Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

Agreed that Eq. (1) is based on antisymmetry. This note introduces the minimal prescription (4) – (6) so U symbolizes energy in general. There are new concepts in the note which will be used later in the development of ECE2 theory to give all the results currently attributed to Einsteinian general relativity. The three cases are just examples or limits of the general theory, Eq. (7). It can be seen that eq. (7) is more general than the Newtonian

g = – del phi

so Eq. (7) can describe non Newtonian effects such as light bending, anomalous precession, and the velocity curve of a whirlpool galaxy. Eq. (8) is the condition under which Eq. (7) can be reduced to the format of the Newtonian theory, the equation above. This results in Eq. (11). The Newtonian limit is equivalent to. (12) and (13). The quantum theory is introduced and it leads to the anticommutator equation (27). The familiar Newtonian equation F = mg is developed in to Eq. (34) and the spin connection and tetrad in the Newtonian limit defined by Eqs. (38) and (39). The equations (16) and (17) are derived as you describe and agreed that there should be a factor 2 on the right hand side of Eqs. (14) and (15), To derive Eq. (25) use Eq. (8) and (24). Eq. (25) is an operator equation and takes the format of Eq. (26). In Ryder’s “Quantum Field Theory” the method is sketched of deriving the Pauli exclusion principle from the anticommutator in quantum field theory. The whole of the development of this note can be used for electrodynamics. Agreed about eq. (31). It is more general than an Euler Bernoullli equation and del p occurs in fluid dynamics and aerodynamics. In Eqs. (35) and (36) p is changed into omega using eq. (23), and 2i h bar cancels out either side. This leads to the derivation of the tetrad and spin connection in the Newtonian limit, Eqs. (38) and (39). Agreed about Eq (43). This entire set of equations can also be used in electrodynamics and for the nuclear weak and strong fields. So counter gravitation in this theory is given by:

U omega bold > – c omega sub 0 p bold

This is a very simple condition.

To: EMyrone@aol.com
Sent: 27/06/2015 17:29:31 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 319(2): New Gravitational Results from ECE2 Theory

I have a lot of questions concerning this note:
The beginning of this note is a bit confusing for me. You consider 3 cases of g, potentials and spin connections:
– ECE2
– ECE2 with antisymmetry conditions
– Newtonian case

It would be easier to understand if you used different symbols for each case, for example U, U_ant, U_Newton etc. You did this partially with the phi potential.

Is the second equality sign in eq. 1 correct? I assume you mean g with antisymm. conditions, then it is. To change p in to omega use eq. (23) and 2i h bar cancels either side. Agreed about Eq. (43).

The approaches (14,15) seem to require an additional factor of 2, a typo.

Where do eqs. 16-17 come from? Obviously you insert (14,15) into (12,13). Then (16,17) hold for the Newtonian limit.

How exactly did you derive eq.(25)?
The connection to quantum physics is interesting.

Eq.(31) reminds to fluid dynamics. Q seems to be interpretable as a velocity potential and has indeed physical dimensions of m/s.

Eqs.(35,36): How did you change g into p and omega?

Eq.(43): should it read:
– U omega > c omega_0 p ?

Am 27.06.2015 um 15:14 schrieb EMyrone:

This note uses the antisymmetry eq. (1) of ECE2 to find several new equations of ECE2 gravitation. The Newtonian limit of ECE2 is well defined by Eqs. (8), (12) and (13). These equations lead to a new anticommutator equation of quantum gravity, Eq. (27) in the Newtonian limit. This equation becomes non Newtonian if its right hand side is non zero. This is interesting because in quantum field theory the anticommutator is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle. The famous force is mass times acceleration of the Newtonian limit is extended in ECE2 to Eq. (34). The spin conenction vector and the tetrad vector of the Newtonian limit of ECE2 are given by Eqs. (38) and (39). Non Newtonian effects of ECE2 are described by Eqs. (40) and (41), zero ECE2 gravitation by Eq. (42) and repulsive ECE2 counter gravitation by Eq. (43). These results are much simpler and more powerful than UFT318, which should be regarded as a transitional paper to UFT319. We now have a clear idea of how to engineer counter gravitation. Great progress has been made from the early attempts of ten or eleven years ago.

Many thanks, I agree with all these comments, and the corrigenda can be read off this blog as usual and incorporated by Alex Hill in the translation. It will be very interesting to see the graphics and numerical results of UFT318 Section 3. I think that there is already a video of counter gravitational effects on www.et3m and www.upitec.org.

Subj: Comments for paper 318

Some hints and comments:
1. In eq.(73) a parenthesis is missing, see eq.(36) of note 6.

2. In eq.(79) g was defined with a sign-reversed spin connection,
compared to (54). You consider a negative spin connection, but the
equation should not be altered. Eq. (80) is affected too.

3. According to (68, 71), there has been defined a sign reversal between
the cos factor and rho_m, therefore in (76,77) a minus sign should
appear in front of rho_e.

4. The “photons” of the ECE2 vacuum are no ordinary photons because the
e-m fields are zero, perhaps they should be called “longitudinal photons”.

Horst

This note uses the antisymmetry eq. (1) of ECE2 to find several new equations of ECE2 gravitation. The Newtonian limit of ECE2 is well defined by Eqs. (8), (12) and (13). These equations lead to a new anticommutator equation of quantum gravity, Eq. (27) in the Newtonian limit. This equation becomes non Newtonian if its right hand side is non zero. This is interesting because in quantum field theory the anticommutator is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle. The famous force is mass times acceleration of the Newtonian limit is extended in ECE2 to Eq. (34). The spin conenction vector and the tetrad vector of the Newtonian limit of ECE2 are given by Eqs. (38) and (39). Non Newtonian effects of ECE2 are described by Eqs. (40) and (41), zero ECE2 gravitation by Eq. (42) and repulsive ECE2 counter gravitation by Eq. (43). These results are much simpler and more powerful than UFT318, which should be regarded as a transitional paper to UFT319. We now have a clear idea of how to engineer counter gravitation. Great progress has been made from the early attempts of ten or eleven years ago.

a319thpapernotes2.pdf

In this note it is shown that the gravitational vector potential cannot be assumed to be zero without introducing a contradiction, so the theory of gravitation is developed as in Eq. (20), the usual Newtonian potential is developed as in Eq. (28) ECE2 leads to zero gravitation under condition (30), which also gives the possibility of gravitational repulsion. ECE2 reduces to Newton under the condition (29). So ECE2 can be developed to explain all the effects usual ascribed to Einstein, plus a lot more. The next stage is to match ECE2 theory with x theory.

a319thpapernotes1.pdf

UFT319 will aim to simplify and strengthen the preliminary counter gravitation theory of UFT318 by deriving differential equations that can be solved by computer. From antisymmetry:

g = -4 Phi omega = – 2 grad Phi

so it is clear that the sign of g is reversed by reversing the sign of the spin connection omega. This immediately gives counter gravitation, the engineering problem is to devise a circuit that can reverse the sign of the spin connection. UFT319 will also aim to derive differential equations for omega so a more general form of it can be deduced in a self consistent general theory. In UFT318 the spin connection for the Newtonian limit was deduced. It is no longer necessary to assume an Euler Bernoulli structure, the computer can be used to solve the differential equations.

Diolch yn fawr, am wybodaeth yn unig. This was for informration only. I safely received the sample folder.

In a message dated 25/06/2015 14:16:04 GMT Daylight Time, paul.joyner@llgc.org.uk writes:

On 24/06/2015 09:49, EMyrone@aol.com wrote:
> These are for sale by auction on ebay as “Original Autograph Manuscripts
> of Myron Evans, Civil List Pensioner” at a starting price of five
> million pounds for the collection, and a starting price of fifty
> thousand pounds per folder. These offer prices have been carefully
> estimated from autograph manuscripts of past and present Civil List
> Pensioners. Proceeds will be invested for charitable work on behalf of
> science and culture and language in Wales under the auspices of the
> Newlands Family Trust. Civil List Pensioners in science include Sir
> William Herschel, John Dalton, Michael Faraday, James Joule, Sir William
> Rowan Hamilton and Oliver Heaviside. Civil List Pensioners in literature
> include George Gordon Lord Byron, William Wordsworth, Alfred Lord
> Tennyson, Walter de la Mare, James Joyce, William Butler Yeats and
> Vernon Watkins, mentor and friend of Dylan Thomas. The collection has
> been described by Christie’s of London and New York as important and
> valuable in both science and literature in the Welsh and English
> languages and will be bound to increase rapidly in value because of its
> impact worldwide, an impact which defies hyperbole and which is known
> with great accuracy (UFT307 on www.aias.us <http://www.aias.us>, and
> “Collected Scientometrics” (New Generation, 2015).

Dear Dr Evans
Thank you for your information- I no longer work with archives or books
so I am passing your message to my colleague for her consideration.
Yours sincerely
Paul Joyner

Many thanks, it is much easier for an on board device to influence g1 than to influence g because g1 for m of one kilogram is twenty four orders of magnitude less than g, the mass M of the earth being about five ten power 24 kilograms. One no longer needs spin connection resonance at all. As you know I was asked by John Shelburne a decade ago to explain the resonance device of Alex Hill and co workers, demonstrated to the U. S. Navy in Florida and that is what catalyzed connection resonance. It turns out that this was the wrong approach for counter gravitation. Now we have the right approach. Of course this is only the beginning of things, the simplest possible theory. With computer algebra it is no problem to use more realistic theories. I am pretty sure that a lab circuit could be designed to influence a mass in the laboratory, for example an electron beam or neutral atom beam to get rid of artifacts due to electrostatics. The Ide circuit could possibly be adapted for counter gravitation. Alex Hill has demonstrated counter gravitation so obviously it is possible to build a counter gravitation circuit.

In a message dated 25/06/2015 14:21:46 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

good remarks, I think they are important for an understanding of the method.

Am 25.06.2015 um 15:08 schrieb EMyrone:

The ECE2 field / potential equations of gravitation are much richer in structure than Newton, and correct Einstein for torsion. They are similar to the ECE gravitational equations but use the new methods of UFT313 to UFT317. An entirely new method for counter gravitation has been devised, one which does not use spin connection resonance, it uses the same Euler Bernoulli equation, but finds a method of reducing g1 to zero, where g1 is defined simply by:

F = mg = Mg1 = -mMG / r squared = -MmG / r squared

The g1 is therefore defined simply as:

g1 = (m / M) g

and is the acceleration due to the gravity of m rather than M. Clearly, F is the same, and when g1 is reduced to zero, F is zero, and there is no force of attraction between m and M. So

g = – MG / r squared

is the accleration due to garvity of the earth, and g1 is the acceleration due to gravity of the mass m:

g1 = – mG / r squared.

The masses m and M are point masses in the Newtonian view. The method depends on

mM = Mm

which is always true. The force of gravitation, or g force, is reduced to zero by an on board electrical devices. This is the simplest possible theory in which there is no A present. Spin connection resonance theory has been greatly developed by Eckardt, Lindstrom and myself. UFT311 is a key paper because it demonstrates the existence of the spin connection in classical elecrtodynamics using a precisely know circuit by Ide.

The ECE2 field / potential equations of gravitation are much richer in structure than Newton, and correct Einstein for torsion. They are similar to the ECE gravitational equations but use the new methods of UFT313 to UFT317. An entirely new method for counter gravitation has been devised, one which does not use spin connection resonance, it uses the same Euler Bernoulli equation, but finds a method of reducing g1 to zero, where g1 is defined simply by:

F = mg = Mg1 = -mMG / r squared = -MmG / r squared

The g1 is therefore defined simply as:

g1 = (m / M) g

and is the acceleration due to the gravity of m rather than M. Clearly, F is the same, and when g1 is reduced to zero, F is zero, and there is no force of attraction between m and M. So

g = – MG / r squared

is the accleration due to garvity of the earth, and g1 is the acceleration due to gravity of the mass m:

g1 = – mG / r squared.

The masses m and M are point masses in the Newtonian view. The method depends on

mM = Mm

which is always true. The force of gravitation, or g force, is reduced to zero by an on board electrical devices. This is the simplest possible theory in which there is no A present. Spin connection resonance theory has been greatly developed by Eckardt, Lindstrom and myself. UFT311 is a key paper because it demonstrates the existence of the spin connection in classical elecrtodynamics using a precisely know circuit by Ide.

In this final version a sign error and missing omega zub Z are corrected in Eq. (73) after the calculations were checked by computer by co author Horst Eckardt. These errors are also corrected in Eq. (75), which has an analytical solution. The conclusions of the paper are not affected.

a318thpaper.pdf

a318thpapernotes1.pdf

a318thpapernotes2.pdf

a318thpapernotes2and3finalversions.pdf

a318thpapernotes3.pdf

a318thpapernotes4.pdf

a318thpapernotes5.pdf

a318thpapernotes6.pdf

a318thpapernotes7.pdf

This would be very interesting. As you see I have written up UFT318 as a three author paper and pencilled in a section 3. This is just the beginning of counter gravitation theory. ECE2 can also be applied to things like light bending and so on, and matched up with x theory.

Sent: 25/06/2015 09:29:28 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Negative g

I will see what can be done in a model calculation.
Horst

Am 25.06.2015 um 08:55 schrieb EMyrone:

Many thanks, I suggest that UFT318 graphics could be used at the Idaho conference and perhaps a video with the permission of AIAS Director Alex Hill showing counter gravitational devices at work (www.et3m.net, www.upitec.org).

In a message dated 24/06/2015 16:58:17 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

​I something showable comes from this, I’ll put it in the Idaho talk.
Doug

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:24 PM, <EMyrone> wrote:

Yes, g is given by Eq. (36) and can become negative. It would be very useful if Horst Eckardt and Douglas Lindstrom could incisively graph the appropriate equations and solutions of Note 318(6). Horst’s graphics are famous worldwide. I will proceed to writing up UFT318 on this main theme, as a three author paper, Evans, Eckardt and Lindstrom. It is also important to compare this new theory with the experimental data of Alex Hill, data which can be obtained from his counter gravitational devices. If he has not already done so, Alex Hill could make a video of the counter gravitational devices at work, and we can npoist that on www.aias.us with his permission. This can be done commercial in confidence, but the theory is in the public domain. Your own Hewlett Packard in Boise, Idaho would also be interested in this work, and many other large corporations. As you know, tens of thousands of corporations study ECE and ECE2 all the time. So one of them is very likely going to produce a counter gravitational device of its own and devices taking energy from spacetime, and also LENR devices. There have also been thousands of visits to www.aias.us from Government departments, so Government funding should also be sought by UPITEC and AIAS.

To: EMyrone
Sent: 23/06/2015 20:19:44 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Solutions for 318(6) by Doug Lindstrom

Another question can g be made negative creating repulsion?

~ Sean

On Jun 23, 2015, at 6:57 AM, EMyrone wrote:

Many thanks for these solutions, which will be very helpful. Zero gravitation is obviously important if implemented, for example on locomotives and of course aicraft and space vehicles. One can imagine science fiction space vehicles popping into orbit. I still remember trains coming through Kingston, New York near the IBM plant. They were very long trains with gigantic locomotives coming down the Hudson valley. If you got caught at a crossing by one of these you were there for a very long time.

To: EMyrone, mail
Sent: 23/06/2015 13:38:09 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Re: 318(6): Zero Gravitation from an On Board Electric Circuit

​ Good note. Series solution for equation 37 and exact solution for 38 attached.

Doug

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:27 AM, <EMyrone> wrote:

This note uses ECE2 theory to show that it is possible to design an electrical circuit to reduce to zero the gravitational force between a mass m and a mass M. The former can be a laboratory mass and the latter the mass of the earth. So gravity can be reduced to zero in ECE2 theory.

<316-6.pdf>

=