Alpha Institute for Advanced Studies

Dear Dr Ide,

Pleasure! I can see that the interest in UFT311 is already apparent through the feedback activity to www.aias.us and it is going to be a well studied paper. We all agree that this is a very important paper indicating for the first time accurate agreement between ECE theory and experimental data from circuits. The theory was developed from the spin connection that appears in the generally covariant ECE theory of classical electrodynamics unified with gravitation and the weak and strong fields (www.aias.us, www.upitec.org, www.atomicprecision.com, www.et3m.net, www.webarchive.org.uk). The spin connection does not appear in the Maxwell Heaviside theory of special relativity. The role of the spin connection and the ECE vacuum has been developed considerably by Dr. Horst Eckardt and Dr. Douglas Lindstrom in the Eckardt / Lindstrom papers, UFT292 to UFT299. The ECE vacuum is the key to energy from spacetime in your excellent experimental work and in low energy nuclear reactors (LENR) (UFT226 ff.). There is an unlimited source of clean electric power in the ECE vacuum. In my opinion these devices should be developed and marketed as soon as is humanly possible. Conventional fossil fuel causes pollution and wind turbines are an obvious failure.

Cordially Yours,

Myron Evans.

cc Prime Minister’s Office in my role as Civil List Pensioner

In a message dated 29/03/2015 18:25:01 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Dr. Evans,

Thank you for your email.

I was very surprised to see the paper of Dr. Eckardt and Kurt.

The experimental data and the theoretical calculation are remarkably coincident.

My theory of EMF function is just a deduced hypothesis from the result of my experiment.

I don’t know why it is. I know I need some theory to derive from different physical rule.

I suppose Dr. Eckardt succeeded it from ECE.

The presentation of my three papers at ACS were depending on the review of AIAS fellows,

Franklin, Dr. Eckardt, Simon, Dr. Lindstrom and you.

Especially, Franklin has not only introduced me to AIAS but also he came to Washington D.C. to see my presentation at SPESIF 2012 Conference.

I appreciate all.

Best regards,

Osamu Ide

There were 2,202 hits or files downloaded from 354 distinct visits or reading sessions, main spiders baidu, google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans / Morris papers 450, Auto1 321, Auto2 144, F3(Sp) 317, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 202, Book of Scientometrics 180, Principles of ECE 172, Evans Equations 155 (numerous Spanish), UFT88 135, Engineering Model 114, CEFE 81, Englynion 67 (second book of poetry), Autobiography Sonnets 25 (first book of poetry) to date in March 2015. Dalhousie University Canada First definitive proof that no torsion means no gravitation and refutation of the Einsteinian general relativity; University of Antioquia Colombia UFT142(Sp); International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) Trieste Diplomatic Objection to ‘t Hooft by Gareth Evans. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for March 2015.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: March 2015 – URL
Generated 29-Mar-2015 11:37 EDT

This looks very interesting. UFT311 is a big breakthrough because the way has been found in which a circuit can produce the spin connection. There are many equations that can be utilized, UFT254 ff. are the most advanced stage of the theory, and they are summarized in UFT281 to UFT288 and can be used with UFT292 to UFT299. Again my congratulations!

In a message dated 29/03/2015 15:56:24 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Besides further work on the Ide device I am planning to think about the resonance experiments of the Owens-Davis group we talked with last year. If you, Doug and Steve, like we could discuss which equations are suitable for a 3D FE calculation. We had some difficulties with the analytical vector potential last year.
Also your LENR paper, Doug, could be discussed, at least when we have new experiments. A colleague of the Munich group is trying this as I reported but it takes some time for him to build up his measuring equipment, for example for gamma ray detection at 17 MeV, that seems to be difficult.

Horst

Am 27.03.2015 um 18:24 schrieb Steve Bannister:

Horst, your work looks like a brilliant result, still digesting it.

Further, here is a link to a report translation of a very recent Alexander Parkhomov replication of the Rossi “Lugano” experiment. Parkhomov has now had several successes, and is completely “open science” about them. These are important results.

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/27/parkhomov-report-thread-agp-speaks-at-seminar-in-moscow-mar-26/

Between AIAS and UPITEC results and these experiments, this is shaping up to be a great year for science and humanity.

Very best,

Steve

Most grateful as ever!

This paper derives two new equations for photon rest mass, one from Stefan Boltzmann law and one using the relation between the flux density and frequency of monochromatic radiation. The Evans Morris effects are derived for an electron beam interacting with matter. It is shown that the missing mass of the universe is due to moving photons with mass m = gamma m0, where m0 is the rest mass and gamma the Lorentz factor. This paper must be read in conjunction with its eight background notes, which contain many pages of essential background detail. Section 3 is pencilled in for a computational and graphical analysis by co author Horst Eckart. This is another in the very intensely studied Evans / Morris series of papers, UFT278-280, 289-291, 300, 304, 306, 308, 309 in English and Spanish.

a310thpaper.pdf

a310thpapernotes1.pdf

a310thpapernotes2.pdf

a310thpapernotes3.pdf

a310thpapernotes4.pdf

a310thpapernotes5.pdf

a310thpapernotes6.pdf

a310thpapernotes7.pdf

a310thpapernotes8.pdf

Dear Dr Ide,

Many thanks for making available the details of your circuit. This is of key importance, and congratulations to all concerned on this major breakthrough in understanding energy from spacetime in terms of ECE theory as extended by Horst Eckardt and Doug Lindstrom in UFT292 to UFT299, currently being read about two thousand four hundred times a year. I am glad that the ACS conference liked your papers an UFT311. It is obvious that your experimental methods and the ECE theory are fully accepted as mainstream science, and that the idea of electrodynamics as general relativity based on torsion has also been accepted. In my opinion this is a historic advance, showing precisely and clearly that clean energy is available from spacetime in unlimited quantities.

Myron Evans

In a message dated 28/03/2015 17:17:03 GMT Daylight Time, writes:

Dear Dr. Eckardt,

My wife and I have just returned from ACS at Denver in this evening.

The presentation of my three papers for ACS have been done in 24th March as same on the program.

The evaluation of my papers were pretty well, especially for several chemistry professors of several State University.

I was asked significant question by them.

I found your paper is on AIAS site and having very good comment by the members, as same as I have emailed you before.

I also expect much reaction for your paper.

I got a CD of presented papers in the ENFL division of ACS but I haven’t opened it yet.

I will send them soon.

Best regards,

Osamu Ide

Many thanks, I have just received the e mail, Eq. (39) is the direct result of the two de Broglie equations:

h bar omega = gamma m0 c squared = m c sqaured

and
h bar omega0 = m0 c squared

So
omega / omega0 = gamma = m / m0

and this gives a Beer Lambert law for photon mass. The rest of the remarks here are very interesting. I will send out UFT310 later today.

To: emyrone@aol.com
Sent: 28/03/2015 15:41:32 GMT Daylight Time
Subj: Fwd: Discussion of note 310(8)

I am not sure if this email went through…

How did you derive eq.(39)? If you set B=0 in eq.(2), you cannot evaluate

rho >= 0

any more.

The absorption coefficient of the universe can be estimated by assuming
a maximally observed redshift, say 6, and the size of the universe,
about 92 billion lightyears. With

1/redshift = omega/omega_0 = m/m_0 = exp(-alpha*L/2)

I obtain

alpha ~ 4.12e-27.

I think the redshift is defined a bit differently but that should not
matter here.
This theory also resolves the problem found by Halton Arp: red shifts of
Quasars differ significantly from that of the stars “near” to them. Big
gaseous clouds observed in their vicinity answer this question elegantly.

Horst

Am 26.03.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Myron Evans:
> This note introduces the Beer Lambert law for photon mass, Eq. (38),
> with the power absorption coefficient defined in terms of photon
> velocity in Eq. (37) and in terms of initial and final frequencies in
> Eq. (33). The photon rest mass m0 is estimated form the lowest
> observable electromagnetic frequencies, and is less than about ten
> power minus 55 kilograms, corresponding to sub hertzian frequencies
> and a static photon. The photon mass m for finite photon velocity is
> gamma m0 and this is what has been derived in previous UFT papers. The
> missing mass m is made up of photons of mass propagating at various
> velocities down to zero (i.e. across the entire range of the
> electromagnetic frequency from gamma ray to sub hertzian.

There were 2,209 hits or files downloaded from 462 distinct visits or study sessions, main spiders google, MSN, yandex and yahoo. Evans / Morris papers 446, Auto1 315, Auto2 143, F3(Sp) 312, Eckardt / Lindstrom papers 201, Book of Scientometrics 175, Principles of ECE 170, Evans Equations 152 (numerous Spanish), UFT88 130, Engineering Model 114, CEFE 81, Englynion 66 (second book of poetry), Llais 52, Autobiography Sonnets 25 (first book of poetry) to date in March 2015. McGill University Canada UFT155; University of Illinois Urbana Champaign LCR Resonant; University of Pennsylvania Educational Note Two; University of Vermont UFT175; Purion Company (environmental technology) My page and overview; University of Poitiers general; Ritsumei University Japan LCR resonant; United States Navy Information Dominance Systems Command UFT229. Intense interest all sectors, updated usage file attached for March 2015.

Usage Statistics for aias.us aias.us

Summary Period: March 2015 – URL
Generated 28-Mar-2015 11:37 EDT

This is clear from the expression for total energy E = gamma m0 c squared, where gamma = 1 (1 – (v/c) squared) power half, the Lorentz factor. here m0 is the rest mass of the particle. For any relativistic particle, including the photon with rest mass m0, E goes to infinity as v goes to c unless m0 is zero. This is usually arm waved away by stating that a particle that moves at c must have zero mass, and that is the photon. No other particle can ever move at c. However it is clear to any O level pupil that refractive index n = c / v, and photons travel at v in matter. So photons have mass. The mass does not magically appear in matter and disappear again as soon as light leaves the material. Photon mass has actually been inferred since ancient times. Newton inferred it in his corpuscular theory of light, and Poincare inferred it in 1905 when he thought of a photon in the same way as any other relativistic particle. The de Broglie wave particle dualism was actually based on photon mass. The existence of photon mass was confirmed by my late 1991 discovery of the B(3) field of non linear optics. This is easily observed through the static magnetization of the inverse Faraday effect, and longitudinal, whereas a massless photon produces only transverse modes of radiation and the flat, unphysical, E(2) little group of the Poincare group. The physical little group is O(3) of the photon with mass, and not E(2) of the massless photon. Even Ryder admits that he does not understand E(2). For Ryder to admit anything is a very rare happening. He is still trying to ignore UFT225. Teh Euclidean E(2) little group is a flat group in three dimensional space, meaning that space is flat. This is news to most of us unless we have sailed of the edge of the world, ship’s biscuit weavels and all. Photon mass and B(3) makes a weavel’s breakfast of the old standard physics. Which is the lesser of two weavels, B(3) or photon mass? Maxwell Heaviside is based on special relativity, and runs into many difficulties. Only electrical engineers think that MH is perfection. With the appearance of UFT311 it has spectacularly disintegrated – again. It has disintegrated since 1992 many many times and probably before that, many many times.

I am writing up UFT310 and should emphazise that one of it smain results is that the photon rest mass can be found from any deviation from the Stefan Boltzmann law for black body radiation of all frequencies. Testing the Stefan Boltzmann law has been going on in standards laboratories for well over a century. In a monochromatic beam the photon rest mass is found from measuring the flux density and frequency. This is a cleaner experiment. The photon rest mass is very small, less than about ten power minus 55 kilograms, so these will have to be very accurate experiments under rigorously controlled conditions. The mass m of a photon moving at v is order of magnitude higher than the rest mass. This is another important point made in UFT310. Here:

m / m0 = gamma

obeys a Beer Lambert law, another conclusion of UFT310.