This is good news, UFT107 remains a very popular paper, written by Franklin, Horst and myself. Franklin also typeset several volumes of “Generally Covariant Unified Field Theory”, (Abramis 2005 onwards in seven volumes) a “best reader” in open source format via the papers on www.aias.us. I suggest a discussion of UFT311 and of methods of building AIAS devices using energy from spacetime. The LENR papers UFT226 ff. caused a great stir when they were first published and the Faraday disk papers are all “best readers”. The new generation of scientists and engineers obviously find these papers to be intensely interesting.

In a message dated 30/05/2015 02:26:49 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Doug,

This is a happy coincidence, I will see you there at the conference. I’ve been planning to go and I have just registered. It will be good to meet you in person.

Regards,
Franklin Amador, PE
Electrical Engineer
AIAS Fellow

Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 6:07:05 AM
Subject: Re: Ninety Minute Presentation by Dr. Douglas Lindstrom

Thanks
Doug​

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 3:43 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

Agreed, I am certain that Doug will do an excellent job.

In a message dated 29/05/2015 11:29:18 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Doug, this is an impressive invitation, you have a 90 min time slot, that is a lot. Directly after you, John Bedini is scheduled, you can present some of the result from our Bedini paper (although it is agreed today that the Bedini machine is not overunity). That would be a good comprehensive point.

Horst

Am 28.05.2015 um 15:25 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks, I am sure they will go well adn I have posted them on the blog.

To: emyrone
Sent: 28/05/2015 13:47:03 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: energy conference

​Myron

Here are the links to the conference in Idaho that I will be presenting at in July.

http://energyscienceconference.com/energy-conference-schedule/2015-schedule/

http://energyscienceconference.com/speaker-bio-talk-description/2015-speakers/

The conference organizer gave the okay to post them.

Thanks
Doug

This classic paper by M. W. Evans and H. Eckardt is currently being read at the rate of 3,257 times a year and is the definitive refutation of the Einstein field equation. It should be read with the definitive proofs on www.aias.us that null torsion means no Einsteinian gravitation, these are being read 2,204 times a year. UFT88 has been developed gradually into UFT313 – UFT315, already being read 1,730 times a year and newly posted. The definitive refutation of the Higgs boson is the B(3) field, discovered at Cornell in November 1991 and nominated many times for the various big prizes. The definitive refutation of the electroweak theory is UFT225, currently being read 419 times a year. This paper shows that electroweak theory is mathematical nonsense. The Evans Morris papers refute several aspects of optics and spectroscopy in the standard physics, and are being read at the rate of 6,016 times a year. They are UFT 278 – 280, 289 – 291, 300, 304, 306, 308 – 310 and 312 in English and Spanish. They also define a severe test of the quantum theory. The Maxwell Heaviside (MH) theory is refuted by the experimental proof in UFT311 of the existence of the spin connection, and MH is also refuted de facto by the development of B(3) into a generally covariant unified field theory, ECE theory. The B(3) field implies finite photon mass, which refutes many aspects of the standard theory, including the Higgs boson. The scientometrics are being read 4,975 times a year and prove that entire professions reject the standard model and its system of administration. All the metrics of the Einstein field equation are incorrect because the equation is based on an incorrect equation of geometry, as UFT88 shows. So the fantasies of big bang, black holes and so on fade into meaningless nonsense. The Crothers refutations show that the solutions of the Einstein field equation are incorrect. So the standard literature contains incorrect solutions of an incorrect equation. There are only a few aspects of the old physics left, for example the Schroedinger equation, but this will also be refuted if the experimental tests proposed in the Evans Morris papers fail. All these failures of the old theory have been replaced by theory based on ECE. For example the x theory of 2014 does all that the old Einsteinian theory does, to the same level of accuracy, and also succeeds in describing whirlpool galaxies.

There were respectively 2275 and 2134 files downloaded from 387 and 351 reading sessions. Main spiders from baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans Morris papers 445, Scientometrics 368, Auto1 272, Auto2 91, F3(Sp) 272, UFT88 241, Evans Equations 176 (numerous Spanish), Proofs that null torsion means no Einsteinian gravitation 163, Engineering Model 140, Principles of ECE 132, Eckardt Lindstrom papers 129, UFT311 74, UFT313 67, CEFE 59, Englynion 58 (first book of poetry); UFT314 34, UFT315 27, Autobiography Sonnets 27 (second book of poetry) to date in May 2015. Helmholtz Foundation Juelich Research Centre UFT175; Cornell University UFT239; University of the Basques Research Centre UFT213; Electronics Engineering Technical University of Madrid UFT170 (Sp); University of Oulu Finland LCR Resonant; University of Poitiers general; Savoie University Mont Blanc France UFT8; S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences India UFT41; Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems of the Italian National Research Council (CNR) Bologna Italy UFT8, UFT147; Physics Tohoku University Japan UFT85; Regional Joint Computer Network of Education, Science and Culture of St. Petersburgh Russia UFT75; City of Tuapse Russian Federation general; Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for May 2015.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

That should have been, “new result, Eq. (31)”. I will fix it in the blog.

This note uses the advances made in UFT315 to deduce the equation of the magnetic monopole (32) in simple vector notation. The advances in note 316(3) are used to remove the tangent indices in an entirely self consistent way. These are major advances in ECE theory, removing any lingering objection that may be made based on the presence of tangent indices. The Gauss law with magnetic monopole is Eq. (31), and for ease of comparison the magnetic monopole first derived geometrically about two years ago is given in Eq. (34). It is seen that the new result, Eq. (34), is much easier and simpler. A myriad of important advances can now be made in a way that should be workable in electrical engineering, because we use every day vector notation. These notes are checked as usual by Dr. Eckardt and Dr. Douglas Lindstrom, so the possibility of human error is very small. The condition of vanishing magnetic monopole is given in Eq. (33) in terms of the vector spin connection and vector tetrad. So this can be a three author paper: M .W. Evans, H. Eckardt and D. W. Lindstrom.

a316thpapernotes4.pdf

Many thanks to Dr. Doug Lindstrom for going through this note. The checking is very important work. It makes it virtually impossible for genuine scientists to criticize the technique of ECE theory.

1) I would say that the Kronecker delta is defined as in Carroll’s chapter three as:

delta sup a sub b = q sup a sub mu q sup mu sub a

in terms of tetrads and not unit vectors. This is Carroll’s equation (3.116) of his online notes, google “Carroll online notes”. In note 316(3) I further developed the method and replaced the unit vector by epsilon defined in Note 316(3).

2) Agreed, I came to this same conclusion in Note 316(2), Eq. (22), giving:

B = curl W

However as shown in Note 316(2) the nonlinear terms do not vanish from the electric field, as in eq. (24) of Note 316(2).

Note 316(3) is a comprehensive check on self consistency of the new method of removing tangent indices for complex circular coordinates.

In a message dated 26/05/2015 17:00:54 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

​In Horst’s absence, I’ve been verifying the 316 notes.

For 316(1)
-equation (15) – can we write instead
F sub mu sub nu = F sup a sub b sub mu sub nu delta sup b sub a

In form notation, does not the omega wedge term become

(omega sup a sub c ^ omega sup c sub b) e sup b e sub a = omega sub c ^ omega sup c

Doesn’t this vanish for a Minkowski metric, thereby removing the non-linear term from the curvature?

If so, rest of note is mute.

Doug

There were respectively 2019, 2491, 2149 and 2436 files downloaded from 382, 341, 380 and 443 study sessions over the weekend and Bank Holiday. Main spiders baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans / Morris papers 392, Scientometrics 348, F3(Sp) 256, Auto1 252, Auto2 79, UFT88 230, Definitive proofs that zero torsion means no Einsteinian gravitation 182, Engineering Model 130, Eckart Lindstrom papers 123, Principles of ECE 116, Evans Equations 102 (numerous Spanish), UFT311 73, UFT313 66, CEFE 58, Englynion (second book of poetry) 55, Llais 52, UFT314 37, UFT315 24, Autobiography Sonnets 24 (first book of poetry) to date in May 2015. Association of the Public Ministry of the State of Bahia Brazil general; Purdue University AIAS staff; University of Oregon UFT28; University of Helsinki UFT116; University of Franche-Comte Academy of Besancon France general; University of Otago New Zealand UFT99; City of Saransk Russia Home Page; City of Tomsk Russian Federation Home page; University of Edinburgh Scotland UFT143, 140, 167, 144, 141, 167, Spacetime Devices and general, intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for May 2015.

Unauthorized

This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn’t understand how to supply the credentials required.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

This is given in Eq. (5) in general, and the tangent space indices are removed using Eqs. (7) and (8) to give Eq. (10). This is translated into electrodynamics using Eq. (11) to give the magnetic monopole equation (12). The magnetic monopole vanishes if and only if Eq. (13) is true. The spin curvature vector is defined in Eq. (14), following UFT254 and UFT255, and the orbital curvature vector in Eq. (15). These are translated into new field potential equations (22) and (24). The magnetic flux potential is defined in Eq. (22).

a316thpapernotes2.pdf

A mathematical identity is an equation in which one side is identically the same as another. These played a basic role in the development of Riemann geometry and the now obsolete Einsteinian general relativity. It is important to note that the identities apply to all geometries, in any space of any dimension. The first of them appears to have been discovered but not published by Ricci in 1880 at the Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa. However they were rediscovered and published by Bianchi in 1902. If Levi-Civita is correct, and they were indeed inferred by Ricci in 1880, the Riemann curvature tensor must have been known as early as 1880, and finally published by Ricci and Levi-Civita in about 1900. Riemann himself inferred the metric. The connection was inferred later by Christoffel. In the early nineteen twenties Cartan showed that first Bianchi identity of 1902 is incorrect. The first Bianchi identity in the minimalist notation of ECE theory is R ^ q = 0, but the correct Cartan identity is D ^ T := R ^ q. I have given a detailed proof of this exact identity in various ECE papers. The definitive proofs on www.aias.us show that if T = 0 is assumed, then it follows that R = 0, so the Einstein theory is trivially incorrect because it is based on R ^ q = 0, an incorrect equation. The proofs have been read about seven thousand times since 2011 without any valid objection. The second Bianchi identity of 1902 was a development of the first Bianchi identity and the second Bianchi identity is therefore incorrect. It follows that the Einstein field equation of 1915 is trivially incorrect because it is based directly on the second Bianchi identity. The classic UFT88 was the first attempt to correct the second Bianchi identity for torsion. It has been read many thousands of times without any valid objection and is frequently read in top ranking universities, including Scuola Normale Superiore. It was developed with the commutator method in UFT99, and in UFT112 the Evans torsion identity of all geometry was discovered. This is an exact and correct identity valid in any space of any dimension. There is an equivalent of the Evans identity for curvature, and I should work this out one day. In early ECE papers I discovered the Cartan Evans identity D ^ T tilde := R tilde ^ q, where tilde denotes Hodge duality. The Cartan Evans identity is valid in four dimensions only. The 1902 derivation of the second Bianchi identity is highly non trivial (not an exercise to be “left to the student”). It needs the little known Ricci identity, an example in contemporary terms of the covariant derivative of a higher order tensor. So the Ricci identity must also have been inferred in about 1880 by Ricci. In UFT255 I made the first attempt to develop the identities finally discovered from the Jacobi identity in UFT313, an intricate paper which nonetheless is being read at the rate of about a thousand times a year, despite its complexity. The Jacobi Cartan Evans (JCE) identity is the second Bianchi identity corrected for torsion and is a fundamentally new identity of geometry valid in all spaces and all dimensions. It is a rigorously correct identity of all geometry, a kind of new Pythagoras Theorem, metaphorically writing. It was developed in vector format in UFT314 and UFT315 and immediately led to curvature based ECE theory. The JCE identity should be regarded as the final form of UFT88. The derivation of the JCE identity from the Jacobi identity in UFT313 is again highly non trivial, and the derivation has the important result of giving the Evans identity of UFT112 automatically. Therefore in summary, ECE general relativity is the correct way of developing Einsteinian general relativity. The first and second Bianchi identities of 1902 (first inferred by Ricci in 1880 according to his student Levi CIvita) are replaced by the Cartan identity and JCE identity respectively. These give rise respectively to torsion and curvature based generally covariant unified field theories. These are the only valid unified field theories, the standard model, being riddled with errors, is obsolete and meaningless.

Note 316(1) introduced a simple way of removing the tangent indices from ECE theory, leaving a two index electromagnetic field tensor that has the same format as that of Maxwell Heaviside (MH) theory, and giving equations that have the same format as MH theory. However the spin connection is present in the equations and the electric and magnetic charge current densities are defined geometrically. So the next stages are to develop the new tensor equations into vector format. The major new development is that ECE can be based on curvature as well as torsion. So a parallel development is now possible of all the main conclusions of torsion based unified field theory, translating them into curvature based ECE theory. Spin connection resonance theory can be developed anew. The ECE theory is the most economical unified field theory in the history of science, all the main equations of natural philosophy are obtained from the two Maurer Cartan structure equations: T = D ^ q and R = D ^ omega. These definitions imply the Cartan identity D ^ T := R ^ q and the new identities discovered in UFT313. All the wave equations of physics are obtained form the tetrad postulate. The latter asserts that a vector field is independent of the basis set in which it is written. For example a three dimensional vector field is the same vector field in Cartesian and spherical polar coordinates.