other email.

Horst

Am 27.08.2016 um 10:48 schrieb EMyrone:

This is the statement of the problem in general. It consists of solving simultaneously three non linear differential equations in three unknowns, v sub X, v sub Y and v sub Z, for any boundary conditions. These are Eqs. (6), (7) and (8). For a plane wave the electric field components are given by Eqs. (9), (10) and (11). I find this line of research to be very interesting, because as suggested by Horst, any electric or magnetic or electromagnetic field in material matter sets up a velocity field in spacetime, defined as a fluid. This is entirely original research based on ECE2 unified field theory. In precise analogy, any gravitational field sets up a fluid flow in spacetime, and any weak or strong nuclear field. This is true form the domain of elementary particles to galactic clusters.

The equivalent of 136,967 printed pages was downloaded during the day (499.379 megabytes) from 2,198 downloaded memory files (hits) and 534 distinct visits each averaging 3.1 memory pages and 11 minutes, printed pages to hits ratio of 62.31 for the day, main spiders cnsat(China), google, MSN and yahoo. Collected ECE2 1859, Top ten 1749, Evans / Morris 891(est), Collected scientometrics 582, F3(Sp) 448, Barddoniaeth / Collected Poetry 406, Evans Equations 355, Principles of ECE 310, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 294(est), Autobiography volumes one and two 265, Collected Proofs 253, UFT88 127, Engineering Model 110, PECE 107, UFT311 103, CEFE 80, Self charging inverter 45, UFT321 41, Llais 31, Lindstrom Idaho Lecture 27, Three world records by MWE 23, List of prolific authors 19, UFT313 36, UFT314 40, UFT315 44, UFT316 39, UFT317 31, UFT318 53, UFT319 55, UFT320 41, UFT322 57, UFT323 51, UFT324 66, UFT325 59, UFT326 42, UFT327 29, UFT328 43, UFT329 51, UFT330 36, UFT331 46, UFT332 44, UFT333 33, UFT334 37, UFT335 46, UFT336 38, UFT337 33, UFT338 33, UFT339 41, UFT340 38, UFT341 39, UFT342 29, UFT343 33, UFT344 45, UFT345 42, UFT346 50, UFT347 46, UFT348 60, UFT349 68, UFT351 60, UFT352 84, UFT353 67,UFT354 55, UFT355 19 to date in August 2016. Iowa State University general; University of California Irvine UFT88; University of Jember Indonesia general; University of Edinburgh UFT144, 146, 167. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for August 2016.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 401 Unauthorized error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

OK good, the velocity fields have interesting patterns, even for the simplest case of a static electric field or gravitational field.

In a message dated 28/08/2016 10:51:05 GMT Daylight Time, mail@horst-eckardt.de writes:

I will look into this tonight, we have a meeting of the Munich group today.
Horst

Am 28.08.2016 um 11:37 schrieb EMyrone:

This is a particular solution of Note 356(4), using the assumption (1), that the components of the velocity field v in spherical polar coordinates are independent variables. This gives the non linear partial differential equation (7) and Eqs. (5) and (6) for the phi and theta components. The same analysis applies to the gravitational field g, which sets up a velocity field in spacetime.

This is a particular solution of Note 356(4), using the assumption (1), that the components of the velocity field v in spherical polar coordinates are independent variables. This gives the non linear partial differential equation (7) and Eqs. (5) and (6) for the phi and theta components. The same analysis applies to the gravitational field g, which sets up a velocity field in spacetime.

a356thpapernotes5.pdf